Oregon Week!
Comments
-
Again, I cry:PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
-
I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.CallMeBigErn said:
Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That is Central Oregon. Christ.CallMeBigErn said:
"Wasteland". FOH.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Way to contributeCallMeBigErn said:
As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:
From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.
I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worth seeing - dont twist -
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend. -
Less people the better. Check out Steens someday and thank me later.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.CallMeBigErn said:
Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That is Central Oregon. Christ.CallMeBigErn said:
"Wasteland". FOH.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Way to contributeCallMeBigErn said:
As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:
From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.
I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worse seeing - dont twist
I don't disagree that WA is better overall. It is. I'm saying you're wrong that Eastern O is a wasteland. There are numerous big fucking mountains and Alp-like ranges in Eastern O that come as a shock to people that think it's just desert wasteland. It's an outdoorsman paradise. I've been all over it. DYOR. -
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40. -
Well, hunting kicks ass in Eastern Oregon, so fuck off!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That is Central Oregon. Christ.CallMeBigErn said:
"Wasteland". FOH.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Way to contributeCallMeBigErn said:
As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
This is 99% of Eastern Oregon: -
Alp like ranges? Dude just stop. Nothing in the US even comes close to the Alps - if anything does it's the Pickett Range in the N Cascades.CallMeBigErn said:
Less people the better. Check out Steens someday and thank me later.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.CallMeBigErn said:
Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That is Central Oregon. Christ.CallMeBigErn said:
"Wasteland". FOH.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Way to contributeCallMeBigErn said:
As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:
From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.
I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worse seeing - dont twist
I don't disagree that WA is better overall. It is. I'm saying you're wrong that Eastern O is a wasteland. There are numerous big fucking mountains and Alp-like ranges in Eastern O that come as a shock to people that think it's just desert wasteland. It's an outdoorsman paradise. I've been all over it. DYOR.
I will check out those places you listed. Steens looks cool but it looks like it is surrounded by 200 miles of dirt -
My Dood. This is absurd.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
I'm not behind is where youre wrong. North Eastern Oregon where it touches the Snake River, Idaho and WA seems to have some cool stuff. Never been.CallMeBigErn said:
Steens Mountain, the Elkhorns, the Wallowas, and the Snake River are absolutely Eastern Oregon. Just quit while you're behind.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That is Central Oregon. Christ.CallMeBigErn said:
"Wasteland". FOH.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Way to contributeCallMeBigErn said:
As my late mother once told me, "Tis better to keep your fucking mouth shut and have people think you're an idiot than to open your mouth and remove all doubt."PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
There is fucking nothing in Eastern Oregon. Nothing. It is a wasteland on par with Northern Nevada.
This is 99% of Eastern Oregon:
From Bend to Burns to Boise is 500 miles of dust.. from Burns to California is dust. Look at it on google earth there is like 10 people in that entire stretch of land.
I stand by my comment that WA is superior head to head. That doesnt mean Oregon sucks or has nothing worth seeing - dont twist
I've been in the middle of the middle of the middle of fucking nowhere in eastern Washington, eastern Montana, eastern Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming ... all of it. That there is greater land mass of such places in Oregon speaks to the fact that the boundaries were drawn much larger than those of Washington. It really doesn't matter.
The point is there are a shit ton of absolutely spectacular God's country places in both states, which comprise the PNW. If you want to throw down Crater Lake vs. Hoh Rain Forest, then do it, but it's really not important. Why not both? -
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40. -
16 vs 12. InterestingCallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and are serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb -
We'd probably get along IRL. Just trying to inform here.PostGameOrangeSlices said:CallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.CallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
16 vs 12. InterestingCallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and our serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb -
For sure. Another factor against Oregon for me is the distance it takes to get there. Want to loan me your RV? Only moderate wear and tear from coke and strippersCallMeBigErn said:
We'd probably get along IRL. Just trying to inform here.PostGameOrangeSlices said:CallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.CallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
16 vs 12. InterestingCallMeBigErn said:
Sure, but Oregon has more peaks above 9k.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
WA has a shit load of 8k ones that barely miss the cut and our serious mountains, like Dragontail. Fun climb -
mic drop...
-
As our football team has improved so have the cheerleaders. We have some legit dime pieces on the squad now.greenblood said:
mic drop...
