Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon Week!

12346

Comments

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,040

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    Again, I cry:


  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,196
    edited October 2019

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
    As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

    Way to contribute

    There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
    "Wasteland". FOH.















    That is Central Oregon. Christ.

    This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:



    Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.
    I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.

    From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.

    I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worth seeing - dont twist
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,255 Founders Club
    edited October 2019

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
  • CallMeBigErn
    CallMeBigErn Member Posts: 8,028

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
    As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

    Way to contribute

    There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
    "Wasteland". FOH.















    That is Central Oregon. Christ.

    This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:



    Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.
    I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.

    From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.

    I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worse seeing - dont twist
    Less people the better. Check out Steens someday and thank me later.

    I don't disagree that WA is better overall. It is. I'm saying you're wrong that Eastern O is a wasteland. There are numerous big fucking mountains and Alp-like ranges in Eastern O that come as a shock to people that think it's just desert wasteland. It's an outdoorsman paradise. I've been all over it. DYOR.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,196

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,559

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
    As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

    Way to contribute

    There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
    "Wasteland". FOH.















    That is Central Oregon. Christ.

    This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:



    Well, hunting kicks ass in Eastern Oregon, so fuck off!
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,196
    edited October 2019

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
    As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

    Way to contribute

    There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
    "Wasteland". FOH.















    That is Central Oregon. Christ.

    This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:



    Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.
    I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.

    From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.

    I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worse seeing - dont twist
    Less people the better. Check out Steens someday and thank me later.

    I don't disagree that WA is better overall. It is. I'm saying you're wrong that Eastern O is a wasteland. There are numerous big fucking mountains and Alp-like ranges in Eastern O that come as a shock to people that think it's just desert wasteland. It's an outdoorsman paradise. I've been all over it. DYOR.
    Alp like ranges? Dude just stop. Nothing in the US even comes close to the Alps - if anything does it's the Pickett Range in the N Cascades.



    I will check out those places you listed. Steens looks cool but it looks like it is surrounded by 200 miles of dirt
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,040

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
    As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."

    Way to contribute

    There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
    "Wasteland". FOH.















    That is Central Oregon. Christ.

    This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:



    Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.
    I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.

    From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.

    I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worth seeing - dont twist
    My Dood. This is absurd.

    I've been in the middle of the middle of the middle of fucking nowhere in eastern Washington, eastern Montana, eastern Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming ... all of it. That there is greater land mass of such places in Oregon speaks to the fact that the boundaries were drawn much larger than those of Washington. It really doesn't matter.

    The point is there are a shit ton of absolutely spectacular God's country places in both states, which comprise the PNW. If you want to throw down Crater Lake vs. Hoh Rain Forest, then do it, but it's really not important. Why not both?
  • CallMeBigErn
    CallMeBigErn Member Posts: 8,028

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,196
    edited October 2019

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.
    16 vs 12. Interesting

    WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and are serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb
  • CallMeBigErn
    CallMeBigErn Member Posts: 8,028
    edited October 2019

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.
    16 vs 12. Interesting

    WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and our serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb
    We'd probably get along IRL. Just trying to inform here.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,196

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.
    16 vs 12. Interesting

    WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and our serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb
    We'd probably get along IRL. Just trying to inform here.
    For sure. Another factor against Oregon for me is the distance it takes to get there. Want to loan me your RV? Only moderate wear and tear from coke and strippers
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,129

    CaptainPJ said:

    You all laugh, but this was a real live debate over at Doogman years back. It morphed into a state level debate where people were comparing / competing over which state had the better geographical topography and greater natural beauty. CastlerockRon/royotis was throwing down for Washington, arguing that Oregon just didn't have an answer for Mt. Rayonier. There were protracted arguments between morons over whether Olympic National Park was better than Crescent Lake, etc. etc.

    This literally went on for months and people were taking it seriously.

    So who won?!!
    Washington, of course.

    Lake Chelan was the tie breaker. The Oregonians had no answer.
    I have to go with Oregon from a geological / topography perspective. I prefer Bachelor to any of the WA ski resorts although Seattle is way closer to Whistler. Oregon's wine country is way better than Washington's. Oregon coast is better too. The Bend / Sunriver area is fantastic.
    Crystal and Baker are both ten times better than Bachelor what the actual fuck
    Bachelor has way better vertical than either Crystal or Baker. They get plenty of snow. Far shorter lift lines than Crystal on the weekends.
    Crystal is awful on the weekends. Most the day is spent in line and on the chairs.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,255 Founders Club

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.

    All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.

    Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,040

    North Cascades mysteriously absent

    This thread is a fucking embarrassment.

    @YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing

    WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.

    Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.

    WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.

    This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
    @PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.
    My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.

    Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
    Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.

    All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.

    Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain.
    One thing Crystal has that none of the others have, including Whistler, is a can't-get-closer view of a giant mother fucking volcano.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,196
    Swaye said:

    Swaye said:

    Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA

    Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awful
    You don't know what you're missing.


    Ive been to Virginia 4 times. I know exactly what Im missing and how bad the east coast sucks lol
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    Swaye said:

    Swaye said:

    Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA

    Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awful
    You don't know what you're missing.


    Ive been to Virginia 4 times. I know exactly what Im missing and how bad the east coast sucks lol
    I'll take purple Virginia over deep blue Washington any day. Only thing I miss from Washington is Dicks. Take that however.
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    This thread is gay
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,057



    mic drop...

    There are literally dozens of those in Pullman, WA. And most have deep psychological daddy issues which can only be cured anally.

  • UWhuskytskeet
    UWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113



    mic drop...

    Hot but that's from like 2005.