The left's destruction of history
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/07/03/coulter-was-thomas-jefferson-on-the-duke-lacross-team/
Comments
-
“Slander” history by claiming Jefferson probably fathered a child with his slave, who he had a well documented affair with. Wow the damage to the republic is irreparable.
-
I see you didn't read it. Evidence is there/ You ignore it. But then your so far left Stalin is conservative.HardlyClothed said:“Slander” history by claiming Jefferson probably fathered a child with his slave, who he had a well documented affair with. Wow the damage to the republic is irreparable.
Please to post DNA evidence saying he dood it.
-
I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
-
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
-
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
-
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here. -
If you want to fuck the declaration of independence so badly you could head to the national archives and just ask.Sledog said:
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.
Just remember when reading this that it’s the left that is “hysterical”. Criticizing the founders for being slaveowners is even worse than being a slaveowner per Sledog. Criticizing Jefferson for owning slaves is denigrating him in the eyes of our poor children and advocating communism.
Gaze inside the distilled essence of the most internet poisoned conservative mind. -
Can we start applying these same standards to the way we teach the history of MLK?HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
-
In which the guy who intentionally plays dumb to make stupid, obtuse points like this, comparing the transgressions of MLK with Jefferson, defends the actual dumbest person on this site.SFGbob said:
Can we start applying these same standards to the way we teach the history of MLK?HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
Sure, if you want to include the history of MLK’s socialism and that Reagan and much of the Republican party opposed making MLK day a holiday for racial signaling purposes, then yeah go ahead. It would be more accurate than the distorted history of MLK the right currently presents using exactly one quote of his.
-
I was thinking more along the lines of him plagiarizing his Doctoral thesis and cheating on his wife. That should be the emphasis of what we teach in our schools correct?
-
Yes, transgressions just as relevant to his legacy as owning humans as property while authoring the lines “all men are created equal”. What would we do without our brain trust SFGBob.
-
I didn’t say anything about rating transgressions my strawman ass fucking Kunt of a friend, I just thought you were interested in full transparency in the way we teach our history, appears that’s not the case.
-
Teaching that is all the rage these days...HardlyClothed said:Yes, transgressions just as relevant to his legacy as owning humans as property while authoring the lines “all men are created equal”. What would we do without our brain trust SFGBob.
-
*you'reSledog said:
I see you didn't read it. Evidence is there/ You ignore it. But then your so far left Stalin is conservative.HardlyClothed said:“Slander” history by claiming Jefferson probably fathered a child with his slave, who he had a well documented affair with. Wow the damage to the republic is irreparable.
Please to post DNA evidence saying he dood it.
Flyspeck my spelling cuog! -
Sure. Why not?SFGbob said:I was thinking more along the lines of him plagiarizing his Doctoral thesis and cheating on his wife. That should be the emphasis of what we teach in our schools correct?
I'd certainly prefer that take to sledog's panicking over anyone thinking less of a guy who's been dead for a very long time.
Why hide it? Let people know it and they can evaluate what matters on their own. -
The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
-
They probably didn't like his promiscuity. Those were current moral standards.HardlyClothed said:
In which the guy who intentionally plays dumb to make stupid, obtuse points like this, comparing the transgressions of MLK with Jefferson, defends the actual dumbest person on this site.SFGbob said:
Can we start applying these same standards to the way we teach the history of MLK?HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
Sure, if you want to include the history of MLK’s socialism and that Reagan and much of the Republican party opposed making MLK day a holiday for racial signaling purposes, then yeah go ahead. It would be more accurate than the distorted history of MLK the right currently presents using exactly one quote of his.
Supporting fake accusations against some of the greatest Americans is morally correct in the moronic left's eyes. Hiding similar behavior by the left's hero's is everyday practice and is beyond moral standards. -
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this. -
Sledog sounds like a sniveling little bitch in this thread.
-
Not a snively as you. That would be impossible.dflea said:Sledog sounds like a sniveling little bitch in this thread.
