Trumptards got their talking points for today
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepxk/the-gop-wants-you-to-believe-alex-vindman-isnt-loyal-because-he-was-born-in-ukraine?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Republican politicians and cable news "experts" have a new talking point about President Trump’s Ukraine scandal: If you weren’t born in the U.S., the government shouldn’t trust your testimony.
On Tuesday, White House official Alexander Vindman will tell a House committee that he was present for Trump’s now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and that he considered it so harmful to U.S. interests he twice reported the call to a superior.
Vindman, a lieutenant colonel and Purple Heart recipient who is the National Security Council’s expert on Ukraine, noted in his opening statement that he'd fled to the U.S. with his family from Ukraine as a refugee when he was 3 years old.
The GOP now wants to use that fact to discredit Vindman’s testimony.
"It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don't know that he's concerned about American policy,” former Rep. Sean Duffy, a Tea Party Republican from Wisconsin, said on CNN this morning.
(Duffy, a paid political commentator for CNN, is also a known conspiracy theorist, who has tried to downplay Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black churchgoers in 2015, and previously claimed that an aide to Hillary Clinton has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.)
Comments
-
And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
We have the transcript. Who cares what gets leaked from Schiff
-
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
Vice is your source? Might as well let Natural News weigh in here as well.insinceredawg said:We all know 95% of this board will eat this conspiracy up
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepxk/the-gop-wants-you-to-believe-alex-vindman-isnt-loyal-because-he-was-born-in-ukraine?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Republican politicians and cable news "experts" have a new talking point about President Trump’s Ukraine scandal: If you weren’t born in the U.S., the government shouldn’t trust your testimony.
On Tuesday, White House official Alexander Vindman will tell a House committee that he was present for Trump’s now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and that he considered it so harmful to U.S. interests he twice reported the call to a superior.
Vindman, a lieutenant colonel and Purple Heart recipient who is the National Security Council’s expert on Ukraine, noted in his opening statement that he'd fled to the U.S. with his family from Ukraine as a refugee when he was 3 years old.
The GOP now wants to use that fact to discredit Vindman’s testimony.
"It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don't know that he's concerned about American policy,” former Rep. Sean Duffy, a Tea Party Republican from Wisconsin, said on CNN this morning.
(Duffy, a paid political commentator for CNN, is also a known conspiracy theorist, who has tried to downplay Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black churchgoers in 2015, and previously claimed that an aide to Hillary Clinton has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.) -
Is his testimony on TV? In HD?insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
Nancy is calling a vote because this isn't working
-
No, you're just lying.insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
pawz said:
Vice is your source? Might as well let Natural News weigh in here as well.insinceredawg said:We all know 95% of this board will eat this conspiracy up
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepxk/the-gop-wants-you-to-believe-alex-vindman-isnt-loyal-because-he-was-born-in-ukraine?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Republican politicians and cable news "experts" have a new talking point about President Trump’s Ukraine scandal: If you weren’t born in the U.S., the government shouldn’t trust your testimony.
On Tuesday, White House official Alexander Vindman will tell a House committee that he was present for Trump’s now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and that he considered it so harmful to U.S. interests he twice reported the call to a superior.
Vindman, a lieutenant colonel and Purple Heart recipient who is the National Security Council’s expert on Ukraine, noted in his opening statement that he'd fled to the U.S. with his family from Ukraine as a refugee when he was 3 years old.
The GOP now wants to use that fact to discredit Vindman’s testimony.
"It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don't know that he's concerned about American policy,” former Rep. Sean Duffy, a Tea Party Republican from Wisconsin, said on CNN this morning.
(Duffy, a paid political commentator for CNN, is also a known conspiracy theorist, who has tried to downplay Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black churchgoers in 2015, and previously claimed that an aide to Hillary Clinton has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.)
I thought you said the Dems were scared to vote because it would failRaceBannon said:
Is his testimony on TV? In HD?insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
Nancy is calling a vote because this isn't working -
But calling 3-star General Flynn a traitor is ok.insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
You thought wronginsinceredawg said:pawz said:
Vice is your source? Might as well let Natural News weigh in here as well.insinceredawg said:We all know 95% of this board will eat this conspiracy up
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepxk/the-gop-wants-you-to-believe-alex-vindman-isnt-loyal-because-he-was-born-in-ukraine?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Republican politicians and cable news "experts" have a new talking point about President Trump’s Ukraine scandal: If you weren’t born in the U.S., the government shouldn’t trust your testimony.
On Tuesday, White House official Alexander Vindman will tell a House committee that he was present for Trump’s now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and that he considered it so harmful to U.S. interests he twice reported the call to a superior.
