Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Nothing to see

Sledog
Sledog Member Posts: 38,684 Standard Supporter
in Tug Tavern
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/30/two-gop-senators-say-ukraine-worked-with-dnc-to-un/

How is it the seen to have done everything they accuse trump of? No imagination?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,433
    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,684 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,433
    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,208 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Your unsubstantiated TDS accusations aren't what Sled was asking for Perry.

    Give the proof. Just one actual example would work.

    Jeez you have fallen hard with TDS.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,688 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,688 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,433
    PurpleThrobber said:

    HHusky said:

    Sledog said:

    HHusky said:

    Daddy's guilty as sin. If you can catch someone else too, go for it.

    Guilty of what? Name the crimes. I'll wait here. You're an attorney should be easy.
    Guilty of violating his oath of office.

    Guilty of witness intimidation.

    Guilty of obstruction of justice.

    Guilty of campaign finance violations.

    Guilty of tax evasion.

    At least.
    Funny. Don't recall any charges or trial on any of those. You sure you're a lawyer? Guilty means, well, GUILTY. Convicted.

    Allegations, innuendo, rumored....way better words. But GUILTY isn't the right phrase at all.


    Each of these very well documented. Crimes are crimes, whether they have been prosecuted or not.

    OJ is a murderer too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited October 2019
    PurpleThrobber said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    O'keefed doesn't give a fuck about evidence, truth or facts. I've seen him twice jump out in front of a racial lynch mob for no other reason than he believed it was good politics to do so. The guilt and or the innocence of the accused made no fucking difference to him, and if he had to lie, or rely on the word of other liars to make his case, he didn't give a fuck.

    You're dealing with the absolute bottom of the barrel scumbag here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    PurpleThrobber said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    The impeachment inquiry is underway and the vote will likely take place later this year.

    Article 2 Section 4 of the Constitution. Basic civics.

    Still hasn't been found guilty like your boy H contends.

    The Star Chamber was abolished in the 1600's.

    Basic history.

    This is totally irrelevant to the current impeachment inquiry or upcoming vote, but ok. Knock yourself out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter