Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kim says spring ball should be interesting

DugtheDoog
DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
in Hardcore Husky Board
If Sark's 'edgy' recruits buy into Petermen's system, it will be interesting. If they don't buy in, it will be interesting. Sark recruited a lot of guys Petermen would never touch. Either way it should be interesting. Stay tuned...
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Going to get crazy out here, out here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • blackmamba
    blackmamba Member Posts: 184
    Will Petermen be able to hit the goalpost?
    Will the dog races be as competitive as last spring?
    Who will win the golf closest to the pin contest?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    Kim's a fucking idiot ... KNOWN FACT.

    Kim's reading comprehension sucks ... TWISTING.

    Kim never deletes posts ... or so he says.

    Kim likes to use the phrase "bad for business" to describe those that don't think he's right all the time ... but then again, Kim wouldn't know what "bad for business" meant if it hit him in the face.

    And BTW, I find it really fucking amusing when a fucking real estate guy tries to tell actual smart business people that they "don't get it" ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencaveman
    unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    And BTW, I find it really fucking amusing when a fucking RESIDENTIAL real estate guy tries to tell actual smart business people that they "don't get it"

    The differentiation is needed, not sure he would know anything about selling an investment or commercial property
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    GREAT POINT!!!

    You do actually have to be relatively intelligent to sell to those that make their living in real estate.

    To the average idiot that doesn't know anything more than House = American Dream, the blind leading the blind works quite well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,057
    spring ball is always interesting, everywhere, and every year.

    it's the nature of thing. hope springs eternal and all that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    creepycoug said:

    spring ball is never interesting, everywhere, and every year.

    it's the nature of thing. hope springs eternal and all that.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGDBR2L5kzI
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    DugtheDoog said:

    If Sark's 'edgy' recruits buy into Petermen's system, it will be interesting. If they don't buy in, it will be interesting. Sark recruited a lot of guys Petermen would never touch. Either way it should be interesting. Stay tuned...

    Gotta love how kim is an authority on who Petersen would recruit, and who he wouldn't recruit. It's incredible that he has such insight.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    Looks like I'm now officially bad for business as I've decided that the snarky responses from him and his staff deserve two way responses ...

    Got to love that "censorship doesn't exist" except for when you put the setting on saying that your posts have to approved before being posted.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    And BTW Kim, thanks for telling me to take screenshots about a month ago ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,513
    It's funny, and incredibly pathetic. Every time there Is a post by Kim there is a 100% chance that its going to be a subtle shot at the current football coach. It doesn't take a genius to decode what he's saying: "Coach Petersen (aka Tyrone Willingham) will be running off the good players and recruiting a bunch of slow, unathletic kids. This is different than Steve Sarkisian (aka Pete Carroll) who really connects to athletic kids and brings in the best talent."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tailgater
    Tailgater Member Posts: 1,389
    DugtheDoog said:

    Sark recruited a lot of guys Petersen would never touch ??

    I don't believe we or anybody, least of all Dm.c know that as yet. Petersen recruits the same ground as Sark and probably more and he brought not a small number of inner-city kids up from California and Texas to Boise as well as from weird outposts of civilization such as Alaska and Canada. What's more impressive to me about Petersen's recruiting at BSU was how he and his program could take Pacific Northwest kids and develop them into BCS caliber football playing athletes. Yes, we can expect to see more of that from coach Pete at UW.

    If anything, I would say without really knowing for certain that Sark would never even know about, much less touch, some of the kids that Petersen will recruit regardless of where they might come from.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    Passion said:

    DugtheDoog said:

    If Sark's 'edgy' recruits buy into Petermen's system, it will be interesting. If they don't buy in, it will be interesting. Sark recruited a lot of guys Petermen would never touch. Either way it should be interesting. Stay tuned...

    Gotta love how kim is an authority on who Petersen would recruit, and who he wouldn't recruit. It's incredible that he has such insight.
    Vegas would gladly bet money against whatever predictions are made by Kim and Co.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • fauxdawgman
    fauxdawgman Member Posts: 222
    Not in the middle of the store.

    If there's a problem, shoot us a PM, although a few of you seem bent on twisting stuff.

    brb blonde anal beads, vibrator, Dawgnews and Fetters train
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    I'm pretty sure Peterman recruited Titus Young. So who exactly has Sark ever recruited that's worse than that guy?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    No one. The discussion ends when Titus Young is brought up.
    allpurpleallgold said:

    I'm pretty sure Peterman recruited Titus Young. So who exactly has Sark ever recruited that's worse than that guy?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    Listen guys. This is 4th grade shit. Seriously embarrassing to read. If this board wants to stomp kim this is hardly advanced discussion. You guys look like a bunch of girls sitting around in kindergarden art class eating paste (which is symbolic as hell) throwing clay at each other. Grow the fuck up bitches, holy fuckall!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    No one. The discussion ends when Titus Young is brought up.

    allpurpleallgold said:

    I'm pretty sure Peterman recruited Titus Young. So who exactly has Sark ever recruited that's worse than that guy?

    This will never make it through Kim's Berlin Wall style of censorship .. so here's my response back - and Pepsi is right on the mark here

    We'll he did. I think the more interesting question would be.....why?

    But you don't know the answer to that. Nobody does not named Chris Petersen.

    The entire discussion has centered around Petersen not taking the guys that Sark did ... and we know that the company line is that Sark and staff were great recruiters (let's not let facts like 4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, and 5-4 OR his record in games where he trailed at halftime get in the way) and that if Sark would have stayed that he would have landed a MONSTER class this year. The idea being pushed is that Petersen wouldn't have recruited the guys that Sark would have (read Petersen might not be able to deliver said MONSTER class) and that since the roster consists of plenty of guys that Sark recruited that have an "edge" (btw, most football players have that), there's going to be a massive problem with this "culture shift."