Vindman, a lieutenant colonel and Purple Heart recipient who is the National Security Council’s expert on Ukraine, noted in his opening statement that he'd fled to the U.S. with his family from Ukraine as a refugee when he was 3 years old.
The GOP now wants to use that fact to discredit Vindman’s testimony.
"It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don't know that he's concerned about American policy,” former Rep. Sean Duffy, a Tea Party Republican from Wisconsin, said on CNN this morning.
(Duffy, a paid political commentator for CNN, is also a known conspiracy theorist, who has tried to downplay Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black churchgoers in 2015, and previously claimed that an aide to Hillary Clinton has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.)
I thought you said the Dems were scared to vote because it would failRaceBannon said:
Is his testimony on TV? In HD?insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
Nancy is calling a vote because this isn't working
I said zero for three scared to try for four because she was. The failure of Schiff yet again and the GOP refusal to cooperate forced her hand
Lot of dems still scared to vote but they will get in line
And it will done out in the open going forward saving you the trouble of posting leaks -
Unlike yourself who relies on sputnik news.pawz said:
Vice is your source? Might as well let Natural News weigh in here as well.insinceredawg said:We all know 95% of this board will eat this conspiracy up
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepxk/the-gop-wants-you-to-believe-alex-vindman-isnt-loyal-because-he-was-born-in-ukraine?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Republican politicians and cable news "experts" have a new talking point about President Trump’s Ukraine scandal: If you weren’t born in the U.S., the government shouldn’t trust your testimony.
On Tuesday, White House official Alexander Vindman will tell a House committee that he was present for Trump’s now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and that he considered it so harmful to U.S. interests he twice reported the call to a superior.
Vindman, a lieutenant colonel and Purple Heart recipient who is the National Security Council’s expert on Ukraine, noted in his opening statement that he'd fled to the U.S. with his family from Ukraine as a refugee when he was 3 years old.
The GOP now wants to use that fact to discredit Vindman’s testimony.
"It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don't know that he's concerned about American policy,” former Rep. Sean Duffy, a Tea Party Republican from Wisconsin, said on CNN this morning.
(Duffy, a paid political commentator for CNN, is also a known conspiracy theorist, who has tried to downplay Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black churchgoers in 2015, and previously claimed that an aide to Hillary Clinton has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.) -
.
Rely? Why do you hate the word 'if'?GDS said:
Unlike yourself who relies on sputnik news.pawz said:
Vice is your source? Might as well let Natural News weigh in here as well.insinceredawg said:We all know 95% of this board will eat this conspiracy up
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/xwepxk/the-gop-wants-you-to-believe-alex-vindman-isnt-loyal-because-he-was-born-in-ukraine?utm_source=vicenewstwitter
Republican politicians and cable news "experts" have a new talking point about President Trump’s Ukraine scandal: If you weren’t born in the U.S., the government shouldn’t trust your testimony.
On Tuesday, White House official Alexander Vindman will tell a House committee that he was present for Trump’s now infamous July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, and that he considered it so harmful to U.S. interests he twice reported the call to a superior.
Vindman, a lieutenant colonel and Purple Heart recipient who is the National Security Council’s expert on Ukraine, noted in his opening statement that he'd fled to the U.S. with his family from Ukraine as a refugee when he was 3 years old.
The GOP now wants to use that fact to discredit Vindman’s testimony.
"It seems very clear that he is incredibly concerned about Ukrainian defense. I don't know that he's concerned about American policy,” former Rep. Sean Duffy, a Tea Party Republican from Wisconsin, said on CNN this morning.
(Duffy, a paid political commentator for CNN, is also a known conspiracy theorist, who has tried to downplay Dylann Roof’s murder of nine black churchgoers in 2015, and previously claimed that an aide to Hillary Clinton has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood.)
I knew you would be triggered. As well as mocked. It worked. -
He’s a criminal, so yeah.Dude61 said:
But calling 3-star General Flynn a traitor is ok.insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
He has yet to have is day in court. It looks like the criminals were doing the prosecution but you government boot lickers don't seem to care. Just do what you're told and think what they tell you toThomasFremont said:
He’s a criminal, so yeah.Dude61 said:
But calling 3-star General Flynn a traitor is ok.insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
Yeah, his sentencing day in court after pleading guilty. He’s an admitted criminal.RaceBannon said:
He has yet to have is day in court. It looks like the criminals were doing the prosecution but you government boot lickers don't seem to care. Just do what you're told and think what they tell you toThomasFremont said:
He’s a criminal, so yeah.Dude61 said:
But calling 3-star General Flynn a traitor is ok.insinceredawg said:
Just trying to get ahead of you guys. As soon as he gives his testimony this board will be on damage control and trying to assassinate his character.SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist -
He plead guilty. HTH.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist -
Look at the mullertardCirrhosisDawg said:
He plead guilty. HTH.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist
The prosecution hid evidence to get him to do so -
And they threaten to prosecute his son. He took one for his family not because he was guilty but because the Government railroaded him and threatened his family. When the Judge tosses this entire sham case what's El Monte going to say then?RaceBannon said:
Look at the mullertardCirrhosisDawg said:
He plead guilty. HTH.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist
The prosecution hid evidence to get him to do so -
They both hid evidence and manufactured evidence.RaceBannon said:
Look at the mullertardCirrhosisDawg said:
He plead guilty. HTH.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist
The prosecution hid evidence to get him to do so -
I am sure you believe that.RaceBannon said:
Look at the mullertardCirrhosisDawg said:
He plead guilty. HTH.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist
The prosecution hid evidence to get him to do so -
Same thing I said after the Covington libel and California sanctuary state law decisions: you are a blithering fool.SFGbob said:
And they threaten to prosecute his son. He took one for his family not because he was guilty but because the Government railroaded him and threatened his family. When the Judge tosses this entire sham case what's El Monte going to say then?RaceBannon said:
Look at the mullertardCirrhosisDawg said:
He plead guilty. HTH.RaceBannon said:https://foxnews.com/politics/flynn-hearing-canceled-after-lawyer-claims-fbi-manipulated-files
Hiding exculpatory evidence is special
Lick that boot statist
The prosecution hid evidence to get him to do so -
The Judge in the Flynn case just cancelled the upcoming hearing that was scheduled to hear the Motion to Compel the production of exculpatory materials by the prosecution.
The Judge essentially said that the briefing filed by both parties was enough and that he didn't need to have a hearing to rule on the matter. Flynn's counsel accused the Feds of falsifying documents and withholding information that would clear her client and has asked the Court to hold the Fed in contempt.
By cancelling this hearing the Judge has said that he doesn't need to hear anymore evidence on this Motion and that the unrebutted charges made by Flynn's counsel, and the evidence they provided in support of these charges is enough for him to rule on this matter.
Not a good sign for the Prosecution.
Looking forward to El Monte being covered in shit on this matter. -
I am certain you believe this.SFGbob said:The Judge in the Flynn case just cancelled the upcoming hearing that was scheduled to hear the Motion to Compel the production of exculpatory materials by the prosecution.
The Judge essentially said that the briefing filed by both parties was enough and that he didn't need to have a hearing to rule on the matter. Flynn's counsel accused the Feds of falsifying documents and withholding information that would clear her client and has asked the Court to hold the Fed in contempt.
By cancelling this hearing the Judge has said that he doesn't need to hear anymore evidence on this Motion and that the unrebutted charges made by Flynn's counsel, and the evidence they provided in support of these charges is enough for him to rule on this matter.
Not a good sign for the Prosecution.
Looking forward to El Monte being covered in shit on this matter. -
And I knew a lightweight Kunt like you would have nothing in response.CirrhosisDawg said:
I am certain you believe this.SFGbob said:The Judge in the Flynn case just cancelled the upcoming hearing that was scheduled to hear the Motion to Compel the production of exculpatory materials by the prosecution.
The Judge essentially said that the briefing filed by both parties was enough and that he didn't need to have a hearing to rule on the matter. Flynn's counsel accused the Feds of falsifying documents and withholding information that would clear her client and has asked the Court to hold the Fed in contempt.
By cancelling this hearing the Judge has said that he doesn't need to hear anymore evidence on this Motion and that the unrebutted charges made by Flynn's counsel, and the evidence they provided in support of these charges is enough for him to rule on this matter.
Not a good sign for the Prosecution.
Looking forward to El Monte being covered in shit on this matter.
-
Laura Ingraham is a little hurt that you don’t watch. Our country’s expert on Ukraine speaks Ukrainian. Very suspicious!SFGbob said:And yet you're the only person here mentioning this "argument."
-
Westlinn.SFGbob said: -
Mouthy dumbfuck bump
-
Its a guilty pleasure reviewing an old thread that without a doubt reveals just how bad these rats are at believing their lying media. Supposedly educated individuals who look like fools. One thing we now know they are for certain are goose stepping morons who would rather see innocent Americans go to jail rather than seek the truth. They are pathetic and weak minded and their candidates should never be allowed to be in charge again..
-
When I say scratch a leftist find a fascist it's not like there isn't plenty of evidence. The counselor sure loves himself some leftard talking points. Actual facts and evidence not needed. Hope Flynn sues for millions. He deserves them. Hope the bad guys go to jail.
