They are no longer pretending.
Comments
-
Chirp Chirp motherfucker.GrundleStiltzkin said:
His antipathy towards the sage grouse is well documented.UW_Doog_Bot said:
You are trying to say that there's a massive failing of internet service provided to one of the most developed and accessible markets in the world despite huge geographic challenges.GDS said:
Is this where I call you a dumbfuck for being unable to understand the Microsoft report?SFGbob said:
Fine you're stupid enough to believe that there are 160 million people living in the non-red areas of the map I posted.GDS said:
Because Verizon cell coverage is equivalent to 25 mbps min terrestrial based broadband...really flailing here Blob. Sad.SFGbob said:
Scotty the dumbfuck thinks there are a 160 million people living in those non-purple areas.HustlinOwl said:
Then you double down by saying the government is going to be the one to fix it with what will soon be obsolete tech.
You probably are an advocate for returning to government run markets for airfare as well. StatistFS. -
Would this be a good tim to fire up the septic debate between flea and buffer?RaceBannon said:
Good questionGDS said:
Why run power lines and water and roads out there...broadband should be treated like a public utility as it becoming just as essential.RaceBannon said:If they can but they don't then it doesn't make business sense
But a commie wouldn't have a grasp of that
Live off the grid with solar and a well
-
I think the Federal government should create a Federal program to provide everyone with a septic tank access to a Federally financed public sewer system.creepycoug said:
Would this be a good tim to fire up the septic debate between flea and buffer?RaceBannon said:
Good questionGDS said:
Why run power lines and water and roads out there...broadband should be treated like a public utility as it becoming just as essential.RaceBannon said:If they can but they don't then it doesn't make business sense
But a commie wouldn't have a grasp of that
Live off the grid with solar and a well -
Cost over return. Running cables miles to service one or two houses is cost prohibitive. I shouldn't pay for it. I'm rural I use microwave. Works very well.GDS said:
Why run power lines and water and roads out there...broadband should be treated like a public utility as it becoming just as essential.RaceBannon said:If they can but they don't then it doesn't make business sense
But a commie wouldn't have a grasp of that -
Don't dredge that bullshit upcreepycoug said:
Would this be a good tim to fire up the septic debate between flea and buffer?RaceBannon said:
Good questionGDS said:
Why run power lines and water and roads out there...broadband should be treated like a public utility as it becoming just as essential.RaceBannon said:If they can but they don't then it doesn't make business sense
But a commie wouldn't have a grasp of that
Live off the grid with solar and a well
See what I did there. -
Would have been better you'd just said "shit."Pitchfork51 said:
Don't dredge that bullshit upcreepycoug said:
Would this be a good tim to fire up the septic debate between flea and buffer?RaceBannon said:
Good questionGDS said:
Why run power lines and water and roads out there...broadband should be treated like a public utility as it becoming just as essential.RaceBannon said:If they can but they don't then it doesn't make business sense
But a commie wouldn't have a grasp of that
Live off the grid with solar and a well
See what I did there. -
Jesus christ.
That's "Old" 4G technology. I want the fast most sweetest almost-live porn, lapdance dollars at hand streaming connectivity possible. If driverless trucks are going to be racing across the plains, I sure as fuck want to know there's no some buffering lag....
-
Here's a man who knows how to sellPurpleThrobber said:Jesus christ.
That's "Old" 4G technology. I want the fast most sweetest almost-live porn, lapdance dollars at hand streaming connectivity possible. If driverless trucks are going to be racing across the plains, I sure as fuck want to know there's no some buffering lag.... -
Wait til you hear about the haptics.PurpleThrobber said:Jesus christ.
That's "Old" 4G technology. I want the fast most sweetest almost-live porn, lapdance dollars at hand streaming connectivity possible. If driverless trucks are going to be racing across the plains, I sure as fuck want to know there's no some buffering lag.... -
Obviously Bob is trying to turn this into a gotcha moment and twisting definitions around to his favor. My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).GDS said:
Is this where I call you a dumbfuck for being unable to understand the Microsoft report?SFGbob said:
Fine you're stupid enough to believe that there are 160 million people living in the non-red areas of the map I posted.GDS said:
Because Verizon cell coverage is equivalent to 25 mbps min terrestrial based broadband...really flailing here Blob. Sad.SFGbob said:
Scotty the dumbfuck thinks there are a 160 million people living in those non-purple areas.HustlinOwl said: -
Obviously you didn't read who tried to twist the definitions around and are too much a of coward to contradict someone on your team. I didn't try to turn anything into a "gotcha." The dumbass claimed there are a 160 million people who don't have access to high speed internet. A claim that you, yourself have refuted. This isn't about me Owl.HustlinOwl said:
Obviously Bob is trying to turn this into a gotcha moment and twisting definitions around to his favor. My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).GDS said:
Is this where I call you a dumbfuck for being unable to understand the Microsoft report?SFGbob said:
Fine you're stupid enough to believe that there are 160 million people living in the non-red areas of the map I posted.GDS said:
Because Verizon cell coverage is equivalent to 25 mbps min terrestrial based broadband...really flailing here Blob. Sad.SFGbob said:
Scotty the dumbfuck thinks there are a 160 million people living in those non-purple areas.HustlinOwl said: -
He didn't refute it he said he didn't believe it was true,
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
-
Now you don't know the meaning of the word refute?SFGbob said:He didn't refute it he said he didn't believe it was true,
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
re·fute
/rəˈfyo͞ot/
Learn to pronounce
verb
prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
He said he didn't believe the number to be true then posted a map of Verizon cell signal coverage...you're really having a tough time today Blob. -
Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit. -
My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).GDS said:
Now you don't know the meaning of the word refute?SFGbob said:He didn't refute it he said he didn't believe it was true,
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
re·fute
/rəˈfyo͞ot/
Learn to pronounce
verb
prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
He said he didn't believe the number to be true then posted a map of Verizon cell signal coverage...you're really having a tough time today Blob.
Yeah, but he didn't "refute" you Scotty. -
Weird how I didn't lie about anything, while you lied claiming Owl had refuted my point with his Verizon 4G map showing 70% coverage in relation to a discussion about terrestrial land based broadband - sad to see you struggling so yugely.SFGbob said:Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit.
"Using anonymized data that we collect as part of our ongoing work to improve the performance and security of our software and services, we found that 162.8 million people are not using the internet at broadband speeds. Our results align well with the FCC’s broadband subscription data and the Pew Research numbers, which suggests these data sets are far closer to the mark then the broadband access data reported by the FCC and leaves us with the unescapable conclusion that today there exists no accurate, comprehensive and public estimate of broadband coverage in the United States." -
Nope he didn't - you're really melting down here Blob.SFGbob said:
My opinion is if you aren't completely off grid, living in a canyon or have a huge mountain close to your south you can get a reasonable form of Internet access(it may be spendy, but it's there).GDS said:
Now you don't know the meaning of the word refute?SFGbob said:He didn't refute it he said he didn't believe it was true,
Good to see this Kunt doesn't believe in twisting words.
He said it wasn't true, he posted an image in support of his claim and he has all but said you're full of shit. But he didn't "refute" it.
re·fute
/rəˈfyo͞ot/
Learn to pronounce
verb
prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.
He said he didn't believe the number to be true then posted a map of Verizon cell signal coverage...you're really having a tough time today Blob.
Yeah, but he didn't "refute" you Scotty. -
Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
-
uhhh no that's not what I said but your continued meltdown over this is pretty entertaining...SFGbob said:Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
-
Well you've said all kinds of lies and bullshit Scott. Maybe if you call it a "meltdown" again it will magically turn your lying bullshit into the truth.GDS said:
uhhh no that's not what I said but your continued meltdown over this is pretty entertaining...SFGbob said:Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
-
For some reason my earlier post got deleted but hell even the FCC report you posted which uses a completely faulty premise for determining "access" says the Report concludes broadband is not yet being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion
-
Which isn't the same as saying that 160 million people lack access to high speed internet but you keep fucking chicken Scotty.GDS said:For some reason my earlier post got deleted but hell even the FCC report you posted which uses a completely faulty premise for determining "access" says the Report concludes broadband is not yet being deployed in a reasonable and timely fashion
-
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.SFGbob said:Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit. -
Obviously you need a Federal program to provide you with greater internet speed.HustlinOwl said:
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.SFGbob said:Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit. -
The current established minimum speed for broadband is 25 mbps. The FCC talked about lowering the minimum threshold to 10 mbps but in the end stuck with the 25 mbps it's been since 2015 years.HustlinOwl said:
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.SFGbob said:Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit. -
Your argument is still shit.GDS said:
The current established minimum speed for broadband is 25 mbps. The FCC talked about lowering the minimum threshold to 10 mbps but in the end stuck with the 25 mbps it's been since 2015 years.HustlinOwl said:
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.SFGbob said:Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit. -
So people lack access to an internet speed that most people don't need. But hey, Scotty the Republican says we should spend Federal tax dollars on it. You know what else people in rural areas lack? They don't have good entertainment and shopping options. I demand a Federal program!!!!GDS said:
The current established minimum speed for broadband is 25 mbps. The FCC talked about lowering the minimum threshold to 10 mbps but in the end stuck with the 25 mbps it's been since 2015 years.HustlinOwl said:
I asked for a definition on Broadband and didn't get an answer. I can only get to 20Mbs where I live in rural Idaho. If 25Mbs is the definition I can see the number of people being very large without access. With 20 I can remote into work and have a couple people streaming netflix in different rooms without any problems(all while glued to phones doing social media stuff and not watching what they're streaming). Under that definition 160M still seems high, but I guess possible.SFGbob said:Weird how you lied about what Microsoft said Scott
160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband. In today’s economy with the skills people need to gain that’s absolutely a collective need and puts us behind other world powers. We need to improve our infrastructure and broadband is absolutely part of that.
Not using the internet at broadband speed and not having access to broadband speed aren't quite the same thing you fucking lying piece of shit. -
"all kinds" while you've yet to point out a single one. This is what I said 160 million Americans lack high speed terrestrial broadband and that is backed up by the Microsoft data posted here.SFGbob said:
Well you've said all kinds of lies and bullshit Scott. Maybe if you call it a "meltdown" again it will magically turn your lying bullshit into the truth.GDS said:
uhhh no that's not what I said but your continued meltdown over this is pretty entertaining...SFGbob said:Got it, so in the land of Scott the lying Kunt, if you're not using the internet at Broadband Speed then you don't have access to the internet at Broadband speed and we need to spend $80B in Federal dollars in order to provide people with a Broadband they have access to but don't currently use.
If we want to talk about bullshit and lies I could point to you claiming owl's map showing Verizon's 4G coverage being at 70% somehow refuted my point, but I don't want to interrupt your meltdown here... -
I claimed that Owl was trying to refute you with that map. You claimed that he wasn't trying to refute you. Just because Owl is moron doesn't mean he wasn't attempting to refute you. My image refuted you, put you're a fucking liar and you just soldier on.
-
no - you claimed owl refuted my point and i pointed out he didn't. Was he trying to refute it? Probably but that's not what you claimed. Should we keep going with this bullshit or are you just looking to get the last word in?SFGbob said:I claimed that Owl was trying to refute you with that map. You claimed that he wasn't trying to refute you. Just because Owl is moron doesn't mean he wasn't attempting to refute you. My image refuted you, put you're a fucking liar and you just soldier on.
