Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Hey CD
Comments
-
Q for the tug’s 0-fer legal team; does a sheriff in Montana have to enforce federal gun laws? Use local enforcement time and resources to enforce federal law? Incarcerate local gun and ammunition dealers that are not in compliance with federal law?RaceBannon said: -
I'll go with A because it includes the rest of the choices.
-
Start a thread and find out.CirrhosisDawg said:
Q for the tug’s 0-fer legal team; does a sheriff in Montana have to enforce federal gun laws? Use local enforcement time and resources to enforce federal law? Incarcerate local gun and ammunition dealers that are not in compliance with federal law?
In the meantime, why did Pelosi start moving on USMCA when you said tariffs had to be removed first? -
Fuck off. California LE would be ordered to act in each of your scenarios.MikeDamone said:
Start a thread and find out.
In the meantime, why did Pelosi start moving on USMCA when you said tariffs had to be removed first? -
Bonus point additional question for Trumptards with your furrowed brows and scratching heads, if the Supreme Court took up California’s sanctuary state laws, what recent precedent would trump argue?
-
So sad, CD: You've been reduced to 20 year old slogans that lost their meanings a long time ago.CirrhosisDawg said:
Anyone that believes in free trade, free markets, and free people would hope he does.
You're like the Cubs fan holding up a banner on opening day that reads: "Wait 'Til Next Year!"
#DoomedToLoserdom #NoEndInSight -
Race replied to my post. I was obliged to respond.MikeDamone said:
Start a thread and find out.
In the meantime, why did Pelosi start moving on USMCA when you said tariffs had to be removed first?
Fuck off. -
So respond to mine, dumbfuckCirrhosisDawg said:
-
Oh Fuck, CD! Your Tri-Questioning Tick is back with a Vengeance! Poor Soul.CirrhosisDawg said:
So you’re following the case? Aware of the arguments, if any and from whom? Any precedents that could possibly be cited if there was an appeal? The timing?
“Any day now” potd in the clubhouse.
Maybe Santa will bring you some cyanide capsules? Merry Xmas! -
So TurdbufferFS, does a sheriff in Montana have to enforce federal law and incarcerate non-compliant gun and ammunition dealers?TurdBomber said:
Oh Fuck, CD! Your Tri-Questioning Tick is back with a Vengeance! Poor Soul.
Maybe Santa will bring you some cyanide capsules? Merry Xmas!
Is this a difficult question for you? -
I choose A. But I'll buy B, C and D.Swaye said:Have we figured out yet if CD is:
a) A dumbass moron
b) A true belieber progressive American hating moron
c) A once rational person with a weak constitution that was overwhelmed by TDS because he has a mangina
d) A Never Trumper trying to make liberals looks bad -
Bump.CirrhosisDawg said:
So TurdbufferFS, does a sheriff in Montana have to enforce federal law and incarcerate non-compliant gun and ammunition dealers?
Is this a difficult question for you? -
You've never been funny, CD. Ever.CirrhosisDawg said:
I'd laugh if you self-immolated, though. Everyone would. -
TurdbufferFS, is a sheriff in Montana obligated to enforce federal gun laws? Incarcerate non-compliant gun and ammunition dealers?TurdBomber said:
You've never been funny, CD. Ever.
I'd laugh if you self-immolated, though. Everyone would.
If you weren’t a a flaming pedophile you’d answer. -
Only two questions in this post. Running out of Retard Juice?CirrhosisDawg said:
So TurdbufferFS, does a sheriff in Montana have to enforce federal law and incarcerate non-compliant gun and ammunition dealers?
Is this a difficult question for you? -
If his mom would just stop the meatloaf we'd be rid of him. It'd take quite a while but it's obvious he's too dense to feed himself.TurdBomber said:
Oh Fuck, CD! Your Tri-Questioning Tick is back with a Vengeance! Poor Soul.
Maybe Santa will bring you some cyanide capsules? Merry Xmas! -
Worried about you CD