-
There is a shitload of stuff not to admire about Thomas Jefferson regardless of whether he fathered a child with his slave. It doesn’t diminish his writing. He was a highly flawed man, however. These weren’t gods; the founders were just men.
-
You only like what they wrote that you agree with. You hate the ability to tax and the requirement to provide the general welfare parts.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this. -
Btw, it is notable that Coulter cherrypicked the parts of the story tending to make paternity seem unlikely. There are other facts that seem to make it more likely. In the end, it’s unlikely we’ll ever know.
-
But they were, in fact, fallible. What someone does with that is a matter of personal belief. It's subjective. There is no point in canonizing anyone. There are no Gods walking amongst us, and most of us know that. That's why I have no issue nailing anyone for hypocrisy. If MLK cheated to get his PhD, then fucking talk about it all you want. Doesn't make his life's work or message any less compelling. At least not to me. I love JFK, and he used to fuck 'em 5 at a time when Jackie went on shopping trips. I'm able to divorce that from his actions as President. Actually, ... nevermind.Sledog said:
Agree but promoting false accusations is a way to diminish the founders. Since the founders are flawed so is what they wrote.PurpleThrobber said:The Throbber could give zero fucks about whether or not TJ dipped his quill in Sally Hemmings' vajayjay. If one of his little swimmers made it upstream and latched onto one of SH's eggs, big fucking deal.
If the two ends of the bell curve want to dick around arguing about whether little Eston Jeff came from the loins of Thomas or Randolph Jefferson, have the fuck at it.
What the Throbber cares about is the words TJ put down on paper that continue to be the fucking bedrock of the US system of governance.
That's where the left is going with this.
Sure, there is a point at which what someone does privately fundamentally calls into question whether they can be trusted in other aspects of their lives.
But a slave owner fucking one of his slaves 225 years ago? Not worried about it, so I can read about it w/o bleeding out my tampon. -
You do come off as a giant bleeding twat in this thread.Sledog said:
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.
Get back to the oxygen tank stat. JFC you can be pretty ridiculous. -
Yawn. Massive twat talks about twats. Imagine!creepycoug said:
You do come off as a giant bleeding twat in this thread.Sledog said:
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.
Get back to the oxygen tank stat. JFC you can be pretty ridiculous. -
Tell!Sledog said:
Yawn. Massive twat talks about twats. Imagine!creepycoug said:
You do come off as a giant bleeding twat in this thread.Sledog said:
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.
Get back to the oxygen tank stat. JFC you can be pretty ridiculous. -
The yawning is from the oxygen.Sledog said:
Yawn. Massive twat talks about twats. Imagine!creepycoug said:
You do come off as a giant bleeding twat in this thread.Sledog said:
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.
Get back to the oxygen tank stat. JFC you can be pretty ridiculous.
The shit retort is from having no game.
Well played as usual.
But you really embarrassed yourself in this one. -
I love watching you lefty twits flop around. It's a lot like kicking kittens only funny.creepycoug said:
The yawning is from the oxygen.Sledog said:
Yawn. Massive twat talks about twats. Imagine!creepycoug said:
You do come off as a giant bleeding twat in this thread.Sledog said:
What does that have to do with anything? Applying modern standards to history is total dumbassness. You fucking 'tard liberals seem to forget that it was the democrat party that did it all and tried to prevent freeing them but here you are a proud member. You are even worse than slave owners of the past.HardlyClothed said:
The poor founders. What’s next, someone pointing out that many of them were slaveowners? Fucking dumbass.Sledog said:
It's the left disparaging the founders. Fuck off little commie.HardlyClothed said:I read it. I don’t think the disputed question of whether TJ fathered children with Hennings is one that slanders history. You have a dog brain.
To denigrate one of the authors of the declaration of independence to lessen him in the eyes of our children (obviously you are a child) and taint one of the greatest minds and documents in human history with lies for no other reason than to advance political goals that oppose that document is sheer and utter lunacy in the name of communism. Nothing new but it's new here.
Get back to the oxygen tank stat. JFC you can be pretty ridiculous.
The shit retort is from having no game.
Well played as usual.
But you really embarrassed yourself in this one.
