Eason staying for 2020 season
Fucking god damnit
Comments
-
Petersen never plays the backup....ever.
Just one of his major downfalls -
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.
-
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.
-
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.
-
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.
-
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.
-
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.
-
Any thoughts on when we play the backup?
-
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.RaceBannon said:Any thoughts on when we play the backup?
-
HuskyJW said:
Petersen never plays the backup....ever.
Just one of his major downfalls
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense. -
Thanks!GrundleStiltzkin said:
We will play the back up QB once the starter can execute the offense.RaceBannon said:Any thoughts on when we play the backup?
-
I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform. -
-
But Haeny did good vs North Alberta
-
I think there is a space with a comfortable lead and garbage time where the parking defense is still playing and you can get good reps in.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform. -
I know one of you fuckers tagged mom 20 years ago... which one of you bastards are the fatherDoog_de_Jour said: -
Too late to edit.Mad_Son said:
I think there is a space with between a comfortable lead and garbage time where the parking defense is still playing and you can get good reps in.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform. -
I know you're being sarcastic but that was South Alberta.PostGameOrangeSlices said:But Haeny did good vs North Alberta
-
I care. Petersen is an incredibly slow learner in this area. The whole tone of this board in the last two months is that game reps are more important than practice reps. Your backup QB should always be getting a couple of series in the first half of games to see what game speed is like. This prevents your backup from going in cold like Haener did against Cal and shit happening. It requires a little bit of finesse as to when to get the backup some reps but you would expect a top level coach to be able to manage that. Pete is a very, very average gameday coach.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Edit: If we are all gonna scream to play the young receivers, shouldn't the young QB get some reps too? -
Not many teams give the back up reps in the first half anymore. What coaches and programs do a great job of getting the back up quality reps?whuggy said:
I care. Petersen is an incredibly slow learner in this area. The whole tone of this board in the last two months is that game reps are more important than practice reps. Your backup QB should always be getting a couple of series in the first half of games to see what game speed is like. This prevents your backup from going in cold like Haener did against Cal and shit happening. It requires a little bit of finesse as to when to get the backup some reps but you would expect a top level coach to be able to manage that. Pete is a very, very average gameday coach.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Edit: If we are all gonna scream to play the young receivers, shouldn't the young QB get some reps too? -
Don't care. Our priorities should be in order of importance:RoadDawg55 said:
Not many teams give the back up reps in the first half anymore. What coaches and programs do a great job of getting the back up quality reps?whuggy said:
I care. Petersen is an incredibly slow learner in this area. The whole tone of this board in the last two months is that game reps are more important than practice reps. Your backup QB should always be getting a couple of series in the first half of games to see what game speed is like. This prevents your backup from going in cold like Haener did against Cal and shit happening. It requires a little bit of finesse as to when to get the backup some reps but you would expect a top level coach to be able to manage that. Pete is a very, very average gameday coach.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Edit: If we are all gonna scream to play the young receivers, shouldn't the young QB get some reps too?
1) Make playoffs
2) Win conference, make Rose Bowl
3) Fuck it, start preparing for next year
If 1 and 2 are gone then it doesn't matter so get young players quality reps. ALL POSITIONS. -
The fuck? Literally no one does this.whuggy said:
I care. Petersen is an incredibly slow learner in this area. The whole tone of this board in the last two months is that game reps are more important than practice reps. Your backup QB should always be getting a couple of series in the first half of games to see what game speed is like. This prevents your backup from going in cold like Haener did against Cal and shit happening. It requires a little bit of finesse as to when to get the backup some reps but you would expect a top level coach to be able to manage that. Pete is a very, very average gameday coach.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Edit: If we are all gonna scream to play the young receivers, shouldn't the young QB get some reps too?
There's plenty to complain about with Pete.
This ain't it. -
Yeah, I'm not sure about first half unless we're well-ahead in the first half. I'm thinking more later 3rd quarter/ early 4th quarter are when we will more likely find these opportunities.dnc said:
The fuck? Literally no one does this.whuggy said:
I care. Petersen is an incredibly slow learner in this area. The whole tone of this board in the last two months is that game reps are more important than practice reps. Your backup QB should always be getting a couple of series in the first half of games to see what game speed is like. This prevents your backup from going in cold like Haener did against Cal and shit happening. It requires a little bit of finesse as to when to get the backup some reps but you would expect a top level coach to be able to manage that. Pete is a very, very average gameday coach.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Edit: If we are all gonna scream to play the young receivers, shouldn't the young QB get some reps too?
There's plenty to complain about with Pete.
This ain't it. -
Don James isn't walking through that door to give the back up a series in the first half
-
The bitching about Eason not getting enough game repps would be deafening.
-
This. Everyone (including myself) on this bored wanted to murder Pete when he said “Jake Haener will play. He’s earned it” right after naming Eason the starter. Fuck playing the backup when the starting offense still can’t figure it outGrundleStiltzkin said:The bitching about Eason not getting enough game repps would be deafening.
-
How much more broken and confused would the offense be if Haener had stayed and Pete kept rotating him in with Eason?
-
It wouldn't have happened.ThomasFremont said:How much more broken and confused would the offense be if Haener had stayed and Pete kept rotating him in with Eason?
-
They do if your coach let's you RIP IT and run all the plays. They don't if he only let's you hand off even when it's 3rd and 25.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Something is better than nothing, and even garbage time game play is faster than anything the kid's gonna get in practice. We talkin' 'bout PRACTICE. -
To an extent they are fine. Arizona gave up and probably had back ups in too. Maybe it would be good from a confidence stand point.creepycoug said:
They do if your coach let's you RIP IT and run all the plays. They don't if he only let's you hand off even when it's 3rd and 25.RoadDawg55 said:I don’t find myself caring about this. The late game reps on a blow out don’t really do anything. I would take Eason out because I don’t want him hurt then care about the back up getting reps.
It’s a lot different when you’re thrown in against Oregon or another quality opponent. It’s sink or swim and the garbage time reps aren’t making Sirmon any more or less ready to perform.
Something is better than nothing, and even garbage time game play is faster than anything the kid's gonna get in practice. We talkin' 'bout PRACTICE.
I really don’t think those reps would help much if Eason went down in the first quarter and Sirmon came in. Like I said before, it’s sink or swim.
