Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Report: Hawks now Favorite for Bennett
Comments
-
No idea why people dont want to keep Tate. He is great for the team, too many people loom at the raw WR numbers.
I agree if some team is going to pay him a shitload of money let him walk... but if you can keep him at a decent price they should. -
at 8/8.5 I'm perfectly fine with this. Fine price. Clemons is going to be gone with a few hours
We also need to bring back McDonald and Tate. -
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2014/03/10/bennett-turned-down-more-money-from-two-other-teams/
Bennett took less? If florio is correct (which he never is) 7.125 is a bargain.
I'd imagine that would include a hefty signing bonus from Paul allen -
Ian Rapoport @RapSheet 3m
#Seahawks DE Michael Bennett’s contract: 4 years for $28.5M with $10M coming in 2014. $16M over 2 years, $21M over 3. $16M guaranteed.
holy cow, what a steal! -
Yea if they can lock up Tate and McDonald then already another successful off season for PC and JS. I expect another Super Bowl next season.dhdawg said:at 8/8.5 I'm perfectly fine with this. Fine price. Clemons is going to be gone with a few hours
We also need to bring back McDonald and Tate. -
Looks like he did take less. Good on him.
-
He's making a fortune his first year. Front loading contracts is something the Patriots used to do years ago and it was a huge success for them. It seems like most teams back load their contracts now and then end up in cap hell (see Jerry Jones).
-
Nice! Let Tate go now unless you can get him for really cheap. There are lots of good WR's out there that can probably be had for bargains.
I think he's expendable and not a guy you want long term money tied up to. Harvin should play more than one game this year. There are guys with injury concerns/character issues that can probably be had for cheaper than Tate and might even give us better production. Hakeem Nicks, James Jones, Santonio Holmes, Kenny Britt, Jacoby Jones, Nate Burleson. Nicks and James Jones probably get comparable contracts to Tate, and may not be logical, but the other guys can probably be had for slightly more than the minimum. Sign one of those guys and draft a WR in the first few rounds. You save money and possibly get more talented at the same time.CuntWaffle said:No idea why people dont want to keep Tate. He is great for the team, too many people loom at the raw WR numbers.
I agree if some team is going to pay him a shitload of money let him walk... but if you can keep him at a decent price they should.
Use the money saved to find a new guard or a right tackle. That way you can go into the draft and pick the best player available in the first two rounds instead of possibly reaching to fill a need. -
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/eye-on-football/24476911/agents-take-calculating-2014-nfl-free-agent-target-prices
this is from the perspective of a former agent, says Tate gets 7.
If tate gets more than 3 years 16 or so I don't think I'm doing it



