NOAA Data Confirms July Was Hottest Month Ever Recorded
United States government scientists on Thursday confirmed that July was the hottest month on record, edging out the previous record-holder, July 2016.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that the global average temperature last month was 62.1 degrees Fahrenheit (16.7 degrees Celsius). That is 0.05 degree Fahrenheit higher than July 2016, and 1.7 degrees higher than the average for the 20th century.
Comments
-
Summer hater.
-
Every month
11 years to go
Thankfully -
This is a posted story, the negative interpretation of it belongs to your mind not the story or its messenger.PurpleThrobber said:Summer hater.
-
The Throbber is hot as ballz.Gwad said:
This is a posted story, the negative interpretation of it belongs to your mind not the story or its messenger.PurpleThrobber said:Summer hater.
So whether July was warm is irrelevant.
-
But 2005.
-
Ah yes...the “global temperature” with shite data because the historical US data says it is nowhere close.Gwad said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/climate/hottest-july-noaa.html
United States government scientists on Thursday confirmed that July was the hottest month on record, edging out the previous record-holder, July 2016.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that the global average temperature last month was 62.1 degrees Fahrenheit (16.7 degrees Celsius). That is 0.05 degree Fahrenheit higher than July 2016, and 1.7 degrees higher than the average for the 20th century.
11 years until we are at 12 years to live version 6...this time we’re serious. -
The story is bullshit. The theory is bullshit. Therefore the poster is bullshit.Gwad said:
This is a posted story, the negative interpretation of it belongs to your mind not the story or its messenger.PurpleThrobber said:Summer hater.
-
Have the Obama's weighed in yet?
-
I love how you think the original quote needs embellishing so you just lie about it. Repeatedly.HoustonHusky said:
Ah yes...the “global temperature” with shite data because the historical US data says it is nowhere close.Gwad said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/climate/hottest-july-noaa.html
United States government scientists on Thursday confirmed that July was the hottest month on record, edging out the previous record-holder, July 2016.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that the global average temperature last month was 62.1 degrees Fahrenheit (16.7 degrees Celsius). That is 0.05 degree Fahrenheit higher than July 2016, and 1.7 degrees higher than the average for the 20th century.
11 years until we are at 12 years to live version 6...this time we’re serious. -
What the fuck is this 11 years bullshit anyways? Something some blowhard said? Would make sense because only blowhards care about what other blowhards have said.
-
Another one proud of his ignoranceGwad said:What the fuck is this 11 years bullshit anyways? Something some blowhard said? Would make sense because only blowhards care about what other blowhards have said.
You guys wear it well -
My July was rainy af. You can fuck off.
-
July US temperatures were at/below the mean for average for the last 100 years. Simple fact.
They don't like this fact, so they generate a "global" temperature that is basically hot in places they either don't have data so they use models to assume it was hot or have shitty data and use that to feed their religion. Go look into their "data"...they claim record heat in central Africa, but they literally have NO historical data points to know. None. Same in central parts of Australia, same in several other places.
It is made up. Its a religion. And none of it is backed up by Lower Troposphere data.
Add to that much of the historical data that is anything but scientific. They don't like it, they "adjust it". They will have a shitty site that used to be rural and now its on a heat island because everything around it is paved...it will show "heating", but the 4 other stations closest to it won't. How do they "fix" that problem? Average them together...its nuts. One simple example of this is Argentina for anyone that wants to dig into the data. Its nuts.
Carry on HondoFS and HondoFSbros...we only have 11 more years to live until that prediction fails miserably, but I'm sure the NEXT prediction of our demise will be serious. Really. Promise.
-
Yes I trust the information from the dude who thinks someone said we were all going to die in 11 years. Nice rant otherwise. Even if you are full of shit, you have conviction so there's that.HoustonHusky said:July US temperatures were at/below the mean for average for the last 100 years. Simple fact.
They don't like this fact, so they generate a "global" temperature that is basically hot in places they either don't have data so they use models to assume it was hot or have shitty data and use that to feed their religion. Go look into their "data"...they claim record heat in central Africa, but they literally have NO historical data points to know. None. Same in central parts of Australia, same in several other places.
It is made up. Its a religion. And none of it is backed up by Lower Troposphere data.
Add to that much of the historical data that is anything but scientific. They don't like it, they "adjust it". They will have a shitty site that used to be rural and now its on a heat island because everything around it is paved...it will show "heating", but the 4 other stations closest to it won't. How do they "fix" that problem? Average them together...its nuts. One simple example of this is Argentina for anyone that wants to dig into the data. Its nuts.
Carry on HondoFS and HondoFSbros...we only have 11 more years to live until that prediction fails miserably, but I'm sure the NEXT prediction of our demise will be serious. Really. Promise. -
The NOAA relies on 6 weather stations in Georgia. One is smack dab at the worlds busiest airport right off a runway in between a major highway. It has been brought up locally but there was no answer. What fucking idiot would put a weather station where there is black top surrounding it? Not to mention the heated exhaust and jet blast it measures? Seriously. Guess where the weather station is in Macon GA? Yep you guessed it, at the airport right off the black top. Augusta? Airport.HoustonHusky said:July US temperatures were at/below the mean for average for the last 100 years. Simple fact.
They don't like this fact, so they generate a "global" temperature that is basically hot in places they either don't have data so they use models to assume it was hot or have shitty data and use that to feed their religion. Go look into their "data"...they claim record heat in central Africa, but they literally have NO historical data points to know. None. Same in central parts of Australia, same in several other places.
It is made up. Its a religion. And none of it is backed up by Lower Troposphere data.
Add to that much of the historical data that is anything but scientific. They don't like it, they "adjust it". They will have a shitty site that used to be rural and now its on a heat island because everything around it is paved...it will show "heating", but the 4 other stations closest to it won't. How do they "fix" that problem? Average them together...its nuts. One simple example of this is Argentina for anyone that wants to dig into the data. Its nuts.
Carry on HondoFS and HondoFSbros...we only have 11 more years to live until that prediction fails miserably, but I'm sure the NEXT prediction of our demise will be serious. Really. Promise.
Now I know you libs like to predict our demise, somehow that feeds your narcissism, but this is some pretty common sense stuff. I mean there are acres of forested land in GA that would be perfect for weather stations only they don't seem to like putting them there. In fact there are no NOAA weather stations in the mountains or plains of GA.
The best indication that there is just complete ineptness and dishonesty in the NOAA was 5 years ago when they shut down 600 out of 9000 weather stations across the USA. The 600 were a joke. In the worst places and in total disrepair that skewed the measurements so badly that I find it hard to believe a 3rd graders would locate them where they did. One was right next to an ancient steam generating factory with the temperature station getting pelted with steam exhaust. You knew it was a scam when the NOAA said that those 600 sites weren't skewing the data and that they took care of the skewed data by using statistics to even them all out. They were just lying through their teeth.
It was a couple of years after this dishonest and corrupt behavior by the NOAA that the world renowned climatologist and Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric sciences at GA Tech (Judith Curry) resigned. She couldn't take the lies and lack of real science. What a disgrace the "scientific" community is. Claiming that 600 horrendous weather stations didn't affect the statistics is just so dishonest and ridiculous. -
She said 122001400ex said:
Yes I trust the information from the dude who thinks someone said we were all going to die in 11 years. Nice rant otherwise. Even if you are full of shit, you have conviction so there's that.HoustonHusky said:July US temperatures were at/below the mean for average for the last 100 years. Simple fact.
They don't like this fact, so they generate a "global" temperature that is basically hot in places they either don't have data so they use models to assume it was hot or have shitty data and use that to feed their religion. Go look into their "data"...they claim record heat in central Africa, but they literally have NO historical data points to know. None. Same in central parts of Australia, same in several other places.
It is made up. Its a religion. And none of it is backed up by Lower Troposphere data.
Add to that much of the historical data that is anything but scientific. They don't like it, they "adjust it". They will have a shitty site that used to be rural and now its on a heat island because everything around it is paved...it will show "heating", but the 4 other stations closest to it won't. How do they "fix" that problem? Average them together...its nuts. One simple example of this is Argentina for anyone that wants to dig into the data. Its nuts.
