Why won't they testify?
Comments
-
You would have seen it and been a grand poorer but your'e a pussy.2001400ex said:
Your ignorance is showing even more with this comment. It's almost like you are an ex mall cop that doesn't have a basic understanding of taxes.Sledog said:
You'll be surprised. More so than paying 79k for a truck.2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right -
I'm at wake up call in front of the F5 building right now. I'm here any time.Sledog said:
You would have seen it and been a grand poorer but your'e a pussy.2001400ex said:
Your ignorance is showing even more with this comment. It's almost like you are an ex mall cop that doesn't have a basic understanding of taxes.Sledog said:
You'll be surprised. More so than paying 79k for a truck.2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right
That being said. The tax situation I'm discussing right now has to do with my pickup. Which you clearly not only don't understand, it flew right over your head. -
I do find it humorous that Hondo the fucking Kunt with absolutely nothing at stake is always refusing to back up his twat of mouth here and answer questions that are put to him.
-
Dude you have to make money before you pay taxes. HTH2001400ex said:
I'm at wake up call in front of the F5 building right now. I'm here any time.Sledog said:
You would have seen it and been a grand poorer but your'e a pussy.2001400ex said:
Your ignorance is showing even more with this comment. It's almost like you are an ex mall cop that doesn't have a basic understanding of taxes.Sledog said:
You'll be surprised. More so than paying 79k for a truck.2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right
That being said. The tax situation I'm discussing right now has to do with my pickup. Which you clearly not only don't understand, it flew right over your head. -
I recall the Obama State Department stonewalling the investigation and refusing to produce subpoenaed materials. I recall Hillary destroying evidence. I recall Holder refusing to testify.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too. -
The fact that hondo is still enraged over Benghazi tells you how effective the investigation was
He still melts down over it daily -
Exactly what question am I ignoring? Idiot.SFGbob said:I do find it humorous that Hondo the fucking Kunt with absolutely nothing at stake is always refusing to back up his twat of mouth here and answer questions that are put to him.
-
Sick burn bro.Sledog said:
Dude you have to make money before you pay taxes. HTH2001400ex said:
I'm at wake up call in front of the F5 building right now. I'm here any time.Sledog said:
You would have seen it and been a grand poorer but your'e a pussy.2001400ex said:
Your ignorance is showing even more with this comment. It's almost like you are an ex mall cop that doesn't have a basic understanding of taxes.Sledog said:
You'll be surprised. More so than paying 79k for a truck.2001400ex said:
That was supposed to come out weeks ago. One of two things will happen. It'll come out and will be a nothingburger. Or it will never come out, they will string out simpletons like you through the election then the coverage will be dropped from your news source.Sledog said:
Funny you should mention that:2001400ex said:
Barr is going to drop the hammer any day now.Sledog said:
Fix was in. Obama.2001400ex said:
During the Benghazi hearings, do you remember Hillary testifying? Do you recall Obama saying witnesses couldn't testify?DoogieMcDoogerson said:The answer to your question is when it's an unfair, manipulated, process, people choose not to participate. It's simple, really. Same thing would happen if either Biden was called to testify.
I'll come back to this? What's the big fucking deal? Is it because Biden's running for president? In negotiations, there is always going to be some arm twisting. Of course it's about Biden running for president. That's what the dems are latched onto.
So answer me this. So Biden gets a pass on this because he's running for president? I don't think so.2001400ex said:
You still won't answer the question. If Trump is innocent, why won't his people testify to prove its a sham?DoogieMcDoogerson said:
It's related to this being a sham. Why cooperate when the other side is clearly trying to influence the outcome? You'd think Hunter and Joe would love to clear their names.2001400ex said:
That's not the question. Not surprised you are all look "look over there!!!".DoogieMcDoogerson said:Why won't Schiff let the Bidens be called as witnesses?
This feels very similar to "Hillary's Emails" The outrage was about how the emails were obtained. ( Process ) When the emails themselves were quite damning. Media never focused on that. This shit isn't hard. It isn't an accident.
My viewpoint is why cooperate when the opposing side is playing dirty.
Look at yesterday. Closed door hearing to "try out" a witness before being interviewed in front of public. No transcript provided. Meanwhile CNN posting all sorts of information about what happened in that closed door session.
You wanna do this? Do it right or you'll get people resisting participating because it is a sham.
Be careful when you answer. You already said the same about Biden.... Reread what you wrote. And from what I've seen, Schiff hasn't officially denied any witness yet.
You keep avoiding the question. Trump is the subject matter here and he's keeping his people from testifying. If he's truly innocent, then they should have no problems answering questions. Republicans get equal time for questioning.
If Biden is guilty, Barr can investigate him all he wishes. Or the Senate can open an investigation. That's a separate matter, go after him all you want. The difference between you and I.... If Biden is guilty I want him gone too.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ratcliffe-on-ig-report-doesnt-take-500-pages-to-say-everything-was-done-right
That being said. The tax situation I'm discussing right now has to do with my pickup. Which you clearly not only don't understand, it flew right over your head. -
Right. Or I'm using it to make you look like an idiot.RaceBannon said:The fact that hondo is still enraged over Benghazi tells you how effective the investigation was
He still melts down over it daily -
Yeah, and if anyone ever mentions Hillary or Obama he cries like a little bitch about how they are bringing up the past. Hell Hondo the stupid Kunt was crying when people were talking about Hunter Biden in connection with this Ukraine story.RaceBannon said:The fact that hondo is still enraged over Benghazi tells you how effective the investigation was
He still melts down over it daily