But YRYK -
Crystal is awful on the weekends. Most the day is spent in line and on the chairs.YellowSnow said:
Bachelor has way better vertical than either Crystal or Baker. They get plenty of snow. Far shorter lift lines than Crystal on the weekends.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Crystal and Baker are both ten times better than Bachelor what the actual fuckYellowSnow said:
I have to go with Oregon from a geological / topography perspective. I prefer Bachelor to any of the WA ski resorts although Seattle is way closer to Whistler. Oregon's wine country is way better than Washington's. Oregon coast is better too. The Bend / Sunriver area is fantastic.creepycoug said:
Washington, of course.CaptainPJ said:
So who won?!!creepycoug said:You all laugh, but this was a real live debate over at Doogman years back. It morphed into a state level debate where people were comparing / competing over which state had the better geographical topography and greater natural beauty. CastlerockRon/royotis was throwing down for Washington, arguing that Oregon just didn't have an answer for Mt. Rayonier. There were protracted arguments between morons over whether Olympic National Park was better than Crescent Lake, etc. etc.
This literally went on for months and people were taking it seriously.
Lake Chelan was the tie breaker. The Oregonians had no answer. -
Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.
Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain. -
One thing Crystal has that none of the others have, including Whistler, is a can't-get-closer view of a giant mother fucking volcano.YellowSnow said:
Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.
Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain. -
Tahoma TUFF.creepycoug said:
One thing Crystal has that none of the others have, including Whistler, is a can't-get-closer view of a giant mother fucking volcano.YellowSnow said:
Sorry bruh - I take it personally when someone takes a jab at my mountain man street cred.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
My aspen comment was a low tweak and not to be taken seriously.YellowSnow said:
@PostGameOrangeSlices there were only 3 ski resorts (2 hosted the winter olympics) within 5 mins of my high school and 9 total within 60 mins but I’m probably a poser hipster who doesn’t anything about the great outdoors.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This thread is a fucking embarrassment.minion_doog said:North Cascades mysteriously absent
@YellowSnow claiming Oregon has superior geography is embarassing
WA State only has 4 fucking mountain ranges (Cascades, Olympics, Selkirks, Blues), the most rugged range in the lower 48 (N. Cascades), 5 fucking real and tuff Volcanoes (Glacier Peak counts), a dense mossy rainforest, a fjord with tons of islands in it, the god damn Enchantments.
Eastern Oregon is a wasteland east of Smith Rock. WA state actually has bodies of water and a river going through it. There is jack shit for hundreds of miles except scrub pine in Eastern Oregon.
WA state wilderness is the big leagues, Oregon is the minors. The only thing I would say Oregon has over WA is better coastline, but WA has some great spots too.
This thread really outs those who actually do outdoorsy shit from those who ski in Aspen and pretend.
Washington has over 110 peaks taller than 7,000 feet. Oregon has less than 40.
All kidding aside, of course Washington’s mountains and glacier carved lowlands are more impressive than Oregon. But my remark about geography was more a preference for the Oregon coast and the Bend / Sunriver area over anything comparable in WA.
Baker and Crystal both do some things better than Bachelor but overall the latter is the better mountain.
-
Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA
-
The one on the left has a real surprise buttseks quality to her.greenblood said:
mic drop... -
Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awfulSwaye said:Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA
-
You don't know what you're missing.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awfulSwaye said:Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA
-
Ive been to Virginia 4 times. I know exactly what Im missing and how bad the east coast sucks lolSwaye said:
You don't know what you're missing.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awfulSwaye said:Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA
-
I'll take purple Virginia over deep blue Washington any day. Only thing I miss from Washington is Dicks. Take that however.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Ive been to Virginia 4 times. I know exactly what Im missing and how bad the east coast sucks lolSwaye said:
You don't know what you're missing.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Im sorry you live in fucking Virginia. That must be awfulSwaye said:Would you faggots take your stupid Oregon vs. Washington scenic beauty gaywad thread somewhere else so we can get back to talking about buttfucking Cristoballz in mine? TIA
-
I just realized you are trying to get me to fuck up my own thread with a new WA vs. VA debate.
-
This thread is gay
-
-
There are literally dozens of those in Pullman, WA. And most have deep psychological daddy issues which can only be cured anally.greenblood said:
mic drop...
-
Hot but that's from like 2005.greenblood said:
mic drop... -
That means most of these chicks are mid 30's and fat with two kids. Thanks for ruining that illusion.UWhuskytskeet said:
Hot but that's from like 2005.greenblood said:
mic drop...