Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Mornin' Doogs
Comments
-
Wasn't me, not how I get down. Was probably Carl.dnc said:
Sounds like someone was pushed down the Autzen steps in his wheelchair.WestCoastBiased said:
No. Its not.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The game is in Eugene. hthGladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
Sad! -
This is you first poast????WestCoastBiased said:
No. Its not.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The game is in Eugene. hthGladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium -
A faulty generalization is a conclusion about all or many instances of a phenomenon that has been reached on the basis of just one or just a few instances of that phenomenon. It is an example of the Singular Data Point Fallacy. For example, we may generalize about all people, or all members of a group, based on what we know about just one or just a few people. If we meet an angry person from a given country X, we may suspect that most people in country X are often angry. If our team defeats a conference champion, we may suspect that our team is of a similar quality to the conference champion. Faulty generalizations may lead to further incorrect conclusions. We may, for example, conclude that citizens of country X are genetically inferior, or that poverty is generally the fault of the poor.OwenTooelve said:
32/86 looks even worse if we omit the game he won against Pete.Gladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
Expressed in more precise philosophical language, the Singular Data Point Fallacy is a conclusion that has been made on the basis of weak premises. Unlike fallacies of relevance, the premises are related to the conclusions yet only weakly buttress the conclusions. A faulty generalization is thus produced. This inductive fallacy is any of several errors of inductive inference and is often taught at Freshman Philosophy 101 or Intro to Business courses.
-
Gladstone said:
A faulty generalization is a conclusion about all or many instances of a phenomenon that has been reached on the basis of just one or just a few instances of that phenomenon. It is an example of the Singular Data Point Fallacy. For example, we may generalize about all people, or all members of a group, based on what we know about just one or just a few people. If we meet an angry person from a given country X, we may suspect that most people in country X are often angry. If our team defeats a conference champion, we may suspect that our team is of a similar quality to the conference champion. Faulty generalizations may lead to further incorrect conclusions. We may, for example, conclude that citizens of country X are genetically inferior, or that poverty is generally the fault of the poor.OwenTooelve said:
32/86 looks even worse if we omit the game he won against Pete.Gladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
Expressed in more precise philosophical language, the Singular Data Point Fallacy is a conclusion that has been made on the basis of weak premises. Unlike fallacies of relevance, the premises are related to the conclusions yet only weakly buttress the conclusions. A faulty generalization is thus produced. This inductive fallacy is any of several errors of inductive inference and is often taught at Freshman Philosophy 101 or Intro to Business courses.
-
Gladstone said:
A faulty generalization is a conclusion about all or many instances of a phenomenon that has been reached on the basis of just one or just a few instances of that phenomenon. It is an example of the Singular Data Point Fallacy. For example, we may generalize about all people, or all members of a group, based on what we know about just one or just a few people. If we meet an angry person from a given country X, we may suspect that most people in country X are often angry. If our team defeats a conference champion, we may suspect that our team is of a similar quality to the conference champion. Faulty generalizations may lead to further incorrect conclusions. We may, for example, conclude that citizens of country X are genetically inferior, or that poverty is generally the fault of the poor.OwenTooelve said:
32/86 looks even worse if we omit the game he won against Pete.Gladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
Expressed in more precise philosophical language, the Singular Data Point Fallacy is a conclusion that has been made on the basis of weak premises. Unlike fallacies of relevance, the premises are related to the conclusions yet only weakly buttress the conclusions. A faulty generalization is thus produced. This inductive fallacy is any of several errors of inductive inference and is often taught at Freshman Philosophy 101 or Intro to Business courses.
"This is why I fucking hate Hardcore Husky"
-- Abraham Lincoln -
5th step? You need more AA meetings you alcoholic! Stay
-
This sounds a lot like confirmation bias or something.Gladstone said:
A faulty generalization is a conclusion about all or many instances of a phenomenon that has been reached on the basis of just one or just a few instances of that phenomenon. It is an example of the Singular Data Point Fallacy. For example, we may generalize about all people, or all members of a group, based on what we know about just one or just a few people. If we meet an angry person from a given country X, we may suspect that most people in country X are often angry. If our team defeats a conference champion, we may suspect that our team is of a similar quality to the conference champion. Faulty generalizations may lead to further incorrect conclusions. We may, for example, conclude that citizens of country X are genetically inferior, or that poverty is generally the fault of the poor.OwenTooelve said:
32/86 looks even worse if we omit the game he won against Pete.Gladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
Expressed in more precise philosophical language, the Singular Data Point Fallacy is a conclusion that has been made on the basis of weak premises. Unlike fallacies of relevance, the premises are related to the conclusions yet only weakly buttress the conclusions. A faulty generalization is thus produced. This inductive fallacy is any of several errors of inductive inference and is often taught at Freshman Philosophy 101 or Intro to Business courses. -
Imagine this being your first post on HH.WestCoastBiased said:
No. Its not.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The game is in Eugene. hthGladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium -
WestCoastBiased said:
No. Its not.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The game is in Eugene. hthGladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
-
go on...dnc said:
Sounds like someone was pushed down the Autzen steps in his wheelchair.WestCoastBiased said:
No. Its not.GrundleStiltzkin said:
The game is in Eugene. hthGladstone said:what's on 10/19
oh lol
yes we're all fearing mario 'i've won 33 games in 87 tries as HC' cristobal's dudebrah army invading husky stadium
Sad!
