Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

On managing young talent

2»

Comments

  • Emoterman
    Emoterman Member Posts: 3,333

    The OP is off his rocker. How are Spiker or Osborne elite talents? Because of their high school rating.

    Spiker ran a 4.8 at a camp. He was ranked highly because of his high school production, not because he’s an incredible athlete. Osborne was a mid 4 star recruit. Neither of these guys are going to be stars.

    Nothing wrong with that. Not every 4 star is going to be a really good player. Star ratings are percentages. That’s it. Quit taking them so literally.

    Next year will be the same shit except it will be "why aren't we playing McMillan and Rome?"


    Oh and "why the fuck didnt we redshirt Fuller?"
    Except if we aren't playing McMillan, either TBSing is broken, or the coaches are FS about seniority. He's a borderline 5* that has film that shows he's a more or less complete receiver with the physical tools to play today.
  • Peterman
    Peterman Member Posts: 675
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793

    Arguing that Azeem should have started over BBK is not only dumb but flies in the face of "we should play the young guys" argument. Azeem was great as a junior but something happened before his senior year that he never recovered from. When he did play as a senior he looked like a 40 year old drunk guy running around out there with a big beer gut and talking shit after every play.

    He also sucked in pass coverage.