Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Husky Jacks open thread [2019]
Comments
-
POTDWilburHooksHands said:
Jimmy Lake never had to face a ranked UW QBDoogCourics said:GrundleStiltzkin said:
In stride more than 10 yards downfield. That's nice.Neighbor2972 said:
To be fair, they haven’t had to face in practice before.dnc said: -
Even I thought he was holding out of the game, then I rewatched the Utah game and he got absolutely rolled on during a safety blitz. Really bad.Gladstone said:
Except he was truly injured. He warmed up and tried to go and couldn't. Stop the hate. If you rewatch you can even see the moment he got hurt in the Utah championship game. Rapp was a huge part of the rebirth.chuck said:
Me too, but then I can't help clicking on articles that mention his camp and preseason performance. Unsurprisingly they're all raving about him. Fucking guy is/was so good. He would've been a big difference in that game and deserves at least some of the derision he's gotten from husky fans.Houhusky said:
Who?RaceBannon said:
This is the real reason I'm so hard on RappDoogles said:
I think Ohio State scored another touchdown.GreenRiverGatorz said:
I think Cam and Myles are just that good.Houhusky said:
No McKinney?GrundleStiltzkin said:
McKinney sucks, injured, or Byrant, Molden, and Williams are that good?
Safety play might be a bit of a struggle if we cant get a pass rush at all like last year.
His replacement sucked so bad it was painful
Fucker is dead to me, nothing personal, just a bidness decision. -
-
-
-
Not Keith's fault. He isn't used to a QBs that can deliver that far downfielddnc said:Looks like @Bedroom_Russ is Team Fuller!
-
-
that's fucking funny ... and depressing at the same time.
The whole idea that playing football in a phone booth under brownsocks ... now playing with more functional space with eason ... amazing.
imagine that. wide receivers that can actually run forward and not have to curl back to the ball. space, space, space.
it even makes gaskin's achievements even more incredible ... think what he could have gained with eason under center and a much more wide open offense. we might be talking about gaskin being the best receiving rb at uw ever. -
-
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking. -
Dude u r parents don’t love you
-
I'd be thrilled if somebody beat Fuller out because that means we have somebody even better than the guy who is going to play in the league.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking. -
Adding some context to what you're saying would probably help. If you look at career college stats you can make the argument that Fuller has certainly had a similar career arc to Baldwin up until this point. Baldwins senior year in 13 games he had 58 receptions for 857 and 9 tds. Baldwin was injured his Junior year and only played 7 games and Andrew Luck was a Freshman. Fuller in his junior year in 14 games had 58 receptions for 874 and 4 tds. One had Andrew Luck throwing to him, the other had Jake Browning. Baldwin was Luck's #1 receiver in 2010, just like Fuller was last season for Browning. For further context Browning went 252/388 while Luck went 263/372. Similar volume, less efficiency.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking.
Insert Junior Adams and Jacob Eason. If Adams is as good of a developer as he's touted, then you can assume or hope that sharper routes are being run, and more of an attack the ball mentality that hes been preaching all fall camp. If Eason ends up being what everyone expects him to be and can make the proper reads and get the ball out with better timing and pace, I don't see why you wouldn't expect Fuller and the rest of the JAG recievers to also improve. If Fuller is our #1 I would expect him to have a better Senior year than Baldwin did tbh. -
He had twice the yards of anyone else on Stanford his senior year. It was a mistake by the whole league that he want drafted. Harbaugh didn’t give him a good recommendation either. If Fuller is Baldwin, that’s great.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking. -
The HAWKS did pretty good with Stanford guys. You could say that they don't win a SB without them. Also Kearse from the Pac 12
We? don't suck after all! -
Take this shit to the Seahulk Boored
-
-
Fuck off doog. We want future 1st and 2nd round picks at WR like Ross and Dante. Not late round picks or UDFA who are basic for us but manage to make an NFL roster by the skin of their teeth because they get better and are heady and use crafty WR tricks of the trade to make plays and are cheap for GM's to sign. After all those plays Baldwin made for the Hawks, he was still paid chump change compared to the top receivers in the league. His greatest value was that he was easy to keep on the roster because of his low cap hit whereas guys like Golden Tate and Paul Richardson had higher market values and got PAID. I'm not rooting against Fuller. I want him to have a big season but obviously we want more talented guys as our go-to receivers.dnc said:
I'd be thrilled if somebody beat Fuller out because that means we have somebody even better than the guy who is going to play in the league.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking. -
-
It wasn't a mistake. Most small guys that aren't fast don't make it. The league was right to assume he was one of those guys who couldn't make it. He defied the odds. I see we got some bleeding heart 12's in here as well as bleeding heart doogs. The season being right around the corner has those doog juices flowing.RoadDawg55 said:
He had twice the yards of anyone else on Stanford his senior year. It was a mistake by the whole league that he want drafted. Harbaugh didn’t give him a good recommendation either. If Fuller is Baldwin, that’s great.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking.
-
Pete Carroll for once gets it
-
Golden Tate 4 years $37.5 millionStrongArmCobra said:
Fuck off doog. We want future 1st and 2nd round picks at WR like Ross and Dante. Not late round picks or UDFA who are basic for us but manage to make an NFL roster by the skin of their teeth because they get better and are heady and use crafty WR tricks of the trade to make plays and are cheap for GM's to sign. After all those plays Baldwin made for the Hawks, he was still paid chump change compared to the top receivers in the league. His greatest value was that he was easy to keep on the roster because of his low cap hit whereas guys like Golden Tate and Paul Richardson had higher market values and got PAID. I'm not rooting against Fuller. I want him to have a big season but obviously we want more talented guys as our go-to receivers.dnc said:
I'd be thrilled if somebody beat Fuller out because that means we have somebody even better than the guy who is going to play in the league.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking.
Paul Richardson 5 years $40 million
Doug Baldwin 4 years $46 million
-
No shit. Of course we liked John Ross better than Fuller. That doesn’t mean Fuller isn’t good. Fuller could play for any UW team.StrongArmCobra said:
Fuck off doog. We want future 1st and 2nd round picks at WR like Ross and Dante. Not late round picks or UDFA who are basic for us but manage to make an NFL roster by the skin of their teeth because they get better and are heady and use crafty WR tricks of the trade to make plays and are cheap for GM's to sign. After all those plays Baldwin made for the Hawks, he was still paid chump change compared to the top receivers in the league. His greatest value was that he was easy to keep on the roster because of his low cap hit whereas guys like Golden Tate and Paul Richardson had higher market values and got PAID. I'm not rooting against Fuller. I want him to have a big season but obviously we want more talented guys as our go-to receivers.dnc said:
I'd be thrilled if somebody beat Fuller out because that means we have somebody even better than the guy who is going to play in the league.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking. -
Doug Baldwin lead the league in TD receptions in 2015. Only in Ballz world is a Doug Baldwin comparison a bad thing.
