Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Reminder to far right fringe revisionists
Comments
-
You really ought to read the whistleblower complaint. Plenty there and plenty of leads for Mall Cop to follow-up on.MikeDamone said:So the whistleblower complaint has nothing. But the blocking of it is the crime. Always the cover up. It’s always the cover up.
You girls ever going to tell us where Federal Law excludes hearsay information? -
I was paraphrasing AOG in the OP. He said it’s the complaint isn’t a big deal. It’s blocking it that has caused the issue. Had he not blocked it, there would be no issue. Take it up with him, not me.HHusky said:
You really ought to read the whistleblower complaint. Plenty there and plenty of leads for Mall Cop to follow-up on.MikeDamone said:So the whistleblower complaint has nothing. But the blocking of it is the crime. Always the cover up. It’s always the cover up.
You girls ever going to tell us where Federal Law excludes hearsay information? -
Why do you want a president that elicits help from both Russia (which he received) and Ukraine to interfere in our elections? Why do you want to be a traitor to your country? But, my point is still that people are incorrect in saying the impeachment inquiry was started because of something IN the complaint. It was started because Mr Trump was not willing to turn over a complaint that named himself and his AG. That's illegal, and that is why he is going to be impeached. So don't twist.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turbo.ApostleofGrief said:
Yes, dumbfuck... because Trump was violating the law by blocking the release of the report. If the president violates the law, FLAGRANTLY! the motherfucker is impeached. That's the point of my post. If he'd simply turned over the whistleblower report, and blocked the transcript, he wouldn't be the subject of impeachment, would he? He's demonstrated idiocy in all aspects of this.Sledog said:
Yet they started impeachment talk before ever seeing it. Trump allowed them to see it. HTHRaceBannon said:
Breaking news?HHusky said:
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.Sledog said:
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.HHusky said:
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.Sledog said:
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.ApostleofGrief said:The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
“We’re gonna impeach the mother fucker!”
So yeah, the cart has been before the horse for sometime.
Here’s a interesting fact though, regardless of what happens, even if impeached, he will remain your president either to January 2021 or January 2025. -
He followed up with a "joke" about shooting the witnesses . . . er, I mean spies! These Articles of Impeachment almost write themselves.ApostleofGrief said:
Why do you want a president that elicits help from both Russia (which he received) and Ukraine to interfere in our elections? Why do you want to be a traitor to your country? But, my point is still that people are incorrect in saying the impeachment inquiry was started because of something IN the complaint. It was started because Mr Trump was not willing to turn over a complaint that named himself and his AG. That's illegal, and that is why he is going to be impeached. So don't twist.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turbo.ApostleofGrief said:
Yes, dumbfuck... because Trump was violating the law by blocking the release of the report. If the president violates the law, FLAGRANTLY! the motherfucker is impeached. That's the point of my post. If he'd simply turned over the whistleblower report, and blocked the transcript, he wouldn't be the subject of impeachment, would he? He's demonstrated idiocy in all aspects of this.Sledog said:
Yet they started impeachment talk before ever seeing it. Trump allowed them to see it. HTHRaceBannon said:
Breaking news?HHusky said:
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.Sledog said:
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.HHusky said:
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.Sledog said:
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.ApostleofGrief said:The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
“We’re gonna impeach the mother fucker!”
So yeah, the cart has been before the horse for sometime.
Here’s a interesting fact though, regardless of what happens, even if impeached, he will remain your president either to January 2021 or January 2025. -
I don’t want those things. I haven’t seen evidence beyond appeal to emotion and people hating him as a person that leads to me believe he’s committed treason. Tired of the emotional meltdowns and the the fact he’s been on in impeachment inquiry since before he was sworn in for reasons to be determined later. There is an election in 13 months. The people put him in, let’s let them remove him if they wish.ApostleofGrief said:
Why do you want a president that elicits help from both Russia (which he received) and Ukraine to interfere in our elections? Why do you want to be a traitor to your country? But, my point is still that people are incorrect in saying the impeachment inquiry was started because of something IN the complaint. It was started because Mr Trump was not willing to turn over a complaint that named himself and his AG. That's illegal, and that is why he is going to be impeached. So don't twist.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turbo.ApostleofGrief said:
Yes, dumbfuck... because Trump was violating the law by blocking the release of the report. If the president violates the law, FLAGRANTLY! the motherfucker is impeached. That's the point of my post. If he'd simply turned over the whistleblower report, and blocked the transcript, he wouldn't be the subject of impeachment, would he? He's demonstrated idiocy in all aspects of this.Sledog said:
Yet they started impeachment talk before ever seeing it. Trump allowed them to see it. HTHRaceBannon said:
Breaking news?HHusky said:
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.Sledog said:
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.HHusky said:
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.Sledog said:
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.ApostleofGrief said:The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
“We’re gonna impeach the mother fucker!”
So yeah, the cart has been before the horse for sometime.
