How is that recession coming along O'Keefed?

Comments
-
The recession historically starts 12-24 months after the yield curve inverts, but not every time. It inverted in 1998 briefly without a recession. How did I know you'd be ignorant about this topic as well.SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
-
Yeah, get your Econ info from Hondo. Makes sense. If you like to hear from economic illiterates2001400ex said:
The recession historically starts 12-24 months after the yield curve inverts, but not every time. It inverted in 1998 briefly without a recession. How did I know you'd be ignorant about this topic as well.SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
-
It's facts. But you hate facts, so there's that.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, get your Econ info from Hondo. Makes sense. If you like to hear from economic illiterates2001400ex said:
The recession historically starts 12-24 months after the yield curve inverts, but not every time. It inverted in 1998 briefly without a recession. How did I know you'd be ignorant about this topic as well.SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
-
No. I just hate you. Idiot2001400ex said:
It's facts. But you hate facts, so there's that.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, get your Econ info from Hondo. Makes sense. If you like to hear from economic illiterates2001400ex said:
The recession historically starts 12-24 months after the yield curve inverts, but not every time. It inverted in 1998 briefly without a recession. How did I know you'd be ignorant about this topic as well.SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
-
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam? -
Strong words Lil Man. You and your bartender have a laugh over it?MikeDamone said:
No. I just hate you. Idiot2001400ex said:
It's facts. But you hate facts, so there's that.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, get your Econ info from Hondo. Makes sense. If you like to hear from economic illiterates2001400ex said:
The recession historically starts 12-24 months after the yield curve inverts, but not every time. It inverted in 1998 briefly without a recession. How did I know you'd be ignorant about this topic as well.SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
-
The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
Many have made it clear. Watermelons. Green on the outside RED on the inside!Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
Tantrum Tavern today
-
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
Lol um no. You've known them long enough to know that's not true.DerekJohnson said:
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
My tune is things are much better under Trump than the previous admin. Economy, threats to my constitutional rights and the nation, we are better off.DerekJohnson said:
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on.
That's my tune. -
No. Eat shit.2001400ex said:
Strong words Lil Man. You and your bartender have a laugh over it?MikeDamone said:
No. I just hate you. Idiot2001400ex said:
It's facts. But you hate facts, so there's that.MikeDamone said:
Yeah, get your Econ info from Hondo. Makes sense. If you like to hear from economic illiterates2001400ex said:
The recession historically starts 12-24 months after the yield curve inverts, but not every time. It inverted in 1998 briefly without a recession. How did I know you'd be ignorant about this topic as well.SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
-
You receive welfare from taxpayers based on your service in a public sector union.Sledog said:
My tune is things are much better under Trump than the previous admin. Economy, threats to my constitutional rights and the nation, we are better off.DerekJohnson said:
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on.
That's my tune. -
It's like you never fully comprehend what people mean in their posts, but instead take a few words and change the subject.Sledog said:
My tune is things are much better under Trump than the previous admin. Economy, threats to my constitutional rights and the nation, we are better off.DerekJohnson said:
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on.
That's my tune. -
It's like your clueless while reading my posts.creepycoug said:
It's like you never fully comprehend what people mean in their posts, but instead take a few words and change the subject.Sledog said:
My tune is things are much better under Trump than the previous admin. Economy, threats to my constitutional rights and the nation, we are better off.DerekJohnson said:
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on.
That's my tune.
-
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam? -
I wasn't doing that but sweet strawman ass fuck O'Keefed.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
What tune would that be? I wasn't touting strong GDP growth, that's O'Keefed strawman ass fuck.DerekJohnson said:
IMO, Sledog and SFGBob would be singing a different tune, but Damone and Race would be saying the same things.HHusky said:
I don’t have to imagine what you gals would be saying about a GDP growth under 1% if the President had a D next to his name.Blu82 said:The leftards just can't stand the fact that Americans are prospering.
