Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
How do we match up against USC's Elite + Tall receiving corp?
Comments
-
I think Latu will be able to rush just fineGrundleStiltzkin said:
I don't like loosing Tryon in passing downs. He's been decent there.WilburHooksHands said:
More Latu and McDuffie are going to be very good things. The defense will dial itself in over the course of the year and it’s already looking pretty good all things considered. LB is the only real concern for me.dannarc said:Without tryon, more Latu
-
WhoeverHomebrew_Dawg said:
Whomever is responsible for that shit call needs:RaceBannon said:
2nd half right?UWhuskytskeet said:
Would be nice to have Tryon.dhdawg said:The home crowd will help the passrush, which will be the difference between a win and a loss IMO
That was a shit call
-
We don’t and lose by 200. I mean SC has a freaking Egyptian God playing WR for them.
-
Bowman inside on obvious passing downs too. Like Benning, I think here’s really an undersized, disruptive DT than an outside guy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I don't like loosing Tryon in passing downs. He's been decent there.WilburHooksHands said:
More Latu and McDuffie are going to be very good things. The defense will dial itself in over the course of the year and it’s already looking pretty good all things considered. LB is the only real concern for me.dannarc said:Without tryon, more Latu
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your offense is too dreck to get in a legit shootout with most PAC 12 teams. You'll have to rely on that second class defense to eke out a win.
