Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tax on ultra wealthy
Comments
-
It’s not a matter of belief. It is simply not possible that the mandatory withholding from your pal’s $100k was $58,000. There may be an explanation, but the explanation isn’t that your pal owed 58k on 100k of income. And that was your political point.Sledog said:
No I won't post it. No reason to do so. Believe what you want. Hondo said I lied but won't show he could have confirmed it. But fuck him. I won't walk across the street to piss on him if he was on fire.HHusky said:
You ever going to share this supposed proof of “mandatory” withholding that can’t possibly be mandatory? Or shall we simply expect more chest thumping about how far you’d drive to try to con someone out of a lousy thousand bucks?Sledog said:
Pussies gotta pussy. Runs mouth but now his feet are doing all the running.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite easily.salemcoog said:This is the worst 7-11 thread ever.
-
No it's that that's what was deducted and those were indeed the amounts. No unusual withholding. Those are the correct tax rates and they did take 6.2% for SS. That seems to be what no one can believe. Just googled it. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&oq=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l3.20848j0j7&client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8HHusky said:
It’s not a matter of belief. It is simply not possible that the mandatory withholding from your pal’s $100k was $58,000. There may be an explanation, but the explanation isn’t that your pal owed 58k on 100k of income. And that was your political point.Sledog said:
No I won't post it. No reason to do so. Believe what you want. Hondo said I lied but won't show he could have confirmed it. But fuck him. I won't walk across the street to piss on him if he was on fire.HHusky said:
You ever going to share this supposed proof of “mandatory” withholding that can’t possibly be mandatory? Or shall we simply expect more chest thumping about how far you’d drive to try to con someone out of a lousy thousand bucks?Sledog said:
Pussies gotta pussy. Runs mouth but now his feet are doing all the running.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite easily.salemcoog said:This is the worst 7-11 thread ever.
-
Wow. The longer this thread goes on, the more the Douchebags on HH fag it out.
-
Fortunately, your time here is still spent voluntarily.TurdBomber said:Wow. The longer this thread goes on, the more the Douchebags on HH fag it out.
-
The Racist Proves the Point.HHusky said:
Fortunately, your time here is still spent voluntarily.TurdBomber said:Wow. The longer this thread goes on, the more the Douchebags on HH fag it out.
-
See there you go showing you are a liar again. Your link even showed SS capped around $130k. The 37% tax bracket is over around $400k. And the California state tax of 13% is over $1 million.Sledog said:
No it's that that's what was deducted and those were indeed the amounts. No unusual withholding. Those are the correct tax rates and they did take 6.2% for SS. That seems to be what no one can believe. Just googled it. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&oq=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l3.20848j0j7&client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8HHusky said:
It’s not a matter of belief. It is simply not possible that the mandatory withholding from your pal’s $100k was $58,000. There may be an explanation, but the explanation isn’t that your pal owed 58k on 100k of income. And that was your political point.Sledog said:
No I won't post it. No reason to do so. Believe what you want. Hondo said I lied but won't show he could have confirmed it. But fuck him. I won't walk across the street to piss on him if he was on fire.HHusky said:
You ever going to share this supposed proof of “mandatory” withholding that can’t possibly be mandatory? Or shall we simply expect more chest thumping about how far you’d drive to try to con someone out of a lousy thousand bucks?Sledog said:
Pussies gotta pussy. Runs mouth but now his feet are doing all the running.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite easily.salemcoog said:This is the worst 7-11 thread ever.