Makes you wonder what side they are on. -
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
You posted an article about the coming recession. You now lie and claim that wasn't a position you agreed with. You compounded that lie by claiming I was touting the GDP numbers.HHusky said:
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
Who says I disagree with the article? This is about your bullshit. And having ridiculed the notion that a recession is imminent, you are necessarily saying that our “robust” 0.3% GDP growth proves your point. You’re not smart, blob.SFGbob said:
You posted an article about the coming recession. You now lie and claim that wasn't a position you agreed with. You compounded that lie by claiming I was touting the GDP numbers.HHusky said:
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
We're not in a recession now and we won't be in one by the end of the year despite your hopes and predictions to the contrary.HHusky said:
Who says I disagree with the article? This is about your bullshit. And having ridiculed the notion that a recession is imminent, you are necessarily saying that our “robust” 0.3% GDP growth proves your point. You’re not smart, blob.SFGbob said:
You posted an article about the coming recession. You now lie and claim that wasn't a position you agreed with. You compounded that lie by claiming I was touting the GDP numbers.HHusky said:
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
We’ve already established you lied about my “prediction”, Ambassador Sondland.SFGbob said:
We're not in a recession now and we won't be in one by the end of the year despite your hopes and predictions to the contrary.HHusky said:
Who says I disagree with the article? This is about your bullshit. And having ridiculed the notion that a recession is imminent, you are necessarily saying that our “robust” 0.3% GDP growth proves your point. You’re not smart, blob.SFGbob said:
You posted an article about the coming recession. You now lie and claim that wasn't a position you agreed with. You compounded that lie by claiming I was touting the GDP numbers.HHusky said:
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
Yes, yes. You posted an article that was predicting a recession by the beginning of next year but you didn't agree with the article you posted even though you never said that. Amazing how similar you are to Hondo.HHusky said:
We’ve already established you lied about my “prediction”, Ambassador Sondland.SFGbob said:
We're not in a recession now and we won't be in one by the end of the year despite your hopes and predictions to the contrary.HHusky said:
Who says I disagree with the article? This is about your bullshit. And having ridiculed the notion that a recession is imminent, you are necessarily saying that our “robust” 0.3% GDP growth proves your point. You’re not smart, blob.SFGbob said:
You posted an article about the coming recession. You now lie and claim that wasn't a position you agreed with. You compounded that lie by claiming I was touting the GDP numbers.HHusky said:
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it. -
You’re changing your testimony again, Ambassador.SFGbob said:
Yes, yes. You posted an article that was predicting a recession by the beginning of next year but you didn't agree with the article you posted even though you never said that. Amazing how similar you are to Hondo.HHusky said:
We’ve already established you lied about my “prediction”, Ambassador Sondland.SFGbob said:
We're not in a recession now and we won't be in one by the end of the year despite your hopes and predictions to the contrary.HHusky said:
Who says I disagree with the article? This is about your bullshit. And having ridiculed the notion that a recession is imminent, you are necessarily saying that our “robust” 0.3% GDP growth proves your point. You’re not smart, blob.SFGbob said:
You posted an article about the coming recession. You now lie and claim that wasn't a position you agreed with. You compounded that lie by claiming I was touting the GDP numbers.HHusky said:
So your defense for lying is that I agree with an article that said something else. Giuliani your lawyer?SFGbob said:
Like Hondo, O"keefed posts articles he obviously agrees with but also like Hondo his is too big a Kunt to say so. You were all in on the coming recession Kunt of course you now lie about it just like you lied and claimed I was crowing about 1% growth.HHusky said:
Right. Linking an article pointing out that the wealthy are moving to cash because they expect a recession by the end of 2020 is exactly like predicting a recession by the end of 2019. Oh, and the inverted yield curve has never been any part of my discussions on this topic.SFGbob said:
No, I'm mocking a dumbfuck who was dancing around here just a few months back saying we would be in a recession by the first of the year.HHusky said:
https://www.frbatlanta.org/cqer/research/gdpnow.aspx?panel=1SFGbob said:Oh no, what about the inverted yield curve!!!!
Are you crowing about this economy for some bizarre reason, Madam?
You’ve really lost it . . . to the modest extent you ever had it.