Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Looks like the Muellertards are getting scared

RaceBannon
RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
in Tug Tavern
Mueller's testimony would seem like a great way to explain to all of us how there really was collusion and obstruction since it is right there in the report according to the Muellertards. (Did you read the report!!!!!)

Alas the whole thing could be collapsing

https://foxnews.com/politics/mueller-house-testimony-pushed-back-a-week-to-july-24


Planning for former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's highly anticipated testimony was thrown into disarray Friday as multiple sources said the hearing was delayed amid a "breakdown in negotiations" -- yet others indicated it could still go forward next week as planned.

Internal talks over the structure of the hearings originally scheduled for July 17 have been heating up for days, with some members complaining they might not have enough time carved out to ask questions.

Sources said Friday morning the hearings will be pushed back to July 24. A senior source said there was a "breakdown in negotiations" to have Mueller appear.

Mueller was slated to testify in public before the Judiciary Committee for two hours or more, followed by another two hours-plus of testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in an open setting.

But some lawmakers complained this wouldn't give them enough time for questions.

And there were conflicting details over plans for a subsequent private session. One source told Fox News this week that the Democrats plan to have Mueller testify behind closed doors--yet it remained unclear whether Mueller himself would participate in that setting, or if his deputies would answer questions instead.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., has said that the closed-door session would only be with the special counsel’s staff, but House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., left the door open to the possibility that Mueller could testify privately as well. It also remains unclear whether the two committees would hold a joint closed-door session or two separate ones.



Nothing like transparency.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Heard Nadler say yesterday or the day before that they wanted to have Mueller appear so that he could tell the American people what was really in the report. The Report has been out now for 3 months and Nadler is still pushing the same bullshit that Scott was pushing here earlier this week that the public doesn't really know what's really in the report and that we just need to hear it one more time from Mueller before we realize that it says something that it really doesn't.

    You'll notice how Scott ghosted as soon as he was asked to cite or quote the sections he claimed were really in the report.

    If Mueller ever does testify he isn't going to answer any questions other than what's already stated in the report. He'll claim that he never looked into the origins of what prompted the investigation because he wasn't asked to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    They don't want the public to hear him say it was all fake and a paid plot by the communistdemocratic party and Hillary.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    Sledog said:

    They don't want the public to hear him say it was all fake and a paid plot by the communistdemocratic party and Hillary.

    Well unfortunately he isn't going to say that. He isn't even going to answer openly about when he determined that there was no collusion. He'll just say when he finished the investigation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Does anyone still care about this shit
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GreenRiverGatorz
    GreenRiverGatorz Member Posts: 10,165
    Pitchfork51 said:

    Does anyone still care about this shit

    No
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dude61
    Dude61 Member Posts: 1,254
    As always, the left is embarrassingly transparent. They know Horowitz doesn't want to release his report until they fully close the book on Mueller, who is the only thing shielding them from total exposure.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 37,864 Standard Supporter
    Dude61 said:

    As always, the left is embarrassingly transparent. They know Horowitz doesn't want to release his report until they fully close the book on Mueller, who is the only thing shielding them from total exposure.

    true and since this whole mess was conceived to cover up the theft of an election and spying it's going to get real for some lib criminals soon. Unfortunately we don't have the death penalty for treason anymore.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ramenduck
    ramenduck Member Posts: 734
    edited July 2019
    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    They don't want the public to hear him say it was all fake and a paid plot by the communistdemocratic party and Hillary.

    Well unfortunately he isn't going to say that. He isn't even going to answer openly about when he determined that there was no collusion. He'll just say when he finished the investigation.
    They want him to say that if he had the authority, he would have indicted the president, or that if DJT was a private citizen, he would have been indicted.

    I think he might say that or something similar, but it is more likely he declines comment.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    ramenduck said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    They don't want the public to hear him say it was all fake and a paid plot by the communistdemocratic party and Hillary.

    Well unfortunately he isn't going to say that. He isn't even going to answer openly about when he determined that there was no collusion. He'll just say when he finished the investigation.
    They want him to say that if he had the authority, he would have indicted the president, or that if DJT was a private citizen, he would have been indicted.

    I think he might say that or something similar, but it is more likely he declines comment.
    Agreed.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WestlinnDuck
    WestlinnDuck Member Posts: 17,633 Standard Supporter
    Mueller and the leftards problem is that they can't factually say what the obstruction was. Feel free to clarify. So, far none of you leftards haven't come close.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    WestlinnDuck said:

    Mueller and the leftards problem is that they can't factually say what the obstruction was. Feel free to clarify. So, far none of you leftards haven't come close.

    Trump talked about firing Mueller but then didn't do anything about it. Clearly obstruction.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 23,973
    SFGbob said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Mueller and the leftards problem is that they can't factually say what the obstruction was. Feel free to clarify. So, far none of you leftards haven't come close.

    Trump talked about firing Mueller but then didn't do anything about it. Clearly obstruction.
    Cuz his demand was refused by his staff. Not even an effective tyrant.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GDS
    GDS Member Posts: 1,470
    ramenduck said:

    SFGbob said:

    Sledog said:

    They don't want the public to hear him say it was all fake and a paid plot by the communistdemocratic party and Hillary.

    Well unfortunately he isn't going to say that. He isn't even going to answer openly about when he determined that there was no collusion. He'll just say when he finished the investigation.
    They want him to say that if he had the authority, he would have indicted the president, or that if DJT was a private citizen, he would have been indicted.

    I think he might say that or something similar, but it is more likely he declines comment.
    I agree that's what they want but I don't see him making that statement and frankly not sure he should. The hearing if it happens will be a big dud imo as he'll just decline to answer any question where the answer isn't already contained in the report.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
    H Husky wants to prosecute thought crimes
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    RaceBannon said:

    H Husky wants to prosecute thought crimes

    Well he is a mind reader.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    edited July 2019
    I'm mostly just hanging out at a bar because the big boobed accountant is on a warpath and I don't plan on getting caught in the middle
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    edited July 2019
    Fox News won’t cover the Mueller testimony live this week. How are Bubba and Lurlene going to see the deep state and the trump campaign spying exposed?

    Nothing like transparency.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,047 Standard Supporter
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    WestlinnDuck said:

    Mueller and the leftards problem is that they can't factually say what the obstruction was. Feel free to clarify. So, far none of you leftards haven't come close.

    Trump talked about firing Mueller but then didn't do anything about it. Clearly obstruction.
    Cuz his demand was refused by his staff. Not even an effective tyrant.
    Funny. So BO made all his own decisions. So he was responsible for spying on a Presidential campaign. Guns for drugs. Spying on Conservative journalists. NOT prosecuting Hillary and her bleaching of her computers and cell phones. Building cages for children at the border.

    Do you want me to go on HH? I think you need to reconsider your hypocrisy.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Bendintheriver
    Bendintheriver Member Posts: 7,047 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Fox News won’t cover the Mueller testimony live this week. How are Bubba and Lurlene going to see the deep state and the trump campaign spying exposed?

    Nothing like transparency.

    So you have a problem with what Conservative networks aren't covering LIVE?

    Ha ha ha.. The lib msm has a mile long list of the crap they don't report. Stuff that is damaging to the liberal agenda.

    Can you be a bigger hypocritical piece of shit?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,000
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Fox News won’t cover the Mueller testimony live this week. How are Bubba and Lurlene going to see the deep state and the trump campaign spying exposed?

    Nothing like transparency.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....somebody gets their fake news from MSNBC (or worse...DemocraticUnderground?)…

    CirrhosisoftheBrain achieving HondoFS levels of poasting now...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    HoustonHusky said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Fox News won’t cover the Mueller testimony live this week. How are Bubba and Lurlene going to see the deep state and the trump campaign spying exposed?

    Nothing like transparency.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....somebody gets their fake news from MSNBC (or worse...DemocraticUnderground?)…

    CirrhosisoftheBrain achieving HondoFS levels of poasting now...
    Meltdown. White nationalism in full retreat.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,347 Founders Club
    HoustonHusky said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Fox News won’t cover the Mueller testimony live this week. How are Bubba and Lurlene going to see the deep state and the trump campaign spying exposed?

    Nothing like transparency.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....somebody gets their fake news from MSNBC (or worse...DemocraticUnderground?)…

    CirrhosisoftheBrain achieving HondoFS levels of poasting now...
    Achieving? HondoFS is squarely in his wheelhouse.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    edited July 2019
    Im hearing Mueller is gonna take down drumpf this week

    Also hearing people still care about the Mueller report and haven't totally forgotten about the nothing burger months ago
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2019
    The fact that an unaccountable deep state attempted a coup and failed, and no one...... NOT 1 DAMN PERSON is behind bars, is all the proof we need that the deep state is still firmly in control of the country and Trump has done NOTHING to root them out. Time is ticking. How long does he need, 20 years? He's only got about 5 more max to get it done. He might only have 1 more year. The way things have been going, I'm giving him about a .1 % chance of success in destroying the deep state totalitarians.

    What is option B?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,535 Founders Club
    edited July 2019
    someone is going to turn up dead or missing.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,113 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Fox News won’t cover the Mueller testimony live this week. How are Bubba and Lurlene going to see the deep state and the trump campaign spying exposed?

    Nothing like transparency.

    The muellertard falls for another fake

    How embarrassing




    Fox News will not only air the testimony, anchored by Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum, but its primetime lineup will provide a thorough analysis of the event as well.

    Reporters on both sides of the political spectrum quickly shot down Vance’s misinformation, but the MSNBC contributor claimed she was simply joking. Vance spent a large portion of Sunday defending her misinformation as "sarcasm" and "irony" before
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,183
    CuntWaffle said:



    What a stupid cunt lol
    She is lying.

    This is no different then when Hondo makes some bullshit claim and then backpedals and claims he was just trolling.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    RaceBannon said:

    Mueller's testimony would seem like a great way to explain to all of us how there really was collusion and obstruction since it is right there in the report according to the Muellertards. (Did you read the report!!!!!)

    Alas the whole thing could be collapsing

    https://foxnews.com/politics/mueller-house-testimony-pushed-back-a-week-to-july-24


    Planning for former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's highly anticipated testimony was thrown into disarray Friday as multiple sources said the hearing was delayed amid a "breakdown in negotiations" -- yet others indicated it could still go forward next week as planned.

    Internal talks over the structure of the hearings originally scheduled for July 17 have been heating up for days, with some members complaining they might not have enough time carved out to ask questions.

    Sources said Friday morning the hearings will be pushed back to July 24. A senior source said there was a "breakdown in negotiations" to have Mueller appear.

    Mueller was slated to testify in public before the Judiciary Committee for two hours or more, followed by another two hours-plus of testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in an open setting.

    But some lawmakers complained this wouldn't give them enough time for questions.

    And there were conflicting details over plans for a subsequent private session. One source told Fox News this week that the Democrats plan to have Mueller testify behind closed doors--yet it remained unclear whether Mueller himself would participate in that setting, or if his deputies would answer questions instead.

    House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., has said that the closed-door session would only be with the special counsel’s staff, but House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., left the door open to the possibility that Mueller could testify privately as well. It also remains unclear whether the two committees would hold a joint closed-door session or two separate ones.



    Nothing like transparency.

    @Sources true?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter