Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Nothing to see

Sledog
Sledog Member Posts: 37,623 Standard Supporter
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/30/two-gop-senators-say-ukraine-worked-with-dnc-to-un/

How is it the seen to have done everything they accuse trump of? No imagination?

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,852
    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,623 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,852
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 6,993
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Your unsubstantiated TDS accusations aren't what Sled was asking for Perry.

    Give the proof. Just one actual example would work.

    Jeez you have fallen hard with TDS.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,852

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


    Each of these very well documented. Crimes are crimes, whether they have been prosecuted or not.

    OJ is a murderer too.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    edited October 2019

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    O'keefed doesn't give a fuck about evidence, truth or facts. I've seen him twice jump out in front of a racial lynch mob for no other reason than he believed it was good politics to do so. The guilt and or the innocence of the accused made no fucking difference to him, and if he had to lie, or rely on the word of other liars to make his case, he didn't give a fuck.

    You're dealing with the absolute bottom of the barrel scumbag here.
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    This is totally irrelevant to the current impeachment inquiry or upcoming vote, but ok. Knock yourself out.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,623 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2019
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Lol his traxes have been gone over many times. That's the first thing Mueller did. Like all shitty federal prosecutors that's the first thing they do. He also had just undergone an audit. No proof of any of the other allegations but keep talking Shiff.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


    Each of these very well documented. Crimes are crimes, whether they have been prosecuted or not.

    OJ is a murderer too.
    Please. You intentionally used the phrase 'guilty'.

  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    This is totally irrelevant to the current impeachment inquiry or upcoming vote, but ok. Knock yourself out.
    No, it's not. In this country, despite what you and the twitterseverse may believe, it's still a nation of laws with a presumption of innocence.

    Is Trump guilty? Hell, if I know but until he is charged and given a trial with a proper defense, he's not.

    Why is this so hard for the radical leftists to understand?

    Basic civics.


  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    This is totally irrelevant to the current impeachment inquiry or upcoming vote, but ok. Knock yourself out.
    No, it's not. In this country, despite what you and the twitterseverse may believe, it's still a nation of laws with a presumption of innocence.

    Is Trump guilty? Hell, if I know but until he is charged and given a trial with a proper defense, he's not.

    Why is this so hard for the radical leftists to understand?

    Basic civics.


    Expand on that. Show me where article 2 section 4 says that. Should be easy. Basic civics.
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,852

    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


    Each of these very well documented. Crimes are crimes, whether they have been prosecuted or not.

    OJ is a murderer too.
    Please. You intentionally used the phrase 'guilty'.

    Guilty is a familiar English word. Thus Mall Cop's question, which also used it.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,003
    edited October 2019

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    This is totally irrelevant to the current impeachment inquiry or upcoming vote, but ok. Knock yourself out.
    No, it's not. In this country, despite what you and the twitterseverse may believe, it's still a nation of laws with a presumption of innocence.

    Is Trump guilty? Hell, if I know but until he is charged and given a trial with a proper defense, he's not.

    Why is this so hard for the radical leftists to understand?

    Basic civics.


    Expand on that. Show me where article 2 section 4 says that. Should be easy. Basic civics.
    Nah- you've pretty well shown you're incapable of critical thought or deviating from the central party line. It's fairly clear you don't believe in the rule of law or, as the original brown skins said "ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat"





  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 6,993
    HHusky said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


    Each of these very well documented. Crimes are crimes, whether they have been prosecuted or not.

    OJ is a murderer too.
    By all means HH, show us where the documentation is?

    Ha ha......we won't get any documentation or facts from HH.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,623 Standard Supporter
    HH ain't got shit! Don't know shit! Ain't shit!