Here’s a interesting fact though, regardless of what happens, even if impeached, he will remain your president either to January 2021 or January 2025. -
weakMikeDamone said:
I don’t want those things. I haven’t seen evidence beyond appeal to emotion and people hating him as a person that leads to me believe he’s committed treason. Tired of the emotional meltdowns and the the fact he’s been on in impeachment inquiry since before he was sworn in for reasons to be determined later. There is an election in 13 months. The people put him in, let’s let them remove him if they wish.ApostleofGrief said:
Why do you want a president that elicits help from both Russia (which he received) and Ukraine to interfere in our elections? Why do you want to be a traitor to your country? But, my point is still that people are incorrect in saying the impeachment inquiry was started because of something IN the complaint. It was started because Mr Trump was not willing to turn over a complaint that named himself and his AG. That's illegal, and that is why he is going to be impeached. So don't twist.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turbo.ApostleofGrief said:
Yes, dumbfuck... because Trump was violating the law by blocking the release of the report. If the president violates the law, FLAGRANTLY! the motherfucker is impeached. That's the point of my post. If he'd simply turned over the whistleblower report, and blocked the transcript, he wouldn't be the subject of impeachment, would he? He's demonstrated idiocy in all aspects of this.Sledog said:
Yet they started impeachment talk before ever seeing it. Trump allowed them to see it. HTHRaceBannon said:
Breaking news?HHusky said:
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.Sledog said:
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.HHusky said:
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.Sledog said:
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.ApostleofGrief said:The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
“We’re gonna impeach the mother fucker!”
So yeah, the cart has been before the horse for sometime.
Here’s a interesting fact though, regardless of what happens, even if impeached, he will remain your president either to January 2021 or January 2025. -
Glad to know you don’t have an argument. Just a logical fallacy. Nothing new from you.ApostleofGrief said:
weakMikeDamone said:
I don’t want those things. I haven’t seen evidence beyond appeal to emotion and people hating him as a person that leads to me believe he’s committed treason. Tired of the emotional meltdowns and the the fact he’s been on in impeachment inquiry since before he was sworn in for reasons to be determined later. There is an election in 13 months. The people put him in, let’s let them remove him if they wish.ApostleofGrief said:
Why do you want a president that elicits help from both Russia (which he received) and Ukraine to interfere in our elections? Why do you want to be a traitor to your country? But, my point is still that people are incorrect in saying the impeachment inquiry was started because of something IN the complaint. It was started because Mr Trump was not willing to turn over a complaint that named himself and his AG. That's illegal, and that is why he is going to be impeached. So don't twist.MikeDamone said:
Calm down turbo.ApostleofGrief said:
Yes, dumbfuck... because Trump was violating the law by blocking the release of the report. If the president violates the law, FLAGRANTLY! the motherfucker is impeached. That's the point of my post. If he'd simply turned over the whistleblower report, and blocked the transcript, he wouldn't be the subject of impeachment, would he? He's demonstrated idiocy in all aspects of this.Sledog said:
Yet they started impeachment talk before ever seeing it. Trump allowed them to see it. HTHRaceBannon said:
Breaking news?HHusky said:
Nobody thought you could impeach based on a whistleblower complaint, Officer Fife. If you were a real cop you might consider exploring who the first hand witnesses are. You might even go so far as to speak to them.Sledog said:
In this instance first hand knowledge is required. It's been pointed out to you. You think you get to impeach the president on made up bullshit? Of course you do. Try and get a search warrant on little Johnny with that line counsuelo! I heard you are a member of NAMBLA and molest children. I think I'll go talk to a judge about a warrant for your home, office and all electronic devices.HHusky said:
Really? “I heard some kids say Johnny threatened to plant a bomb at school.” Not urgent, right? Can’t look into it because it’s hearsay.Sledog said:
Not urgent. Hearsay is never urgent. Keep trying.ApostleofGrief said:The reason impeachment was initiated as an inquiry was strictly because the White House blocked an urgent whistleblower report. It was not started because Trump was working a quid pro quo of dirt for aid. That ensures it will happen though
This is how we know your “retirement” was a welcome development at the mall. You must have sucked at your job. You may be the stupidest fucking TugCon here, and that’s saying something!
You are definitely the dumbest attorney I have ever interacted with and that is saying something!
“We’re gonna impeach the mother fucker!”
So yeah, the cart has been before the horse for sometime.
Here’s a interesting fact though, regardless of what happens, even if impeached, he will remain your president either to January 2021 or January 2025. -
You ever going to understand that they don't use it in these instances? Read up consuelo!HHusky said:
You really ought to read the whistleblower complaint. Plenty there and plenty of leads for Mall Cop to follow-up on.MikeDamone said:So the whistleblower complaint has nothing. But the blocking of it is the crime. Always the cover up. It’s always the cover up.
You girls ever going to tell us where Federal Law excludes hearsay information? -
So your answer is No.Sledog said:
You ever going to understand that they don't use it in these instances? Read up consuelo!HHusky said:
You really ought to read the whistleblower complaint. Plenty there and plenty of leads for Mall Cop to follow-up on.MikeDamone said:So the whistleblower complaint has nothing. But the blocking of it is the crime. Always the cover up. It’s always the cover up.
You girls ever going to tell us where Federal Law excludes hearsay information? -
It was a low-hanging opportunity to drop my favorite copypoasta. You & AOG made it actually funny.2001400ex said:
While I generally find you hilarious.... You are better than that. You know I was right and understand the intent of my comment, even if you don't like it.GrundleStiltzkin said:Wake up to find Hondo arguing with a pretty black woman from Alabama. Gonna be a great day.
-
Your answer is you don't have a clue but you'll make shit up as you go like the rest of them. Very intelligent!HHusky said:
So your answer is No.Sledog said:
You ever going to understand that they don't use it in these instances? Read up consuelo!HHusky said:
You really ought to read the whistleblower complaint. Plenty there and plenty of leads for Mall Cop to follow-up on.MikeDamone said:So the whistleblower complaint has nothing. But the blocking of it is the crime. Always the cover up. It’s always the cover up.
You girls ever going to tell us where Federal Law excludes hearsay information?
Russia 2.0 because the left is in free fall.
