Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Gibson’s Bakery wins $11 million award against Oberlin College
DJDuck
Member Posts: 5,970
in Tug Tavern
VERDICT: Jury awards Gibson’s Bakery $11 million against Oberlin College
Comments Permalink
Punitive damage phase to start next Tuesday, which could increase the damages to $33 million
https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/verdict-jury-awards-gibsons-bakery-11-million-against-oberlin-college/
“The verdict sends a strong message that colleges and universities cannot simply wind up and set loose student social justice warriors and then wash their hands of the consequences. In this case, a wholly innocent 5th-generation bakery was falsely accused of being racist and having a history racial profiling after stopping three black Oberlin College students from shoplifting. The students eventually pleaded guilty, but not before large protests and boycotts intended to destroy the bakery and defame the owners. The jury appears to have accepted that Oberlin College facilitated the wrongful conduct against the bakery.”
Comments Permalink
Punitive damage phase to start next Tuesday, which could increase the damages to $33 million
https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/06/verdict-jury-awards-gibsons-bakery-11-million-against-oberlin-college/
“The verdict sends a strong message that colleges and universities cannot simply wind up and set loose student social justice warriors and then wash their hands of the consequences. In this case, a wholly innocent 5th-generation bakery was falsely accused of being racist and having a history racial profiling after stopping three black Oberlin College students from shoplifting. The students eventually pleaded guilty, but not before large protests and boycotts intended to destroy the bakery and defame the owners. The jury appears to have accepted that Oberlin College facilitated the wrongful conduct against the bakery.”
Comments
-
DJ sure is litigation happy today.
I’m sorry Peggy Noonan called you stupid btw. It’s not entirely your fault. -
For bringing up one significant Verdict?
-
True the Vote?
It really is whose ox you perceive as having been gored, ain’t it? -
No that’s NOT the point. You claimed I was “Litigation Happy” for posting on one important jury verdict. How is that “litigation happy”? I know obfuscation is one of your favorite methods of avoiding answering. This is not tough.
-
Ohio jury awards $11 million to bakery owners targeted by Oberlin College student protests
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/7/ohio-jury-awards-11-million-to-bakery-owners-targe/ -
All you understand about both (ie TWO) cases you brought up is that people who you think agree with you won. You would otherwise view a successful piece of litigation as “ambulance chasing”. Cuz that’s your depth, Deej.
-
You still didn’t answer the question. You have no idea of the depth of what I know except that you were regularly slapped around on The Woodshed by Bob me and others for Your lack of knowledge of any number of issues.
-
Said without irony.DJDuck said:You still didn’t answer the question. You have no idea of the depth of what I know except that you were regularly slapped around on The Woodshed by Bob me and others for Your lack of knowledge of any number of issues.
That’s funny. -
What was the other verdict? If there is does it mean someone is “litigation happy” which is my main question that you so cravenly avoid.
-
What is your definition of being “ Litigation Happy”?
