Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Live look at the Schiff..er...Nadler Show

HoustonHusky
HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
in Tug Tavern



Queen Latifah better watch out...they are coming for her next...
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    I knew impeachment was really bad for trump but apparently it’s a growing into an absolute meltdown level disaster.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,886
    Bendintheriver said:

    Wow. Professor Karlan almost looks and sounds like a far left rat. Imagine that.

    Schitf allowed 3 far left rats and one more middle of the road dem to be present at the hearings.

    Sounds real fair now doesn't it.

    If a Democrat tells Atl bribery is crime, does it suddenly become a doubtful proposition?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,002
    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Wow. Professor Karlan almost looks and sounds like a far left rat. Imagine that.

    Schitf allowed 3 far left rats and one more middle of the road dem to be present at the hearings.

    Sounds real fair now doesn't it.

    If a Democrat tells Atl bribery is crime, does it suddenly become a doubtful proposition?
    Well that depends on if a dem focus group thought "bribery" sounded better than "quid pro quo". Which is the crime HH? Do you need Stretch to go back and focus group again so that you rats can figure out just what you are trying to impeach the guy for again? If the second focus group tells you that "bribery" is not swaying public opinion like "quid pro quo" didn't, are you going to change the charge and its name a third time?

    I am embarrassed for you counselor.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-not-call-it-a-bribe-democrats-have-focus-group-tested-their-impeachment-strategy-for-maximum-effect

    Democrats shelved “quid pro quo” after private polling found “bribery” packed more of a punch with survey respondents.

    “[T]he Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted focus groups in key House battlegrounds in recent weeks, testing messages related to impeachment,” the Washington Post reports. “Among the questions put to participants was whether ‘quid pro quo,’ ‘extortion’ or ‘bribery’ was a more compelling description of Trump’s conduct.”
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    Gaetz just embarrassed one of them...

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Trump will be impeached in the coming weeks based on the inquiry as laid out so far. Then additional articles of impeachment that impeach trump again after Mulvaney, Pompeo and bolton testify will be approved with 230+ votes. Pelosi can send the articles of impeachment to the senate in piece or in full, however and whenever she chooses.

    Trump should have supported better candidates in 2018 when he lost a national election and got himself impeached.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,886
    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Wow. Professor Karlan almost looks and sounds like a far left rat. Imagine that.

    Schitf allowed 3 far left rats and one more middle of the road dem to be present at the hearings.

    Sounds real fair now doesn't it.

    If a Democrat tells Atl bribery is crime, does it suddenly become a doubtful proposition?
    Well that depends on if a dem focus group thought "bribery" sounded better than "quid pro quo". Which is the crime HH? Do you need Stretch to go back and focus group again so that you rats can figure out just what you are trying to impeach the guy for again? If the second focus group tells you that "bribery" is not swaying public opinion like "quid pro quo" didn't, are you going to change the charge and its name a third time?

    I am embarrassed for you counselor.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-not-call-it-a-bribe-democrats-have-focus-group-tested-their-impeachment-strategy-for-maximum-effect

    Democrats shelved “quid pro quo” after private polling found “bribery” packed more of a punch with survey respondents.

    “[T]he Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted focus groups in key House battlegrounds in recent weeks, testing messages related to impeachment,” the Washington Post reports. “Among the questions put to participants was whether ‘quid pro quo,’ ‘extortion’ or ‘bribery’ was a more compelling description of Trump’s conduct.”
    The question of whether the public gives a shit is all very interesting and all, but you’re raising it to avoid the merits.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,002
    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    HHusky said:

    Bendintheriver said:

    Wow. Professor Karlan almost looks and sounds like a far left rat. Imagine that.

    Schitf allowed 3 far left rats and one more middle of the road dem to be present at the hearings.

    Sounds real fair now doesn't it.

    If a Democrat tells Atl bribery is crime, does it suddenly become a doubtful proposition?
    Well that depends on if a dem focus group thought "bribery" sounded better than "quid pro quo". Which is the crime HH? Do you need Stretch to go back and focus group again so that you rats can figure out just what you are trying to impeach the guy for again? If the second focus group tells you that "bribery" is not swaying public opinion like "quid pro quo" didn't, are you going to change the charge and its name a third time?