Carry on HondoFS and HondoFSbros...we only have 11 more years to live until that prediction fails miserably, but I'm sure the NEXT prediction of our demise will be serious. Really. Promise.
A year ago
Why do you feel the need to lie about it?
-
LOL at worrying about the climate. This shit is over soon.
-
Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
-
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass. -
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that.
-
Private sector scientists have been clear that global warming exists and is related to their actions. Did you miss the article on Exxon in the 80s?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that. -
And to wherever the money that pays their salaries flows from!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass. -
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
Private sector scientists have been clear that global warming exists and is related to their actions. Did you miss the article on Exxon in the 80s?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that.
Fucking A.
-
So you are telling me scientists at Exxon are lying and skewing the data to make their actions worse? For reals?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
Private sector scientists have been clear that global warming exists and is related to their actions. Did you miss the article on Exxon in the 80s?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that.
Fucking A. -
But the multiple examples of paid climatologists and gubment supported organizations like the NOAA that are lying and skewing data doesn't register with you. Did I get that about right?2001400ex said:
So you are telling me scientists at Exxon are lying and skewing the data to make their actions worse? For reals?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
Private sector scientists have been clear that global warming exists and is related to their actions. Did you miss the article on Exxon in the 80s?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that.
Fucking A. -
No, you're telling yourself that.2001400ex said:
So you are telling me scientists at Exxon are lying and skewing the data to make their actions worse? For reals?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
Private sector scientists have been clear that global warming exists and is related to their actions. Did you miss the article on Exxon in the 80s?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that.
Fucking A.
At least be intellectually honest enough to acknowledge people lie and slant their bias for their own self benefit. Fuck. If it doesn't match the party line, are you seriously that entrenched in the extremist progressive cult or what?
If that's the case, at least jump on the couch like Tom Cruise.
-
They have been caught cooking the books. excluding data that doesn't fit their desired outcome etc. Everyone knows this. Nothing they say can be trusted as they only get paid to say that global warming exists.
-
What is the motivation for the scientists at Exxon to make the prosecutors case for them?PurpleThrobber said:
No, you're telling yourself that.2001400ex said:
So you are telling me scientists at Exxon are lying and skewing the data to make their actions worse? For reals?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
Private sector scientists have been clear that global warming exists and is related to their actions. Did you miss the article on Exxon in the 80s?PurpleThrobber said:
What part of "both the gubmint sector and private sector lie like motherfuckers' is that difficult to understand?2001400ex said:
So the only scientists that say global warming is real are ones who work for the government in the US. Ok!PurpleThrobber said:Michael Lewis had a pretty sizeable section on the National Weather Service and NOAA in his most recent book.
It's a big money business. Both the gubmint sector and the private sector lie like motherfuckers.
Do gubmint officials and scientists slant their behaviors toward whatever administration/political winds are flowing? You bet your damned ass.
Jesus, Hondo. Soros should pull your shilling commission payment for shit like that.
Fucking A.
At least be intellectually honest enough to acknowledge people lie and slant their bias for their own self benefit. Fuck. If it doesn't match the party line, are you seriously that entrenched in the extremist progressive cult or what?
If that's the case, at least jump on the couch like Tom Cruise. -
Not here. Not even close. Mildest summer I can remember in the PNW. Fire season has been negligible.Gwad said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/climate/hottest-july-noaa.html
United States government scientists on Thursday confirmed that July was the hottest month on record, edging out the previous record-holder, July 2016.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that the global average temperature last month was 62.1 degrees Fahrenheit (16.7 degrees Celsius). That is 0.05 degree Fahrenheit higher than July 2016, and 1.7 degrees higher than the average for the 20th century. -
Been damn near perfect Warshington summer. Mostly warm, never hot.creepycoug said:
Not here. Not even close. Mildest summer I can remember in the PNW. Fire season has been negligible.Gwad said:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/15/climate/hottest-july-noaa.html
United States government scientists on Thursday confirmed that July was the hottest month on record, edging out the previous record-holder, July 2016.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced that the global average temperature last month was 62.1 degrees Fahrenheit (16.7 degrees Celsius). That is 0.05 degree Fahrenheit higher than July 2016, and 1.7 degrees higher than the average for the 20th century.