You are lying your ass off and I wasn't going to waste my time driving to a mall you are no where near. -
Well if you get a paycheck for 100k what's your projected yearly salary? Fuck off you worthless lying shitbird.2001400ex said:
See there you go showing you are a liar again. Your link even showed SS capped around $130k. The 37% tax bracket is over around $400k. And the California state tax of 13% is over $1 million.Sledog said:
No it's that that's what was deducted and those were indeed the amounts. No unusual withholding. Those are the correct tax rates and they did take 6.2% for SS. That seems to be what no one can believe. Just googled it. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&oq=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l3.20848j0j7&client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8HHusky said:
It’s not a matter of belief. It is simply not possible that the mandatory withholding from your pal’s $100k was $58,000. There may be an explanation, but the explanation isn’t that your pal owed 58k on 100k of income. And that was your political point.Sledog said:
No I won't post it. No reason to do so. Believe what you want. Hondo said I lied but won't show he could have confirmed it. But fuck him. I won't walk across the street to piss on him if he was on fire.HHusky said:
You ever going to share this supposed proof of “mandatory” withholding that can’t possibly be mandatory? Or shall we simply expect more chest thumping about how far you’d drive to try to con someone out of a lousy thousand bucks?Sledog said:
Pussies gotta pussy. Runs mouth but now his feet are doing all the running.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite easily.salemcoog said:This is the worst 7-11 thread ever.
You are lying your ass off and I wasn't going to waste my time driving to a mall you are no where near. -
You got called in your bluff. Now STFU.Sledog said:
Well if you get a paycheck for 100k what's your projected yearly salary? Fuck off you worthless lying shitbird.2001400ex said:
See there you go showing you are a liar again. Your link even showed SS capped around $130k. The 37% tax bracket is over around $400k. And the California state tax of 13% is over $1 million.Sledog said:
No it's that that's what was deducted and those were indeed the amounts. No unusual withholding. Those are the correct tax rates and they did take 6.2% for SS. That seems to be what no one can believe. Just googled it. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&oq=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l3.20848j0j7&client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8HHusky said:
It’s not a matter of belief. It is simply not possible that the mandatory withholding from your pal’s $100k was $58,000. There may be an explanation, but the explanation isn’t that your pal owed 58k on 100k of income. And that was your political point.Sledog said:
No I won't post it. No reason to do so. Believe what you want. Hondo said I lied but won't show he could have confirmed it. But fuck him. I won't walk across the street to piss on him if he was on fire.HHusky said:
You ever going to share this supposed proof of “mandatory” withholding that can’t possibly be mandatory? Or shall we simply expect more chest thumping about how far you’d drive to try to con someone out of a lousy thousand bucks?Sledog said:
Pussies gotta pussy. Runs mouth but now his feet are doing all the running.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite easily.salemcoog said:This is the worst 7-11 thread ever.
You are lying your ass off and I wasn't going to waste my time driving to a mall you are no where near. -
No bluff you gutless twat.2001400ex said:
You got called in your bluff. Now STFU.Sledog said:
Well if you get a paycheck for 100k what's your projected yearly salary? Fuck off you worthless lying shitbird.2001400ex said:
See there you go showing you are a liar again. Your link even showed SS capped around $130k. The 37% tax bracket is over around $400k. And the California state tax of 13% is over $1 million.Sledog said:
No it's that that's what was deducted and those were indeed the amounts. No unusual withholding. Those are the correct tax rates and they did take 6.2% for SS. That seems to be what no one can believe. Just googled it. https://www.google.com/search?q=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&oq=what+percentage+of+your+pay+goes+to+social+security&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l3.20848j0j7&client=ms-android-hms-tmobile-us&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8HHusky said:
It’s not a matter of belief. It is simply not possible that the mandatory withholding from your pal’s $100k was $58,000. There may be an explanation, but the explanation isn’t that your pal owed 58k on 100k of income. And that was your political point.Sledog said:
No I won't post it. No reason to do so. Believe what you want. Hondo said I lied but won't show he could have confirmed it. But fuck him. I won't walk across the street to piss on him if he was on fire.HHusky said:
You ever going to share this supposed proof of “mandatory” withholding that can’t possibly be mandatory? Or shall we simply expect more chest thumping about how far you’d drive to try to con someone out of a lousy thousand bucks?Sledog said:
Pussies gotta pussy. Runs mouth but now his feet are doing all the running.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Quite easily.salemcoog said:This is the worst 7-11 thread ever.
You are lying your ass off and I wasn't going to waste my time driving to a mall you are no where near. -
HurtfulTurdBomber said:
The Racist Proves the Point.HHusky said:
Fortunately, your time here is still spent voluntarily.TurdBomber said:Wow. The longer this thread goes on, the more the Douchebags on HH fag it out.