    I am embarrassed for you counselor.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/why-not-call-it-a-bribe-democrats-have-focus-group-tested-their-impeachment-strategy-for-maximum-effect

    Democrats shelved “quid pro quo” after private polling found “bribery” packed more of a punch with survey respondents.

    “[T]he Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee conducted focus groups in key House battlegrounds in recent weeks, testing messages related to impeachment,” the Washington Post reports. “Among the questions put to participants was whether ‘quid pro quo,’ ‘extortion’ or ‘bribery’ was a more compelling description of Trump’s conduct.”
    The question of whether the public gives a shit is all very interesting and all, but you’re raising it to avoid the merits.
    There are no merits. The fact the leaders of your party have to "focus group" what term/accusation resonates more with public opinion "quid pro quo" or "bribery" or "extortion" (all three separate things) means this is not based on any facts. As a matter of fact, not one fact was revealed in these hearings. Not one person testified that they had first hand knowledge of anything.

    The entire debacle is based upon democrat hand selected third party hearsay contributors. That democrats blocked the Republicans from their line of questioning, access to the supposed whistle blower, and denied Republicans the right to call their own witnesses is all a sane and fair minded individual needs to know. This is third world politics being played out by rat leadership.

    The absurdity that you party leadership has to "focus group" what Trump should be charged with based upon what terminology resonates with the public better is just shit frosting on top of a rat turd.

    Like I said counselor, I am embarrassed for you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,999
    As a reminder, Nadler has been planning for over a year to impeach before Ukraine was on the radar, as he unknowingly revealed on a train ride:

    https://thefederalist.com/2018/11/07/incoming-democrat-chairman-dems-will-go-all-in-on-russia-impeach-kavanaugh-for-perjury/#.XeZsys-OwBI.twitter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    JFC. This is the judiciary committee you retards. They are opining on the impeachment inquiry report prepared by the intelligence committee for the purpose of drafting articles of impeachment. Only trump trash think they are there to provide evidential testimony. They are article 2 experts proving guidance on drafting articles of impeachment.

    Here’s your daily reminder as well: trump’s getting impeached. Any day now.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,726 Founders Club
    Bendintheriver said:

    HoustonHusky said:

    Gaetz just embarrassed one of them...


    "If you have personal knowledge of one single fact in the shitf report, please raise your hand"

    Not one of their hands were raised yet three of them FEEL that Trump should be impeached.

    FFS. Campus liberals, meet reality and fact.
    Why do they keep EXONERATING Trump?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,682 Standard Supporter
    Commies!

    Treason!

    Arrest them!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Trumptard impeachment tears are delicious.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Alexis said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:



    Here’s your daily reminder as well: trump’s getting impeached. Any day now.

    Sounds serious
    Gauging from the trump trash responses in this thread, it does sound serious.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Trumptards aren’t taking impeachment well. Sad.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,682 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Trumptards aren’t taking impeachment well. Sad.

    Impeachment without conviction is meaningless.

    Losing the house and Trump being back in office you won't come out of the basement for a decade. The good news is old people will have more money you can fleece them for.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,047 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    JFC. This is the judiciary committee you retards. They are opining on the impeachment inquiry report prepared by the intelligence committee for the purpose of drafting articles of impeachment. Only trump trash think they are there to provide evidential testimony. They are article 2 experts proving guidance on drafting articles of impeachment.

    Here’s your daily reminder as well: trump’s getting impeached. Any day now.

    Oh right, there's been lots of that then already I suppose.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    JFC. This is the judiciary committee you retards. They are opining on the impeachment inquiry report prepared by the intelligence committee for the purpose of drafting articles of impeachment. Only trump trash think they are there to provide evidential testimony. They are article 2 experts proving guidance on drafting articles of impeachment.

    Here’s your daily reminder as well: trump’s getting impeached. Any day now.

    Oh right, there's been lots of that then already I suppose.
    You can continue to ignore it right up until the articles of impeachment are approved.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter