Who runs Mexico?
The drug cartels do. And they proved it.
Who really runs the U.S.? We'll find out. The clock is ticking.
By the way Mexico has very strict gun control.
Comments
-
Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here. -
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here. -
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here. -
The corporations and special interest groups run America. Why even ask the question?
The Throbber could clean this shit up in a moment. Meaningful campaign finance reform - you don't vote, you don't get to contribute to ANY campaign. No union contributions, no PAC, none of that bullshit. Individuals can contribute to a designated threshold that goes up or down by the CPI. Period. That's it.
That's Phase 1.
-
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here. -
I’m wondering how you thought that was relevant to the Mexican cartel shooting story?Sledog said:
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here. -
Someone other than the people controls their government. A corrupt government. We aren't that different given the current circumstances.ThomasFremont said:
I’m wondering how you thought that was relevant to the Mexican cartel shooting story?Sledog said:
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here. -
Talk about a scathing review of the Trump presidency.Sledog said:
Someone other than the people controls their government. A corrupt government. We aren't that different given the current circumstances.ThomasFremont said:
I’m wondering how you thought that was relevant to the Mexican cartel shooting story?Sledog said:
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here.
Welcome to the Resistance!!! -
-
In what way is Trump corrupt? Being President has cost him money. Not sucking up to the Russians and chicoms like barry and the Clinton's and Bidens seems like anti-corruption.
-
I'm talking about you commies.ThomasFremont said:
Talk about a scathing review of the Trump presidency.Sledog said:
Someone other than the people controls their government. A corrupt government. We aren't that different given the current circumstances.ThomasFremont said:
I’m wondering how you thought that was relevant to the Mexican cartel shooting story?Sledog said:
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here.
Welcome to the Resistance!!! -
The Resistance is Toxically Gay.ThomasFremont said:
Talk about a scathing review of the Trump presidency.Sledog said:
Someone other than the people controls their government. A corrupt government. We aren't that different given the current circumstances.ThomasFremont said:
I’m wondering how you thought that was relevant to the Mexican cartel shooting story?Sledog said:
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here.
Welcome to the Resistance!!!
So you're right at home, Tommy. -
WhoooooshTurdBomber said:
The Resistance is Toxically Gay.ThomasFremont said:
Talk about a scathing review of the Trump presidency.Sledog said:
Someone other than the people controls their government. A corrupt government. We aren't that different given the current circumstances.ThomasFremont said:
I’m wondering how you thought that was relevant to the Mexican cartel shooting story?Sledog said:
The people or the deep state career politicians.ThomasFremont said:
Ok, didn’t think so, but then what is the connection you are drawing here?Sledog said:
No I'm not insinuating they run America.ThomasFremont said:Are you insinuating that Mexican drug cartels run America?
Genuinely curious to know what dots you are connecting here.
Welcome to the Resistance!!!
So you're right at home, Tommy. -
Why should people acting in a collective not have the same rights as when acting as individuals?PurpleThrobber said:The corporations and special interest groups run America. Why even ask the question?
The Throbber could clean this shit up in a moment. Meaningful campaign finance reform - you don't vote, you don't get to contribute to ANY campaign. No union contributions, no PAC, none of that bullshit. Individuals can contribute to a designated threshold that goes up or down by the CPI. Period. That's it.
That's Phase 1. -
You are a fan of corruption, eh? kudosMikeDamone said:
Why should people acting in a collective not have the same rights as when acting as individuals?PurpleThrobber said:The corporations and special interest groups run America. Why even ask the question?
The Throbber could clean this shit up in a moment. Meaningful campaign finance reform - you don't vote, you don't get to contribute to ANY campaign. No union contributions, no PAC, none of that bullshit. Individuals can contribute to a designated threshold that goes up or down by the CPI. Period. That's it.
That's Phase 1.
I’d eliminate ALL political contributions if necessary to get rid of the corruption and special interests. -
Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
-
Correct. And answer the question. Why would you suggest people lose rights they have as individuals when then act corporately? They are still individuals, are they not?ThomasFremont said:Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
-
I’m not a fan of corruption. You’re better than at PT, you don’t need to drop a logical fallacy. That’s for the HondoBros.PurpleThrobber said:
You are a fan of corruption, eh? kudosMikeDamone said:
Why should people acting in a collective not have the same rights as when acting as individuals?PurpleThrobber said:The corporations and special interest groups run America. Why even ask the question?