    Yet, when countered with a guy that unquestionably has more character flaws than the example presented and that player WAS on Petersen's team, there's no possible comeback. NONE.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,142
    Tequilla said:



    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    No one. The discussion ends when Titus Young is brought up.

    allpurpleallgold said:

    I'm pretty sure Peterman recruited Titus Young. So who exactly has Sark ever recruited that's worse than that guy?

    This will never make it through Kim's Berlin Wall style of censorship .. so here's my response back - and Pepsi is right on the mark here

    We'll he did. I think the more interesting question would be.....why?

    But you don't know the answer to that. Nobody does not named Chris Petersen.

    The entire discussion has centered around Petersen not taking the guys that Sark did ... and we know that the company line is that Sark and staff were great recruiters (let's not let facts like 4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, and 5-4 OR his record in games where he trailed at halftime get in the way) and that if Sark would have stayed that he would have landed a MONSTER class this year. The idea being pushed is that Petersen wouldn't have recruited the guys that Sark would have (read Petersen might not be able to deliver said MONSTER class) and that since the roster consists of plenty of guys that Sark recruited that have an "edge" (btw, most football players have that), there's going to be a massive problem with this "culture shift."

    Yet, when countered with a guy that unquestionably has more character flaws than the example presented and that player WAS on Petersen's team, there's no possible comeback. NONE.
    I stopped reading at 5-4, 5-4, 5-4. They were 9-4 and ranked 25th. If Coons made two FG's in 2012, Sark would have had back to back 9-4 seasons.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:



    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    No one. The discussion ends when Titus Young is brought up.

    allpurpleallgold said:

    I'm pretty sure Peterman recruited Titus Young. So who exactly has Sark ever recruited that's worse than that guy?

    This will never make it through Kim's Berlin Wall style of censorship .. so here's my response back - and Pepsi is right on the mark here

    We'll he did. I think the more interesting question would be.....why?

    But you don't know the answer to that. Nobody does not named Chris Petersen.

    The entire discussion has centered around Petersen not taking the guys that Sark did ... and we know that the company line is that Sark and staff were great recruiters (let's not let facts like 4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, and 5-4 OR his record in games where he trailed at halftime get in the way) and that if Sark would have stayed that he would have landed a MONSTER class this year. The idea being pushed is that Petersen wouldn't have recruited the guys that Sark would have (read Petersen might not be able to deliver said MONSTER class) and that since the roster consists of plenty of guys that Sark recruited that have an "edge" (btw, most football players have that), there's going to be a massive problem with this "culture shift."

    Yet, when countered with a guy that unquestionably has more character flaws than the example presented and that player WAS on Petersen's team, there's no possible comeback. NONE.
    I stopped reading at 5-4, 5-4, 5-4. They were 9-4 and ranked 25th. If Coons made two FG's in 2012, Sark would have had back to back 9-4 seasons.

    Disagree as this year was a mythical 11-2 season. Remember the season fell apart once Van Winkle got hurt. It made sense once I found that out.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:



    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    No one. The discussion ends when Titus Young is brought up.

    allpurpleallgold said:

    I'm pretty sure Peterman recruited Titus Young. So who exactly has Sark ever recruited that's worse than that guy?

    This will never make it through Kim's Berlin Wall style of censorship .. so here's my response back - and Pepsi is right on the mark here

    We'll he did. I think the more interesting question would be.....why?

    But you don't know the answer to that. Nobody does not named Chris Petersen.

    The entire discussion has centered around Petersen not taking the guys that Sark did ... and we know that the company line is that Sark and staff were great recruiters (let's not let facts like 4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, and 5-4 OR his record in games where he trailed at halftime get in the way) and that if Sark would have stayed that he would have landed a MONSTER class this year. The idea being pushed is that Petersen wouldn't have recruited the guys that Sark would have (read Petersen might not be able to deliver said MONSTER class) and that since the roster consists of plenty of guys that Sark recruited that have an "edge" (btw, most football players have that), there's going to be a massive problem with this "culture shift."

    Yet, when countered with a guy that unquestionably has more character flaws than the example presented and that player WAS on Petersen's team, there's no possible comeback. NONE.
    I stopped reading at 5-4, 5-4, 5-4. They were 9-4 and ranked 25th. If Coons made two FG's in 2012, Sark would have had back to back 9-4 seasons.

    Fuck you and your Kimmie-inspired response.

    Anybody that is too FS to understand what 4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, and 5-4 is and tries to debate around that by pointing to pointless beatdowns of overmatched opponents like the Idaho State Spud Jumpers and saying wins like that are meaningful in the grand scheme of things should go watch a double feature of Lemon Party and 2 girls 1 cup.

    These same FS people think that winning the (Unsponsored) Fight Hunger Bowl is a great season. Fuck that. Competing for conference championships in November, going to Rose Bowls, and winning big games on big stages are what good seasons are made of.

    (And yes, I realize that you were whoosing, but since a FS person monitors these boreds like he's fucking Santa making out his naughty or nice list, I'm more than happy to take that opportunity to make a non-PC response).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,309 Founders Club
    The rebuttal to Kim's line that Peterman can't recruit the same caliber of talent is to point out what each coach did with his respective talent.

    Peterman's lesser talent won a lot more games than Sark's all-world talent coaches by the best staff in 'Merica.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter