Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Kim says spring ball should be interesting
DugtheDoog
Member Posts: 3,180
If Sark's 'edgy' recruits buy into Petermen's system, it will be interesting. If they don't buy in, it will be interesting. Sark recruited a lot of guys Petermen would never touch. Either way it should be interesting. Stay tuned...
Comments
Will the dog races be as competitive as last spring?
Who will win the golf closest to the pin contest?
Kim's reading comprehension sucks ... TWISTING.
Kim never deletes posts ... or so he says.
Kim likes to use the phrase "bad for business" to describe those that don't think he's right all the time ... but then again, Kim wouldn't know what "bad for business" meant if it hit him in the face.
And BTW, I find it really fucking amusing when a fucking real estate guy tries to tell actual smart business people that they "don't get it" ...
The differentiation is needed, not sure he would know anything about selling an investment or commercial property
You do actually have to be relatively intelligent to sell to those that make their living in real estate.
To the average idiot that doesn't know anything more than House = American Dream, the blind leading the blind works quite well.
it's the nature of thing. hope springs eternal and all that.
Got to love that "censorship doesn't exist" except for when you put the setting on saying that your posts have to approved before being posted.
If anything, I would say without really knowing for certain that Sark would never even know about, much less touch, some of the kids that Petersen will recruit regardless of where they might come from.
If there's a problem, shoot us a PM, although a few of you seem bent on twisting stuff.
brb
blondeanal beads, vibrator, Dawgnews and Fetters trainWe'll he did. I think the more interesting question would be.....why?
But you don't know the answer to that. Nobody does not named Chris Petersen.
The entire discussion has centered around Petersen not taking the guys that Sark did ... and we know that the company line is that Sark and staff were great recruiters (let's not let facts like 4-5, 5-4, 5-4, 5-4, and 5-4 OR his record in games where he trailed at halftime get in the way) and that if Sark would have stayed that he would have landed a MONSTER class this year. The idea being pushed is that Petersen wouldn't have recruited the guys that Sark would have (read Petersen might not be able to deliver said MONSTER class) and that since the roster consists of plenty of guys that Sark recruited that have an "edge" (btw, most football players have that), there's going to be a massive problem with this "culture shift."
Yet, when countered with a guy that unquestionably has more character flaws than the example presented and that player WAS on Petersen's team, there's no possible comeback. NONE.