The Throbber could clean this shit up in a moment. Meaningful campaign finance reform - you don't vote, you don't get to contribute to ANY campaign. No union contributions, no PAC, none of that bullshit. Individuals can contribute to a designated threshold that goes up or down by the CPI. Period. That's it.
That's Phase 1.
I’d eliminate ALL political contributions if necessary to get rid of the corruption and special interests.
Getting rid of contributions is a 1A issue. Corruption is a separate issue. -
PurpleThrobber said:
You are a fan of corruption, eh? kudosMikeDamone said:
Why should people acting in a collective not have the same rights as when acting as individuals?PurpleThrobber said:The corporations and special interest groups run America. Why even ask the question?
The Throbber could clean this shit up in a moment. Meaningful campaign finance reform - you don't vote, you don't get to contribute to ANY campaign. No union contributions, no PAC, none of that bullshit. Individuals can contribute to a designated threshold that goes up or down by the CPI. Period. That's it.
That's Phase 1.
I’d eliminate ALL political contributions if necessary to get rid of the corruption and special interests.
This is really the same logic that would get rid off all guns to get rid of gun deaths. Take away law abiding citizens rights, because others are abusing the right. -
Term limits solves the big problem.
-
Que les pasa a los Ciudadanos Unidos?ThomasFremont said:Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
-
*Messico. Fixed.Sledog said:https://time.com/5705358/sinaloa-cartel-mexico-culiacan/
The drug cartels do. And they proved it.
Who really runs the U.S.? We'll find out. The clock is ticking.
By the way Mexico has very strict gun control. -
Imagine believing that making a movie critical of PIPS should be banned and the movie makers thrown in jail. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
They lose nothing, all of their individual rights are fully intact.MikeDamone said:
Correct. And answer the question. Why would you suggest people lose rights they have as individuals when then act corporately? They are still individuals, are they not?ThomasFremont said:Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
Why would you suggest corporations should have rights above and beyond those of the individual? -
I’m not suggesting that. I’m suggesting that individuals have the same rights when they act corporately. Like I said in my post.ThomasFremont said:
They lose nothing, all of their individual rights are fully intact.MikeDamone said:
Correct. And answer the question. Why would you suggest people lose rights they have as individuals when then act corporately? They are still individuals, are they not?ThomasFremont said:Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
Why would you suggest corporations should have rights above and beyond those of the individual? -
You’re suggesting something that isn’t the case actually is, and rejecting something that is the case doesn’t exist.MikeDamone said:
I’m not suggesting that. I’m suggesting that individuals have the same rights when they act corporately. Like I said in my post.ThomasFremont said:
They lose nothing, all of their individual rights are fully intact.MikeDamone said:
Correct. And answer the question. Why would you suggest people lose rights they have as individuals when then act corporately? They are still individuals, are they not?ThomasFremont said:Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
Why would you suggest corporations should have rights above and beyond those of the individual?
-
You mean like Google and FB's rights to rig the 2020 election? I agree. Why do Lefties support that?ThomasFremont said:
They lose nothing, all of their individual rights are fully intact.MikeDamone said:
Correct. And answer the question. Why would you suggest people lose rights they have as individuals when then act corporately? They are still individuals, are they not?ThomasFremont said:Damone is a big fan of Citizens United.
Why would you suggest corporations should have rights above and beyond those of the individual? -
So the NY Times, a corporation should have no 1A rights? News to them. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
Correct. The NY times does not have 1A rights. The journalists that work there do however.WestlinnDuck said:So the NY Times, a corporation should have no 1A rights? News to them. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
-
Wrong. Stick to the fryer, the grill, and the fridge, lest you hurt yourself.2001400ex said:
Correct. The NY times does not have 1A rights. The journalists that work there do however.WestlinnDuck said:So the NY Times, a corporation should have no 1A rights? News to them. Scratch a leftist find a fascist.
