AOC tweet o’ the day
Comments
-
I won't read it but I agree with itMikeDamone said:
None of you retards will read it.YellowSnow said:MikeDamone said:
FDR was a piece of shit.allpurpleallgold said:
https://www.thenation.com/article/franklin-roosevelt-economic-bill-rights/YellowSnow said:What are "economis" rights exactly? Does any one citizen have a "right" to another's income? I believe that a certain amount of wealth redistribution in a modern, well functioning capitalist economy has benefits, but it's not an individual "right" outlined in the Constitution.
https://mises.org/sites/default/files/The Roosevelt Myth_2.pdf
If he hadn't started WW2 we? never would have got out of the depression using his policies
That's the myth.
We did need to do SOMETHING but the devil is always in the details -
I'll read this or mine a similar vein when time allows. @UW_Doog_Bot has had some good comments here previously on why the New Deal never got us back to full employment.MikeDamone said:
None of you retards will read it.YellowSnow said:MikeDamone said:
FDR was a piece of shit.allpurpleallgold said:
https://www.thenation.com/article/franklin-roosevelt-economic-bill-rights/YellowSnow said:What are "economis" rights exactly? Does any one citizen have a "right" to another's income? I believe that a certain amount of wealth redistribution in a modern, well functioning capitalist economy has benefits, but it's not an individual "right" outlined in the Constitution.
https://mises.org/sites/default/files/The Roosevelt Myth_2.pdf
None of this changes the fact that you're still a huge prick. -
They fact that I am a prick is independent of anything on this site.YellowSnow said:
I'll read this or mine a similar vein when time allows. @UW_Doog_Bot has had some good comments here previously on why the New Deal never got us back to full employment.MikeDamone said:
None of you retards will read it.YellowSnow said:MikeDamone said:
FDR was a piece of shit.allpurpleallgold said:
https://www.thenation.com/article/franklin-roosevelt-economic-bill-rights/YellowSnow said:What are "economis" rights exactly? Does any one citizen have a "right" to another's income? I believe that a certain amount of wealth redistribution in a modern, well functioning capitalist economy has benefits, but it's not an individual "right" outlined in the Constitution.
https://mises.org/sites/default/files/The Roosevelt Myth_2.pdf
None of this changes the fact that you're still a huge prick.
-
FDR prolonged the depression and packed the court over multiple terms with Lefties who supported his bullshit. I give him points for not being a Nazi apologist or isolationist and realizing the threat ze Germans were to the whole world. He's also the reason we had to initiate term limits for presidents after completely ignoring the precedent GW set. Typical socialist move to try and stay in power forever imo.YellowSnow said:
I'll read this or mine a similar vein when time allows. @UW_Doog_Bot has had some good comments here previously on why the New Deal never got us back to full employment.MikeDamone said:
None of you retards will read it.YellowSnow said:MikeDamone said:
FDR was a piece of shit.allpurpleallgold said:
https://www.thenation.com/article/franklin-roosevelt-economic-bill-rights/YellowSnow said:What are "economis" rights exactly? Does any one citizen have a "right" to another's income? I believe that a certain amount of wealth redistribution in a modern, well functioning capitalist economy has benefits, but it's not an individual "right" outlined in the Constitution.
https://mises.org/sites/default/files/The Roosevelt Myth_2.pdf
None of this changes the fact that you're still a huge prick.
Economis F-
Foreign Policy A-
Support of Democratic Chinstitutions D
-
U are a top 3 cuntMikeDamone said:
Bottom 3allpurpleallgold said:
He wasn’t perfect but he’s a top 3 president all time.MikeDamone said:
FDR was a piece of shit.allpurpleallgold said:
https://www.thenation.com/article/franklin-roosevelt-economic-bill-rights/YellowSnow said:What are "economis" rights exactly? Does any one citizen have a "right" to another's income? I believe that a certain amount of wealth redistribution in a modern, well functioning capitalist economy has benefits, but it's not an individual "right" outlined in the Constitution.
-
True and if he said she calls herself a democratic socialist, I wouldn’t have objected.dnc said:
She's a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.allpurpleallgold said:
She doesn’t call herself a socialist.RaceBannon said:MLK may or may not have been a socialist and the same FBI that the left cheered on against Trump did call him a communist
But AOC calls herself a socialist so what the fuck is she crying about now?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-explained-democratic-socialism-and-capitalism-at-sxsw/ar-BBUA7cd
“Capitalism, to me, is an ideology of capital. The most important thing is the concentration of capital and it means that we prioritize profit and the accumulation of money above all else and we seek it at any human and environmental cost. But when we talk about ideas like democratic socialism, it means putting democracy and society first, instead of capital first, it doesn’t mean that the actual concept of capitalistic society should be abolished.”
This is the argument Race wants to have. Because he thinks if you say the word socialism enough people will get scared.
She is not a socialist in the way he intends to use the word. -
As to the OP, typical shit from the left trying to conflate "racial justice" with "economic justice". There's a reason so many minorities don't buy what socialists are selling. Nothing new about champagne socialists being unable to understand why minorities won't get in line and vote in their "own interests".
-
TLDR we don't want the state to "own" capital we just want it to direct how it is used, who can own how much of it, and completely control the market.allpurpleallgold said:
True and if he said she calls herself a democratic socialist, I wouldn’t have objected.dnc said:
She's a member of the Democratic Socialists of America.allpurpleallgold said:
She doesn’t call herself a socialist.RaceBannon said:MLK may or may not have been a socialist and the same FBI that the left cheered on against Trump did call him a communist
But AOC calls herself a socialist so what the fuck is she crying about now?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-explained-democratic-socialism-and-capitalism-at-sxsw/ar-BBUA7cd
“Capitalism, to me, is an ideology of capital. The most important thing is the concentration of capital and it means that we prioritize profit and the accumulation of money above all else and we seek it at any human and environmental cost. But when we talk about ideas like democratic socialism, it means putting democracy and society first, instead of capital first, it doesn’t mean that the actual concept of capitalistic society should be abolished.”
This is the argument Race wants to have. Because he thinks if you say the word socialism enough people will get scared.
She is not a socialist in the way he intends to use the word. -
People should be scared of socialists which is why APAG is basically lying here about AOC being a "democratic" socialist which is just gutless bullshit
A system that brings despair and death to millions. Gee why would anyone be against that?
Your damn right I want that argument. Try being honest about it and lets roll -
Is @RaceBannon taking the gloves off?RaceBannon said:People should be scared of socialists which is why APAG is basically lying here about AOC being a "democratic" socialist which is just gutless bullshit
A system that brings despair and death to millions. Gee why would anyone be against that?
Your damn right I want that argument. Try being honest about it and lets roll
