Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
The President is above the law
insinceredawg
Member Posts: 5,117
in Tug Tavern
Comments
-
Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
Trump’s attorney argued this yesterday.PurpleThrobber said:Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
But does he have a phone and a pen and free guns for ISIS and Mexican drug cartels?
-
Slow legal system.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s attorney argued this yesterday.PurpleThrobber said:Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
He isn't the first person to argue it. President needs to be impeached first before he can be prosecuted for violating the law. There are sound legal arguments in support of this. Of course you have O'Keefed the shittiest attorney this side of the Pecos and yourself, the dumbest mother fucker this side of Hondo confused by the argument.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s attorney argued this yesterday.PurpleThrobber said:Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
Where does that living, breathing Constitution of ours say the POTUS cannot be prosecuted for crimes while in office?SFGbob said:
He isn't the first person to argue it. President needs to be impeached first before he can be prosecuted for violating the law. There are sound legal arguments in support of this. Of course you have O'Keefed the shittiest attorney this side of the Pecos and yourself, the dumbest mother fucker this side of Hondo confused by the argument.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s attorney argued this yesterday.PurpleThrobber said:Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
I never said the Constitution said it my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I said there are sound legal arguments supporting that position. Of course you and sound legal arguments are unfamiliar with each other.HHusky said:
Where does that living, breathing Constitution of ours say the POTUS cannot be prosecuted for crimes while in office?SFGbob said:
He isn't the first person to argue it. President needs to be impeached first before he can be prosecuted for violating the law. There are sound legal arguments in support of this. Of course you have O'Keefed the shittiest attorney this side of the Pecos and yourself, the dumbest mother fucker this side of Hondo confused by the argument.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s attorney argued this yesterday.PurpleThrobber said:Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
“Sound legal arguments” smack! What “law” do these fabulous arguments derive from then?SFGbob said:
I never said the Constitution said it my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend. I said there are sound legal arguments supporting that position. Of course you and sound legal arguments are unfamiliar with each other.HHusky said:
Where does that living, breathing Constitution of ours say the POTUS cannot be prosecuted for crimes while in office?SFGbob said:
He isn't the first person to argue it. President needs to be impeached first before he can be prosecuted for violating the law. There are sound legal arguments in support of this. Of course you have O'Keefed the shittiest attorney this side of the Pecos and yourself, the dumbest mother fucker this side of Hondo confused by the argument.CirrhosisDawg said:
Trump’s attorney argued this yesterday.PurpleThrobber said:Thanks for the 2016 hot take.
-
This should make a great article of impeachment
-
In 1973, in the midst of the Watergate scandal engulfing President Richard Nixon, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel adopted in an internal memo the position that a sitting president cannot be indicted. Nixon resigned in 1974, with the House of Representatives moving toward impeaching him.
“The spectacle of an indicted president still trying to serve as Chief Executive boggles the imagination,” the memo stated.
The department reaffirmed the policy in a 2000 memo, saying court decisions in the intervening years had not changed its conclusion that a sitting president is “constitutionally immune” from indictment and criminal prosecution. It concluded that criminal charges against a president would “violate the constitutional separation of powers” delineating the authority of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the U.S. government.
“The indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions,” the memo stated.
Hardly shocking the O'Keefed the worst fucking attorney around is ignorant of this. Can you imagine the poor saps who are actually dumb enough to hire this dumbfuck? O'Keefed must have his malpractice defense guys on speed dial.
