I'm hearing quid pro quo is out


Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump
Comments
-
This is exactly how bad it’s going for trump in the impeachment inquiry.
-
Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.
-
Yep really badCirrhosisDawg said:This is exactly how bad it’s going for trump in the impeachment inquiry.
The sham is collapsing
Hurts Trump bigly -
Yeah HH caught wind of what to say and is now addressing it as "extortion".RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
HHusky said:
Bribery is quid pro quo. Don’t quit your day “job”.
We have the transcript of the call. No quid pro quo
So the pivot to bribery
Nothing there either
The change was for the low information team hondo -
I’m a little hurt you haven’t been reading my stuff for the past couple of months.Bendintheriver said:
Yeah HH caught wind of what to say and is now addressing it as "extortion".RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
-
State Department official George Kent testified Wednesday that he would “love” to see Ukraine look into the circumstances surrounding the closure of a probe tied to natural gas firm Burisma Holdings, while also raising concerns that Hunter Biden’s role on the board of that firm created the appearance of a conflict of interest.
Sounds like Kent agrees that Biden isn't above the law -
It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.
Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls... -
It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.HoustonHusky said:It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.
Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls... -
The people with first hand knowledge have already said there was no threat
Or bribery
Or quid pro quo
The transcript showed that when Trump released it -
None of your witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why do you think that is cirrhosis? If they supposedly heard this information third hand, they certainly must know who heard it first hand. Again, why do you think that is cirrhosis?CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.HoustonHusky said:It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.
Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls... -
-
Works in court......Dude61 said:I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley -
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.Dude61 said:I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
-
All the adults read the transcript. Not sure what Jennifer said to you.CirrhosisDawg said:
It’s going so horribly for trump that he’s ordered anyone with first hand knowledge not to testify.HoustonHusky said:It’s going so well for the Democrats they have now resorted to claiming hearsay is better than direct evidence.
Further proof they have the mentality of teenage girls...
Teenage girls... -
We already know what the first hand witnesses saidHHusky said:
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.Dude61 said:I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
No quid pro quo
-
Imagine claiming you have a whistleblower then crying because people who actually heard the call said nothing is there
And your whistleblower is nowhere to be found -
Of course there was a quid pro quo. “Get over it.”RaceBannon said:
We already know what the first hand witnesses saidHHusky said:
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.Dude61 said:I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
No quid pro quo -
I touched a sensitive nerve here in trumptard land. Trump’s plumbers ignore subpoenas (Barr’s DOJ won’t enforce and court resolution would take months) and trump’s impeached with additional articles of obstruction. Or they could testify and clear everything up with first hand knowledge, right trumptards?
-
It was clear when the transcript was released
So we have another pivot now. You have nothing but Trump won't let people testify
Just embarrassing
For you -
Link?HHusky said:
Of course there was a quid pro quo. “Get over it.”RaceBannon said:
We already know what the first hand witnesses saidHHusky said:
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.Dude61 said:I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley
No quid pro quo -
Oh it's still in and Republicans aren't even denying it any more, the new talking point is "quid pro quo isn't impeachable". Try to catch up, Boomer.RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
Fake investigations beget fake subpoenas. They should be jailed! Oh the subpoenas have no force of law.....HHusky said:
That was cringy. The better point is that this an investigation, not a trial. Hearsay is used all the time in order to discover admissible evidence. The folks bitching about hearsay know that. They also know that the White House has instructed the first hand witnesses not to testify—though Mulvaney gave the game away on your teevee.Dude61 said:I am being told there is plenty of good evidence:
"Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct [evidence]." – Democrat Rep. Mike Quigley -
Pathological liarinsinceredawg said:
Oh it's still in and Republicans aren't even denying it any more, the new talking point is "quid pro quo isn't impeachable". Try to catch up, Boomer.RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
Senile dumbfuck BoomerRaceBannon said:
Pathological liarinsinceredawg said:
Oh it's still in and Republicans aren't even denying it any more, the new talking point is "quid pro quo isn't impeachable". Try to catch up, Boomer.RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
Faggotinsinceredawg said:
Senile dumbfuck BoomerRaceBannon said:
Pathological liarinsinceredawg said:
Oh it's still in and Republicans aren't even denying it any more, the new talking point is "quid pro quo isn't impeachable". Try to catch up, Boomer.RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
Good one! You really got me there, boomer.RaceBannon said:
Faggotinsinceredawg said:
Senile dumbfuck BoomerRaceBannon said:
Pathological liarinsinceredawg said:
Oh it's still in and Republicans aren't even denying it any more, the new talking point is "quid pro quo isn't impeachable". Try to catch up, Boomer.RaceBannon said:Now its bribery to investigate criminal behavior by a Democrat
Because no aid was withheld or threatened
But Trump -
FFS please tell everyone here you aren't touching yourself between posts.CirrhosisDawg said:I touched a sensitive nerve here