Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Ever get the feeling you've been cheated? - Hondo Bros perform their favorite act
SFGbob
Member Posts: 33,183
in Tug Tavern
They swallowed like bitches
The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower’s concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration’s determination that the complaint didn’t fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.
This anonymous person has no direct knowledge of the call and his/her “concerns” come from information that was not “obtained during the course of their work”. Thus, this person doesn’t fit the title of a whistleblower. Yet, that is still the narrative in the media. There is no whistleblower, there is only a leaker with an agenda to push. This story stinks to high heaven.
White House and the Justice Department, according to reports, are rightfully advising the director of national intelligence that the complaint isn’t covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. So far, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has not agreed to cooperate in releasing a transcript of the president’s conversation. Maguire will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday behind closed doors.
The whistleblower didn’t have direct knowledge of the communications, an official briefed on the matter told CNN. Instead, the whistleblower’s concerns came in part from learning information that was not obtained during the course of their work, and those details have played a role in the administration’s determination that the complaint didn’t fit the reporting requirements under the intelligence whistleblower law, the official said.
This anonymous person has no direct knowledge of the call and his/her “concerns” come from information that was not “obtained during the course of their work”. Thus, this person doesn’t fit the title of a whistleblower. Yet, that is still the narrative in the media. There is no whistleblower, there is only a leaker with an agenda to push. This story stinks to high heaven.
White House and the Justice Department, according to reports, are rightfully advising the director of national intelligence that the complaint isn’t covered by the laws applying to intelligence whistleblowers. So far, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has not agreed to cooperate in releasing a transcript of the president’s conversation. Maguire will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday behind closed doors.
Comments
-
Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
TugCons don’t wanna see it. In Daddy we trust. -
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed? -
The law is irrelevant to attorneys.SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed? -
So the IG rendered an opinion without looking into it? Final answer?SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed? -
I don't know what the IG knows or doesn't know. I'm not a mind reader like you Kunt.HHusky said:
So the IG rendered an opinion without looking into it? Final answer?SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed?
But I know this story is blowing up in your face because you're a gullible dipshit. I told you Kunts to pump the brakes and I also predicted that you wouldn't do so. -
Contrived legal arguments are a tell. It’s not in dispute that this “nothing burger” hasn’t been turned over.SFGbob said:
I don't know what the IG knows or doesn't know. I'm not a mind reader like you Kunt.HHusky said:
So the IG rendered an opinion without looking into it? Final answer?SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed?
But I know this story is blowing up in your face because you're a gullible dipshit. I told you Kunts to pump the brakes and I also predicted that you wouldn't do so. -
It's not cheating if hondo invites the bull over
-
President's are perfectly within their rights to use executive privilege in order to keep their private conversations private. Congress can't pass a law that gets rid of executive privilege. We now find out that this "whistle blower" isn't even covered by the law.HHusky said:
Contrived legal arguments are a tell. It’s not in dispute that this “nothing burger” hasn’t been turned over.SFGbob said:
I don't know what the IG knows or doesn't know. I'm not a mind reader like you Kunt.HHusky said:
So the IG rendered an opinion without looking into it? Final answer?SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed?
But I know this story is blowing up in your face because you're a gullible dipshit. I told you Kunts to pump the brakes and I also predicted that you wouldn't do so.
You swallowed like a fucking bitch O'Keefed. -
Some of Trump’s allies have seized on this alleged lack of “direct knowledge” to discredit the whistle-blower, but “a source close to the whistle-blower’s legal team” disputed the unnamed official’s characterization, saying the intelligence community’s inspector general would not accept “thirdhand disclosures.”HHusky said:
So the IG rendered an opinion without looking into it? Final answer?SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed? -
Third, fourth, fifth, tenth. Where does it end for you loons?GDS said:
Some of Trump’s allies have seized on this alleged lack of “direct knowledge” to discredit the whistle-blower, but “a source close to the whistle-blower’s legal team” disputed the unnamed official’s characterization, saying the intelligence community’s inspector general would not accept “thirdhand disclosures.”HHusky said:
So the IG rendered an opinion without looking into it? Final answer?SFGbob said:
Maybe he wasn't aware of what the "whistle-blower" used to make his claim. Weird how the Kunt who was banging the table claiming Trump was violating the law no longer cares about the requirements of the law.HHusky said:Weird how the IG appointed by Daddy says it’s credible and urgent. Partisan!
What's it like always swallowing like a bitch O'Keefed? -
So far, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has not agreed to cooperate in releasing a transcript of the president’s conversation. Maguire will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday behind closed doors.
I thought team hondo revered our 17 intel agencies -
Let’s ignore the fact that he will be there explaining why he should be allowed to continue to defy the law.RaceBannon said:So far, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has not agreed to cooperate in releasing a transcript of the president’s conversation. Maguire will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday behind closed doors.
I thought team hondo revered our 17 intel agencies -
Did you get an advance copy? Care to share it?HHusky said:
Let’s ignore the fact that he will be there explaining why he should be allowed to continue to defy the law.RaceBannon said:So far, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has not agreed to cooperate in releasing a transcript of the president’s conversation. Maguire will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday behind closed doors.
I thought team hondo revered our 17 intel agencies
I want to hear the explanation because I want the FACTS to come out -
Because the law doesn't cover someone who is leaking gossip they've heard and because the law can't compel the President to produce something that is covered by EP.HHusky said:
Let’s ignore the fact that he will be there explaining why he should be allowed to continue to defy the law.RaceBannon said:So far, the acting Director of National Intelligence, Joseph Maguire, has not agreed to cooperate in releasing a transcript of the president’s conversation. Maguire will testify before the House Intelligence Committee Thursday behind closed doors.
I thought team hondo revered our 17 intel agencies
You suck as lawyer.
