Oregon State’s offensive no-show against Washington was a collective effort, says Jonathan Smith
Comments
-
Bullshit...you can lose at the line of scrimmage most times and still find a way to work around it. However, you can’t get plungered play after play at the line of scrimmage. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen an Oline get manhandled like that. UW probably could have had 15 sacks had UW not dominated time of possession.
People wonder why Luton didn’t try and go deep. No five reasons here, just one needed.
It’s always difficult to throw a deep pattern when you only have 2 seconds to throw the ball. -
our? offensive no-show against Washington was a collective effort, says chip peterman
also would have worked as a story. -
Throwing 28 passes for 88 yards is still horrible. They went in with a dink and dunk plan which plays into UW’s style of defense.greenblood said:Bullshit...you can lose at the line of scrimmage most times and still find a way to work around it. However, you can’t get plungered play after play at the line of scrimmage. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen an Oline get manhandled like that. UW probably could have had 15 sacks had UW not dominated time of possession.
People wonder why Luton didn’t try and go deep. No five reasons here, just one needed.
It’s always difficult to throw a deep pattern when you only have 2 seconds to throw the ball. -
They had to do that. Every time they tried to throw deep, Luton got sacked.RoadDawg55 said:
Throwing 28 passes for 88 yards is still horrible. They went in with a dink and dunk plan which plays into UW’s style of defense.greenblood said:Bullshit...you can lose at the line of scrimmage most times and still find a way to work around it. However, you can’t get plungered play after play at the line of scrimmage. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen an Oline get manhandled like that. UW probably could have had 15 sacks had UW not dominated time of possession.
People wonder why Luton didn’t try and go deep. No five reasons here, just one needed.
It’s always difficult to throw a deep pattern when you only have 2 seconds to throw the ball. -
Someone was paying attention. Roaddoog has no clue as usual.greenblood said:
They had to do that. Every time they tried to throw deep, Luton got sacked.RoadDawg55 said:
Throwing 28 passes for 88 yards is still horrible. They went in with a dink and dunk plan which plays into UW’s style of defense.greenblood said:Bullshit...you can lose at the line of scrimmage most times and still find a way to work around it. However, you can’t get plungered play after play at the line of scrimmage. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen an Oline get manhandled like that. UW probably could have had 15 sacks had UW not dominated time of possession.
People wonder why Luton didn’t try and go deep. No five reasons here, just one needed.
It’s always difficult to throw a deep pattern when you only have 2 seconds to throw the ball.
