It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
Don’t talk to me about the bedroom you fucking pussy. I reproduced and my genes live on. You can’t carry on the species Pup watching fat DIII soccer chicks hit a dildo.
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
Don’t talk to me about the bedroom you fucking pussy. I reproduced and my genes live on. You can’t carry on the species Pup watching fat DIII soccer chicks hit a dildo.
Huh? Ive got white, half black kids. Probably many others i have no clue about. See pup's legend just ended a few years ago, and still got more strange in that span.
After the hetro light went on that magical night at neighbors, when your wife and her sorority sisters decided to be 'edgy' and go to the club, u discovered the giner, instantly fell in love bla bla. Should have tried before you tied 1st.
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
Don’t talk to me about the bedroom you fucking pussy. I reproduced and my genes live on. You can’t carry on the species Pup watching fat DIII soccer chicks hit a dildo.
Huh? Ive got white, half black kids. Probably many others i have no clue about. See pup's legend just ended a few years ago, and still got more strange in that span.
After the hetro light went on that magical night at neighbors, when your wife and her sorority sisters decided to be 'edgy' and go to the club, u discovered the giner, instantly fell in love bla bla. Should have tried before you tied 1st.
So it’s the child support payments then which prevent you from chipping in to Stalin?
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Dont really like DM or DP for forums but I hung around BD2W for a while and it has potential when they figure out the website stuff. If they do I think I'll probably go there more when were winning and here when were losing
I would respect row boat a lot more if they got off the boat in Germany and won the war before it started. Sack some villages and take some gold yella. Then I will be impressed!
I would respect row boat a lot more if they got off the boat in Germany and won the war before it started. Sack some villages and take some gold yella. Then I will be impressed!
I blame Jesus. He made our? tall Vikings too civilized. Hammer of the gods Vikings, sweeping with threshing oar sacked all they wanted.
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
Yes u are correct. Its dawgman 80% and the rest are looney tunes. Told Stalin a HDB could propel this site to respectability, along with a front page with a weekly Puppy article.
He chose what is currently available. Life support. Pup saves websites, businesses...i offered pro-bono
I went to full site on mobile and found article. Here it is:
"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER. He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then . Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
I would respect row boat a lot more if they got off the boat in Germany and won the war before it started. Sack some villages and take some gold yella. Then I will be impressed!
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
Yes u are correct. Its dawgman 80% and the rest are looney tunes. Told Stalin a HDB could propel this site to respectability, along with a front page with a weekly Puppy article.
He chose what is currently available. Life support. Pup saves websites, businesses...i offered pro-bono
I went to full site on mobile and found article. Here it is:
"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER. He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then . Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-Puppylove
Imagine actually caring about what Fetters’ writes and being proud of Fetters supposedly plagiarizing your shit.
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
Yes u are correct. Its dawgman 80% and the rest are looney tunes. Told Stalin a HDB could propel this site to respectability, along with a front page with a weekly Puppy article.
He chose what is currently available. Life support. Pup saves websites, businesses...i offered pro-bono
I went to full site on mobile and found article. Here it is:
"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER. He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then . Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-Puppylove
Imagine actually caring about what Fetters’ writes and being proud of Fetters supposedly plagiarizing your shit.
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
Yes u are correct. Its dawgman 80% and the rest are looney tunes. Told Stalin a HDB could propel this site to respectability, along with a front page with a weekly Puppy article.
He chose what is currently available. Life support. Pup saves websites, businesses...i offered pro-bono
I went to full site on mobile and found article. Here it is:
"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER. He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then . Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-Puppylove
Imagine actually caring about what Fetters’ writes and being proud of Fetters supposedly plagiarizing your shit.
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
Don’t talk to me about the bedroom you fucking pussy. I reproduced and my genes live on. You can’t carry on the species Pup watching fat DIII soccer chicks hit a dildo.
If we’re going to start bashing fat Division III soccer chicks hitting a vibrator, I’m out!
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
It’s basically a microcosm of Pete’s offense. Tons of potential and should be good...but execution is confounding and leaves much to be desired.
They have some talented guys over there. But as I've said from Day 1, there was never a need for another Husky site. It's too crowded of a market place already.
Have to disagree. There are plenty of occasions where this site has a hard time having a real discussion on a subject and the minority that want to tend to be overrun by 4channess a lot of the time.
I don't know, man. The other sites are boring as fuck. Dawgman and UW Dawg Pound are snooze fests. BD2W was feeling the same way.
Snoozefest? Ive been around since the beginning, early 90's with dawgman, heckman. You yellow, dipshit, have been spewing semen on HH for 2 years. WTF do you know about a snoozefest (which your wife coined in bed).
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
Comments
This place a ragefest, snoozefest, fuckfest because of those like you. Take a bow coxswain
After the hetro light went on that magical night at neighbors, when your wife and her sorority sisters decided to be 'edgy' and go to the club, u discovered the giner, instantly fell in love bla bla. Should have tried before you tied 1st.
I went to full site on mobile and found article. Here it is:
"Fetters, Jude...the CNN of husky football"
Who's worse, Adam Jude or Chris Fetters? One, a sleazy Jim Acosta type, trying to produce a 'gotcha moment' on Chris Petersen, the other a typical low-budget writer for 20 years, trying to be relevant. One for the Seattle Times (a husky-hating Barbara Hedges lover, title IX advocate , trying desperately for 30 years to destroy husky football in favor of womens' basketball and softball)...the other a politically correct, totalitarian-run website , where Kim Grinolds (the content boss) ban's any user he disagree's with regarding husky football. For instance, if you don't like the way Jake Browning is playing, don't say a word...you'll be looking for a new platform like Hardcore Husky to convey your views and opinions. HardcoreHusky.com let's you speak your mind, share your opinions without permanent banishment from the website. Oh, it's free to join too. Derek Johnson, the CEO, is a true and lifelong husky fan who encourages passionate discussion of husky football
Chris Fetters, walked then jumped off the Husky plank immediately following the 'loss' 'at' Auburn. He wrote an overtly dramatic and ignorant piece on the front page of dawgman.com, in hurried fashion for page views immediately following the game, claiming the Huskies, and to a similar degree the Pac 12 chances at making the College Football Playoff, are essentially OVER!!!! Yup, he said it.
He should know that the national title, in any era (AP/Coaches, bcs, playoff) has NEVER been decided on Sept 1st. EVER.
He's responsible now for a tired and lazy argument, just reiterating the SEC-friendly, ESPN-paid narrative established by everyone west of the majestic Rocky Mountain range. When it comes time for the committee to choose teams in December, UW won even though they lost. This is a really good football team and they know it. They all watched it. No worries dawgfans, as Puppylove assumed and posted to Hardcore Husky late Saturday night, the AP would recognize UW's efforts. They dropped them only a few spots to #9 in the country, not out of the top 25 where Chris Fetters led his readers at Dawgman to believe.
Everyone is going to lose but Alabama, maybe Clemson. If UW takes care of business in the pac12, however challenging, they are a shoe-in for the playoff.. Fetters seemed to indicate otherwise, because he wanted to create page views by manufactured controversy. Wont help. Fetters and I go back a long ways, and Pup always mops the floor with his ignorant views on Husky football, and college football in general. Of course all he just had to do was hit the ban button everytime I had a dissenting opinion, like everyone at dawgman has done through the years, which spawned HardcoreHusky.
Despite Fetters view, This game isnt a referendum on the pac12. It's quite the opposite. Cincinnati and Arizona's ineptitude certainly didnt help the pac 12, but it's a long season, and UCLA will get a lot better with DTR at QB.. A lot of football yet to be played. USC, Stanford and to a lesser extent Utah are still very much in playoff race as well and has NOTHING TO DO WITH UW LOSS (a WIN in my eyes,down the road with the committee, and others who understand college football. )
The ACC is clearly the worst conference in football, a 1-team league. If Clemson stumbles in conference, which they have a significant propensity to do (if you've followed college football longer than 10 years) they're done and NOT Washington and the pac12. The ACC doesnt have a Stanford, USC, UTAH or Oregon (had ducks decided to play somebody) this year. They have nobody. Florida State, the ACC's #2' got heavily reamed by a gutted, very average ACC team in Virginia Tech. A team on par with say Washington St or Arizona St.
USC and Stanford play big games still. Stanford has a legit shot at playoff even with pac12 loss early. Just beat ND, UW. USC is In even with loss at texas. Just run table, beat ND. Utah...run table they're in. So it's really not as dire as Mr. Fetters led us to believe. It would sure help everybody if USC beat Texas, but a tall order with an 18 year-old at qb.
Texas and Oklahoma are catching the pac12 at the right time. USC and UCLA are both starting true freshmen at QB respectively (should Chip Kelly go with Thompson-Robinson) T-R is going to be a great qb. He is the real deal. The committee understands this. They realize the ACC is a dumpster deposit, and the pac 12, with USC's JT Daniels and UCLA's Dorian Thompson-Robinson, are still better than FSU and VT with whoever they trot out, including Francois. USC, the pac12's 4th best team in Puppy's mind, is still better than the ACC's 2nd, 3rd, 4th.....
So fetters, the pac12 is far from out of the playoff in week 1. Its all about the timing of the losses by other teams, and who they lose to.
And Jude? You are irrelevant in this town. Ted Miller, who was decent at best, still was twice the reporter you are. Crawl out your plush Tacoma crack house on Hill Top and actually cover a Husky practice. And with your credentials, actually cover a game with knowledge of the players, their #'s, heights, weights etc.. how long do you expect to get away with winging this husky football thing? Your blatant disrespect and disregard of Chris Petersen's injury protocol hasnt been duplicated since the Don James era, over 30 years ago. It's why UW coaches dont trust the Seattle Times. Don James got burned by smug, disrespectful reporter just like yourself regarding a particular QB and an jnjury then .
Take a bow punk, the media has come full circle, and you're to blame. Like Jim Acosta at CNN, I hope Petersen doesnt call upon during presser's like Sarah Sanders doesnt Acosta ... I certainly wouldnt...!
-Puppylove