2020 Election...this shouldn't be surprising.
Comments
-
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it. -
Hondo's at 250k. Burgers flipped!2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it. -
Lol Working Class GayBob!SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it. -
Can any figure out what this dumbfuck is trying to say here?CirrhosisDawg said:
Lol Working Class GayBob!SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it. -
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it.
Actually I'd be willing to bet that the average income of the liberals on this board is higher than the conservatives. -
So you don't know shit and are talking out your ass as per usual.2001400ex said:
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it.
Actually I'd be willing to bet that the average income of the liberals on this board is higher than the conservatives.
Is this like you "knew" only 60K legal immigrants are allowed into the country each year or that you knew the "prosecutor" put Clinton under oath in the Paula Jones depo? -
Trump’s barrage of attacks and investigations have devastated Biden.
How will Biden ever survive this onslaught from delusional trump trash?HoustonHusky said:Biden is toast. Everything including the betting lines are lined up behind Pocahontas now.
-
I'm saying I'd be willing to bet.SFGbob said:
So you don't know shit and are talking out your ass as per usual.2001400ex said:
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it.
Actually I'd be willing to bet that the average income of the liberals on this board is higher than the conservatives.
Is this like you "knew" only 60K legal immigrants are allowed into the country each year or that you knew the "prosecutor" put Clinton under oath in the Paula Jones depo? -
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.2001400ex said:
I'm saying I'd be willing to bet.SFGbob said:
So you don't know shit and are talking out your ass as per usual.2001400ex said:
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it.
Actually I'd be willing to bet that the average income of the liberals on this board is higher than the conservatives.
Is this like you "knew" only 60K legal immigrants are allowed into the country each year or that you knew the "prosecutor" put Clinton under oath in the Paula Jones depo?
You don't "know" shit. -
Ok Bob. Since you are repping that you make $250k a year. Then post up what exactly it is that you do. I'd bet you are retired living off a government pension.SFGbob said:
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.2001400ex said:
I'm saying I'd be willing to bet.SFGbob said:
So you don't know shit and are talking out your ass as per usual.2001400ex said:
I know that sure as fuck isn't you.SFGbob said:
How do you know?2001400ex said:
Yeah no. While 250k isn't a big number. That's not a big chunk of this board.Swaye said:
This. The naivety required to believe that raising rates on billionaires is going to generate enough money to pay for 5 trillion over 10 years in new taxes that will be required to implement her plans (which does not even include pieces of the Green New Deal) is either willful ignorance or complete idiotic bliss.SFGbob said:
Isn't she also calling for the repeal of the Trump tax cuts and a carbon tax as well as her wealth tax while she refuses to admit that her healthcare plan would raise taxes on everyone, including the middle class and only exclude taxing the poor?
To believe that Warren is only going to soak the rich is pretty fucking naive. Oh yeah, she also has promised to ban fracking which means higher fuel prices and that before she enacts her carbon tax.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/aug/18/elizabeth-warrens-plans-cost-5-trillion-over-10-ye/
I have no idea if these figures are accurate or not. But I found them, so I'm using them. Even if they are off it is still a STAGGERING sum of money to pay for all of her bullshit. Yeah, taxing the top 1/10th of 1 percent is going to cover it. LOL. Naive in the extreme. Historically Dems like attacking taxes at around the 250K per year mark. That's me. I would bet it's also a solid chunk of this bored. If Warren is elected I would bet my Rolex collection she targets "Upper Middle Class" fucks like me quick fast and in a hurry.
Throw in increased energy costs and it's a recipe to get me and millions of others to stop spending. That's great for the economy I hear. This shit is so simple to deduce. Yet Dems spend so much energy trying to do tortured mental gymnastics to convince us all that based on some nebulous bullshit that exists only in fantasy land this will somehow be better for me. Or something. Only true believers or genuine morons could possibly believe it.
Actually I'd be willing to bet that the average income of the liberals on this board is higher than the conservatives.
Is this like you "knew" only 60K legal immigrants are allowed into the country each year or that you knew the "prosecutor" put Clinton under oath in the Paula Jones depo?
You don't "know" shit.
