Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A Reminder to all of you

2

Comments

  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,587
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I can't wait until 2017 and Kim is saying "you guys have no idea the damage that Sarkisian had done. I knew Sark wasn't the guy when he lost 41-0 to Stanford in 2010. He ran an undisciplined program where star athletes were getting busted for DUI's and Weed. The players were better at curling beer bottles than actual weights. That's why you need to give this current coach more time. Don't worry though guys Woodward gets it. Nobody could have predicted at the time that Sarkisian was going to fail. Woodward absolutely nailed this hire though so you guys need to stop worrying about this coach even though he has only gone 14-12 in his first two years at UW."

    Nominated!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,561 Founders Club
    Well said. Classy post.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tracker
    tracker Member Posts: 866

    I don't understand why you guys always bitch about Sark.

    I mean. . .he hit the fucking cross-bar!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I can't wait until 2017 and Kim is saying "you guys have no idea the damage that Sarkisian had done. I knew Sark wasn't the guy when he lost 41-0 to Stanford in 2010. He ran an undisciplined program where star athletes were getting busted for DUI's and Weed. The players were better at curling beer bottles than actual weights. That's why you need to give this current coach more time. Don't worry though guys Woodward gets it. Nobody could have predicted at the time that Sarkisian was going to fail. Woodward absolutely nailed this hire though so you guys need to stop worrying about this coach even though he has only gone 14-12 in his first two years at UW."

    POTD. Sadly that's pretty much exactly what will happen #thescript
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,587
    The only part you left out is where Kim tells everyone that he was very critical of Sark on the boards during his tenure as coach. You wouldn't remember because you haven't been a member that long.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    bananasnblondes said:

    The only part you left out is where Kim tells everyone that he was very critical of Sark on the boards during his tenure as coach. You wouldn't remember because you haven't been a member that long.

    Either way we all know they'll use revisionist history and point out the blowouts as reasons why they knew Sark wasn't the guy.

    Like Softy claiming he knew the suddenly senior loss to Stanford in 2006 was the moment Ty wasn't the right coach even though he defended that loser until he was 0-6 in 2008.

    I mean look at how these doogs praised Ty in december of 2007 for not being like Rick? "I'm glad Ty has at least cleaned up the program. Under Rick we had players breaking the law all the time. Rick was always out looking for other jobs. Rick ran an undisciplined program and neglected the OL".

    Everything those fucks complained about Rick back in the Ty era Sark is currently doing. Only difference being Sark hasn't won a Rose Bowl like Rick did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    When Sark is eventually fired the Doogs will call him Rick 2.0, point to the soft teams, lack of discipline, lack of OL recruiting etc.. Then they'll get behind the next guy who obviously needs 5+ years to change the atmosphere, get his own guys in there. At that point I may as well learn the 8 clap and support Mora while he wins a 4th straight Rose Bowl.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,413 Standard Supporter
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I can't wait until 2017 and Kim is saying "you guys have no idea the damage that Sarkisian had done. I knew Sark wasn't the guy when he lost 41-0 to Stanford in 2010. He ran an undisciplined program where star athletes were getting busted for DUI's and Weed. The players were better at curling beer bottles than actual weights. That's why you need to give this current coach more time. Don't worry though guys Woodward gets it. Nobody could have predicted at the time that Sarkisian was going to fail. Woodward absolutely nailed this hire though so you guys need to stop worrying about this coach even though he has only gone 14-12 in his first two years at UW."

    Take it to the Crystal Ball Forum or you're gone!

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 69,822 Founders Club
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    The only part you left out is where Kim tells everyone that he was very critical of Sark on the boards during his tenure as coach. You wouldn't remember because you haven't been a member that long.

    Either way we all know they'll use revisionist history and point out the blowouts as reasons why they knew Sark wasn't the guy.

    Like Softy claiming he knew the suddenly senior loss to Stanford in 2006 was the moment Ty wasn't the right coach even though he defended that loser until he was 0-6 in 2008.

    I mean look at how these doogs praised Ty in december of 2007 for not being like Rick? "I'm glad Ty has at least cleaned up the program. Under Rick we had players breaking the law all the time. Rick was always out looking for other jobs. Rick ran an undisciplined program and neglected the OL".

    Everything those fucks complained about Rick back in the Ty era Sark is currently doing. Only difference being Sark hasn't won a Rose Bowl like Rick did.
    Softy is guilty, but not to the degree you're claiming. He never said he knew that Ty was the wrong guy in 2006. What he said was he was hearing horror stories about Ty back in 2006. Which still begs the question of why he supported Ty in Dec 2007. His sincere answer was he thought the recruiting uptick justified sticking with Ty.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    DerekJohnson said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    The only part you left out is where Kim tells everyone that he was very critical of Sark on the boards during his tenure as coach. You wouldn't remember because you haven't been a member that long.

    Either way we all know they'll use revisionist history and point out the blowouts as reasons why they knew Sark wasn't the guy.

    Like Softy claiming he knew the suddenly senior loss to Stanford in 2006 was the moment Ty wasn't the right coach even though he defended that loser until he was 0-6 in 2008.

    I mean look at how these doogs praised Ty in december of 2007 for not being like Rick? "I'm glad Ty has at least cleaned up the program. Under Rick we had players breaking the law all the time. Rick was always out looking for other jobs. Rick ran an undisciplined program and neglected the OL".

    Everything those fucks complained about Rick back in the Ty era Sark is currently doing. Only difference being Sark hasn't won a Rose Bowl like Rick did.
    Softy is guilty, but not to the degree you're claiming. He never said he knew that Ty was the wrong guy in 2006. What he said was he was hearing horror stories about Ty back in 2006. Which still begs the question of why he supported Ty in Dec 2007. His sincere answer was he thought the recruiting uptick justified sticking with Ty.
    Still Derek if you are hearing "Horror stories" about a coach why are you publicly supporting that same coach a year later?

    I personally think it was a cop out and revisionist history. So if Sark is fired is he going to again claim he heard "horror stories" ?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter