How do we match up against USC's Elite + Tall receiving corp?
Get lots of pressure on the QB forcing bad throws
Make the USC WRs pay when the catch the ball causing alligator arms
Jam really well giving defense time to get to the QB - play a lot of man
I'm not optimistic about our ability to execute these things. Could be a shootout. Our small secondary could be a problem this game.
Comments
-
I am more concerned with LB playing in the proper passing lanes. DB room will figure it out
-
Early in the game the USC quarterback must go down and he must go down hard
-
Utah played pretty solid defense you know other than losing 4 jump balls
-
That's both awful and awesome!RaceBannon said:Early in the game the USC quarterback must go down and he must go down hard
-
I see Interceptions
-
The home crowd will help the passrush, which will be the difference between a win and a loss IMO
-
Would be nice to have Tryon.dhdawg said:The home crowd will help the passrush, which will be the difference between a win and a loss IMO
-
My #1 concern is how we get them off the field consistently.
All year when we rush 3/4 we can't get pressure.
We are bringing extra lb's or Bryant via blitzes 50% of passing plays and get home with it I would guess 20% of the time. Doing that against SC and their 4/5 wr's in that vacated space is going to lead to huge gains.
Do we have anyone who can cover Pittman and St. Brown?
If we get the BYU/Fresno St/1st quarter Stanford SC team none of this matters, If we get the USC that played Friday night vs. Utah then we have a problem.
-
2nd half right?UWhuskytskeet said:
Would be nice to have Tryon.dhdawg said:The home crowd will help the passrush, which will be the difference between a win and a loss IMO
That was a shit call -
Your offense is too dreck to get in a legit shootout with most PAC 12 teams. You'll have to rely on that second class defense to eke out a win.
-
This is a pumpy level bad takeoregonblitzkrieg said:Your offense is too dreck to get in a legit shootout with most PAC 12 teams. You'll have to rely on that second class defense to eke out a win.
-
This is the type of shit you were posting last year when Oregon was rich, cool, and 3-1. That was right before you disappeared for 8 months.oregonblitzkrieg said:Your offense is too dreck to get in a legit shootout with most PAC 12 teams. You'll have to rely on that second class defense to eke out a win.
-
I like the Trojans in this one.
-
The Trojans are drecky enough to lose this game. But they aren't bad enough to lose Clay Helton as HC.
Urban Meyer won't be coaching at USC. -
this is a quookish, delusional takeoregonblitzkrieg said:Your offense is too dreck to get in a legit shootout with most PAC 12 teams. You'll have to rely on that second class defense to eke out a win.
this is another quookish, delusional takeoregonblitzkrieg said:The Trojans are drecky enough to lose this game. But they aren't bad enough to lose Clay Helton as HC.
Urban Meyer won't be coaching at USC. -
Follow his predecessor.
SevenWinSark 101: patron, patron, fight the fuck on and get fired. -
Without tryon, more Latu
-
Whomever is responsible for that shit call needs:RaceBannon said:
2nd half right?UWhuskytskeet said:
Would be nice to have Tryon.dhdawg said:The home crowd will help the passrush, which will be the difference between a win and a loss IMO
That was a shit call
-
More Latu and McDuffie are going to be very good things. The defense will dial itself in over the course of the year and it’s already looking pretty good all things considered. LB is the only real concern for me.dannarc said:Without tryon, more Latu
-
I don't like loosing Tryon in passing downs. He's been decent there.WilburHooksHands said:
More Latu and McDuffie are going to be very good things. The defense will dial itself in over the course of the year and it’s already looking pretty good all things considered. LB is the only real concern for me.dannarc said:Without tryon, more Latu
-
I think Latu will be able to rush just fineGrundleStiltzkin said:
I don't like loosing Tryon in passing downs. He's been decent there.WilburHooksHands said:
More Latu and McDuffie are going to be very good things. The defense will dial itself in over the course of the year and it’s already looking pretty good all things considered. LB is the only real concern for me.dannarc said:Without tryon, more Latu
-
WhoeverHomebrew_Dawg said:
Whomever is responsible for that shit call needs:RaceBannon said:
2nd half right?UWhuskytskeet said:
Would be nice to have Tryon.dhdawg said:The home crowd will help the passrush, which will be the difference between a win and a loss IMO
That was a shit call -
We don’t and lose by 200. I mean SC has a freaking Egyptian God playing WR for them.
-
Bowman inside on obvious passing downs too. Like Benning, I think here’s really an undersized, disruptive DT than an outside guy.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I don't like loosing Tryon in passing downs. He's been decent there.WilburHooksHands said:
More Latu and McDuffie are going to be very good things. The defense will dial itself in over the course of the year and it’s already looking pretty good all things considered. LB is the only real concern for me.dannarc said:Without tryon, more Latu
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Your offense is too dreck to get in a legit shootout with most PAC 12 teams. You'll have to rely on that second class defense to eke out a win.