-
WE WANT PLAYERS LIKE JOHN ROSSRoadDawg55 said:
No shit. Of course we liked John Ross better than Fuller. That doesn’t mean Fuller isn’t good. Fuller could play for any UW team.StrongArmCobra said:
Fuck off doog. We want future 1st and 2nd round picks at WR like Ross and Dante. Not late round picks or UDFA who are basic for us but manage to make an NFL roster by the skin of their teeth because they get better and are heady and use crafty WR tricks of the trade to make plays and are cheap for GM's to sign. After all those plays Baldwin made for the Hawks, he was still paid chump change compared to the top receivers in the league. His greatest value was that he was easy to keep on the roster because of his low cap hit whereas guys like Golden Tate and Paul Richardson had higher market values and got PAID. I'm not rooting against Fuller. I want him to have a big season but obviously we want more talented guys as our go-to receivers.dnc said:
I'd be thrilled if somebody beat Fuller out because that means we have somebody even better than the guy who is going to play in the league.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking. -
I may be a day late and a dollar short with this observation, but that looked like 40+ yards in the air and Eason barely had to flick his wrist to get it out there in stride. I'm weeping.GrundleStiltzkin said:
In stride more than 10 yards downfield. That's nice.Neighbor2972 said: -
Prefacing this by saying I don't care about the Seahawks and couldn't care less about Doug Baldwin. That said:StrongArmCobra said:
It wasn't a mistake. Most small guys that aren't fast don't make it. The league was right to assume he was one of those guys who couldn't make it. He defied the odds. I see we got some bleeding heart 12's in here as well as bleeding heart doogs. The season being right around the corner has those doog juices flowing.RoadDawg55 said:
He had twice the yards of anyone else on Stanford his senior year. It was a mistake by the whole league that he want drafted. Harbaugh didn’t give him a good recommendation either. If Fuller is Baldwin, that’s great.StrongArmCobra said:
That's kind of the point. He was average in college so nobody knew who he was. It's a fair comparison for Fuller. Stop pretending you think Fuller is really good and you have his back because he's one of our guys you bleeding heart doog. You don't, because he hasn't proven it yet. Most here would prefer it if Terrell Bynum or Puka Nacua beat Fuller out. I doubt you're any different.dnc said:
You didn't even know who Doug Baldwin was in college. Your analysis is "he didn't get drafted so he must not have been good".StrongArmCobra said:
Don't blame me for your misunderstanding. The point is Fuller is 5'10 and 185 pounds and he's not fast, just like Baldwin. He has to win by being smarter, super skilled, crafty, and a try hard, just like Baldwin. Baldwin went undrafted and then became a Cinderella story of a less talented, try hard guy making it in the NFL. For every Doug Baldwin, there are a hundred other JAG talent level slot receivers who didn't make it. I'm obviously not saying Fuller is what Doug Baldwin became in the NFL. He's a college Doug Baldwin kind of guy and if he's our #1 guy at WR, that's not good enough.bigcc said:
That's a stupid fucking comparison then if you don't point that out beforehandStrongArmCobra said:
Jesus Christ. He also went undrafted for a reason. Fuller = Doug Baldwin IN COLLEGE!WilburHooksHands said:
Never seen so many people tripping over their own dicks in a thread. Doug Baldwin was a pro bowler.StrongArmCobra said:
He's Doug Baldwin 2.0. He doesn't suck but talent wise he's average in every way and if he's your #1 guy that means your WR corps sucks. It's gonna be a midget show at receiver this year. Fuller, Baccellia, and McClatcher. 5'10, 5'10, and 5'8. Please for the love of god somebody over 6'0 tall be good. Jones? Osborne? Puka? Anybody?dnc said:
Just stop talking.
https://www.fieldgulls.com/2012/2/22/2816749/nfl-combine-seattle-seahawks-past-resultsDoug Baldwin
Not invited to Combine. At his Stanford Pro Day, 5'9", 189 lbs. Ran a 4.47-4.49 in the 40, 37" Vert, 10'3" Broad, 4.26 in the shuttle, 6.65 in the 3-Cone and reportedly 6 reps of 225 lbs.
With those numbers, Baldwin would have been faster than first round picks Jonathan Baldwin and A.J. Green. Of course, Green is seven inches taller than D. Baldwin, much stronger, and (in my opinion) the best young WR in the NFL. Still, only a handful of WRs were fasted than 4.47.
Baldwin on Pro Day:
If he really did 6 reps of 225, Baldwin would have finished 2nd to last among WRs. His Vert would be in the upper-third and his Broad would rank somewhere in the middle. (Julio Jones ran a 4.39 and the best Broad of 11'3")
His shuttle speed would be considered slow but his 3-Cone would be fast.
If Baldwin goes to the Combine, I can't see any way in which he'd be undrafted when you consider his ability to catch a pass, his deceptive speed, and quick 3-Cone times. Even if he's doing less reps than me! (/writer pretends he can do one rep of 100 lbs.) -
Kalepo is improving
-
We need to hold the fucking bags like beating Bama, Penn State, and Ohio State depend on the fucking outcome!
-
Boom!RaceBannon said:Kalepo is improving
https://youtu.be/WMPoIzqlCQY
