Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

'They aren't tiny, tiny details to us... they're the difference between winning and losing'

sarktastic
sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
edited March 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
God, I love Peterman.

(Radio interview on ESPN Seattle between 1-2 pm today)
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,167
    I can't even put it into words how good it feels to have a coach that actually understands what it takes to win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Lossless .OGG link or it didn't happen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,167
    Offseason Natty Three-Peat!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DeepPurple
    DeepPurple Member Posts: 201
    I'll be curious to see how Pete plays out compared to Rick. I thought Rick had a lot of potential after the RB win, but that loss at Michigan due to too many guys on the field... and the meltdown against Texas in the Holiday Bowl really set back my view of Rick... just didn't seem to have the attention to detail that James had... and that it sounds like Pete has.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EsophagealFeces
    EsophagealFeces Member Posts: 13,167
    DeepPurple said:

    I'll be curious to see how Pete plays out compared to Rick. I thought Rick had a lot of potential after the RB win, but that loss at Michigan due to too many guys on the field... and the meltdown against Texas in the Holiday Bowl really set back my view of Rick... just didn't seem to have the attention to detail that James had... and that it sounds like Pete has.

    I think Peterman is a lot closer to James than he is to Rick. Not the most charismatic, but sincere, detail oriented, and most importantly: a winner.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DeepPurple
    DeepPurple Member Posts: 201
    EsophagealFeces said:

    DeepPurple said:

    I'll be curious to see how Pete plays out compared to Rick. I thought Rick had a lot of potential after the RB win, but that loss at Michigan due to too many guys on the field... and the meltdown against Texas in the Holiday Bowl really set back my view of Rick... just didn't seem to have the attention to detail that James had... and that it sounds like Pete has.

    I think Peterman is a lot closer to James than he is to Rick. Not the most charismatic, but sincere, detail oriented, and most importantly: a winner.
    Yes indeed. As I've said before, after sitting out 3 entire coaching regimes, I'll probably get season tickets again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    EsophagealFeces said:

    I can't even put it into words how good it feels to have a coach that actually understands what it takes to win consistently.

    Fixed.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • tracker
    tracker Member Posts: 866
    edited March 2014
    Oh, sure. .you can win a lot of games by paying attention to details but will our players still be able to, "Play Fast, Be Free?"
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SweatpantsGeneral
    SweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,161 Founders Club
    mynorthwest.com/category/pod_player_sports/?a=9968636&p=1014&n=Bob%20and%20Groz%20Show
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Sark paid attention to details. I mean he did bring in a tiger to prepare for LSU.

    Sure the score was 41-3 but that score wasn't indicative of the game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Fuck Rick was Bear Bryant smash mouth compared to Sark. And Ricky was a penny loafer wearing California faggot. Petersen doesn't have to do much to be the best coach UW has ever had.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LouieLouie
    LouieLouie Member Posts: 12
    Dardanus said:

    I always thought the keys to success were ignoring the O-Line, Special Teams, and penalties. Just focus on WRs with talent, and talk a big game in the off-season.

    "We've looked into it and penalties have no effect on the chances of winning" - Steve Sarkisian
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    No disrespect to Don James, but Petersen could be more productive in shorter terms, in percentages respective to win-losses, major bowls, nfl draftees etc...Pete won't be here near as long as DJ, but he can make a bigger impact in relative measure. Shit maybe we can get 15 years out of Pete. I'd love to see these two matched up after a significant period of time. But this is apples to oranges as the times are so different . Forget I brought it up, let's talk about the 2 deeps some more or how good the players hips and biceps look
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    edited March 2014
    Unlike the Doogs I actually like Petersen's interviews more than Sark's. It feels more real and for the first time since Rick I actually get pumped listening to a UW coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fuck Rick was Bear Bryant smash mouth compared to Sark. And Ricky was a penny loafer wearing California faggot. Petersen doesn't have to do much to be the best coach UW has ever had.

    Gil Dobie???? Don James???

    It would take quite a bit to be the best coach we've ever had.

    Hopefully this is your brother again as this is fucktarded even by your piss poor standards.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    I will give Slick credit in the sense that he clearly could find ways to motivate his players. I think he could win with a good staff around him. He was a good recruiter. He wasn't great at figuring out roster composition, etc. I think he also got a bit of a raw deal at UCLA because he started the turn around that Mora is riding right now. UCLA was borderline broken when Slick took on that job.

    Petersen just strikes you as a guy that gets it. He gets how to win. He gets that it's important for everybody to be on the same page. He gets that the sum of the parts can be greater than the sum of the individual components. He has a track record of performance to indicate that he gets it.

    Too often Sark failed in the sense that when watching his team the sum of the individuals was greater than the sum of the parts.

    I know that I'm cautiously optimistic that we might see a great season this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Tequilla said:



    Petersen just strikes you as a guy that gets it. ... He gets that the sum of the parts can be greater than the sum of the individual components....

    Too often Sark failed in the sense that when watching his team the sum of the individuals was greater than the sum of the parts.

    ....

    the fuck?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    For the uneducated:

    Petersen makes his team better

    Sark makes his team worse
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    Now can you tell us the difference between parts and components?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Unlike the Doogs I actually like Petersen's interviews more than Sark's. It feels more real and for the first time since Rick I actually get pumped listening to a UW coach.

    Petersen's interviews are actually refreshing if what you're interested in is some insight into our new coach's knowledge and enthusiasm for real football. I didn't listen to many Sark interviews for if you heard one, it seemed like you'd heard em all.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Tailgater said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Unlike the Doogs I actually like Petersen's interviews more than Sark's. It feels more real and for the first time since Rick I actually get pumped listening to a UW coach.

    Petersen's interviews are actually refreshing if what you're interested in is some insight into our new coach's knowledge and enthusiasm for real football. I didn't listen to many Sark interviews for if you heard one, it seemed like you'd heard em all.

    "Quite honestly" got old the 23rd time, quite honestly.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,066
    Dardanus said:

    I always thought the keys to success were ignoring the O-Line, Special Teams, and penalties. Just focus on WRs with talent, and talk a big game in the off-season.

    and kick ass pressers and floppy hats.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • halfbrainmanmolder
    halfbrainmanmolder Member Posts: 215
    sarktastic said:

    Now can you tell us the difference between parts and components?

    One has 4 or was it 5 letters while the other one I am too lazy to count ...

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Fuck Rick was Bear Bryant smash mouth compared to Sark. And Ricky was a penny loafer wearing California faggot. Petersen doesn't have to do much to be the best coach UW has ever had.

    I support penny loafer wearing faggots from California that win Rose Bowls.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Are we talking tiny tiny details or teeny weeny details? What about just tiny details vs tiny tiny details.

    Tiny Details was my gay porn name in the 80s
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    They're tiny, tiny details to Mark Helfrich. But it's all good. Every dude on the team is a tough, tough guy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dawgfan406
    Dawgfan406 Member Posts: 192
    Tailgater said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Unlike the Doogs I actually like Petersen's interviews more than Sark's. It feels more real and for the first time since Rick I actually get pumped listening to a UW coach.

    Petersen's interviews are actually refreshing if what you're interested in is some insight into our new coach's knowledge and enthusiasm for real football. I didn't listen to many Sark interviews for if you heard one, it seemed like you'd heard em all.

    Used to love listening to how full of shit sark was. He had a 3-game losing streak every year so for almost a full calendar month every fall he hadn't won a game.

    I used to laugh listening to his bullshit pressers after losses. Gonna kinda miss that. L.A. media will eat him alive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    I placed tiny classified ads in newspapers and was able to make $50,000 a week from my tiny one-bedroom apartment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter