Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The silence is deafening
Comments
-
Owl, like I told HH, the facts were laid out by leading economists from Harvard and Princeton and agreed to by BO's chief economics member on his staff. Your argument is with them. Now go get em' tiger, give it your best shot I am sure you can out think them.
HH, I will request the link again.
-
What's funny is you don't even interpret your own link properly. You clearly have no idea what a contractor is.Bendintheriver said:Owl, like I told HH, the facts were laid out by leading economists from Harvard and Princeton and agreed to by BO's chief economics member on his staff. Your argument is with them. Now go get em' tiger, give it your best shot I am sure you can out think them.
HH, I will request the link again. -
AgreeBendintheriver said:Owl, like I told HH, the facts were laid out by leading economists from Harvard and Princeton and agreed to by BO's chief economics member on his staff. Your argument is with them. Now go get em' tiger, give it your best shot I am sure you can out think them.
HH, I will request the link again. -
The Bureau of Labor has all sorts of statistics, Atl. You feel free to explain how part time employment fell from a high of about 9 million in 2009 to about half that many, the economy netted 15 million new jobs, and somehow, nonetheless, 95% of those jobs were part time. This must be that "new math" we used to talk about.Bendintheriver said:
Hey HH why don't you show us the link for that graph please.HHusky said: