Yella's got big balls, Pumpeii - do you?
Comments
-
11-1. Every big game at home (Oregon, Utah, USC, WSU). I don't consider Stanford good anymore, as their talent keeps declining year over year. UW makes the playoff.
-
We have not won on the farm since 2007. Despite having literally more fans in the stadium, we shrivel our dicks and lose.ntxduck said:11-1. Every big game at home (Oregon, Utah, USC, WSU). I don't consider Stanford good anymore, as their talent keeps declining year over year. UW makes the playoff.
-
Well we’ve only played down there once since a we stopped sucking.Gladstone said:
We have not won on the farm since 2007. Despite having literally more fans in the stadium, we shrivel our dicks and lose.ntxduck said:11-1. Every big game at home (Oregon, Utah, USC, WSU). I don't consider Stanford good anymore, as their talent keeps declining year over year. UW makes the playoff.
-
If we aren’t at a Friday Happy Hour at Joey’s then there’s something wrong with the worldYellowSnow said:
It's definitely plausible but I'm not feeling USC as a loss. @Swaye is coming to Seattle for that one and we're going go shopping for fondue pots at U Village Crate and Barrel and scope out the MILF scene.RaceBannon said:Loss to USC
Already posted UW as pac12 champs but not in the playoffs -
puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yella..Pup was 1st to make a prediction...i took Oregon to win north/pac in January dumbass, and again a few weeks ago.
Pups north/south and all power 5 picks come in August (the only to do so every year).
Yellow, youve NEVER done that. Lets see who has BALLS when it matters. I think Race was the only other on HH to make picks (although plagiarized) last year. Step up when it counts there tough gyy..lofl
Fuck youpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Yella..Pup was 1st to make a prediction...i took Oregon to win north/pac in January dumbass, and again a few weeks ago.
Pups north/south and all power 5 picks come in August (the only to do so every year).
Yellow, youve NEVER done that. Lets see who has BALLS when it matters. I think Race was the only other on HH to make picks (although plagiarized) last year. Step up when it counts there tough gyy..lofl -
@Swaye don’t be a puffy little ginage.Tequilla said:
If we aren’t at a Friday Happy Hour at Joey’s then there’s something wrong with the worldYellowSnow said:
It's definitely plausible but I'm not feeling USC as a loss. @Swaye is coming to Seattle for that one and we're going go shopping for fondue pots at U Village Crate and Barrel and scope out the MILF scene.RaceBannon said:Loss to USC
Already posted UW as pac12 champs but not in the playoffs -
Tequilla said:
If we aren’t at a Friday Harbor Happy Hour at Joey’s then there’s something wrong with the worldYellowSnow said:
It's definitely plausible but I'm not feeling USC as a loss. @Swaye is coming to Seattle for that one and we're going go shopping for fondue pots at U Village Crate and Barrel and scope out the MILF scene.RaceBannon said:Loss to USC
Already posted UW as pac12 champs but not in the playoffs -
That’s also how I read itGrundleStiltzkin said:Tequilla said:
If we aren’t at a Friday Harbor Happy Hour at Joey’s then there’s something wrong with the worldYellowSnow said:
It's definitely plausible but I'm not feeling USC as a loss. @Swaye is coming to Seattle for that one and we're going go shopping for fondue pots at U Village Crate and Barrel and scope out the MILF scene.RaceBannon said:Loss to USC
Already posted UW as pac12 champs but not in the playoffs -
Tell more me please.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
There's this thing called TECH. Check it out its catching on Europe has downtime too..a lot of it. When youve seen it 100 times it gets old. Pup doesnt bother with faggy tourists during the day..he just hangs on the veranda enjoying tea. My time in Europe is all about cuisine, wine, spirits and beer.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
How’s Europe?puppylove_sugarsteel said:Ok Yellasnow. Pups picking Oregon, in May, but only if Herbert stays healthy, they find a second WR, Thibideau is all he's cracked up to be. If not i get to change my prediction. Ok?
We'd have beat Auburn and CAL with Eason or Haener. If Haener started at CAL, instead of being forced into that late 4th quarter debacle, vs the best pass defense in the pac12, among tops in the cou, UW would have finshed closer to yous fags 11-1 'non' predictions.Doogles said:
My Doogish prediction is predicated on Skinny being the 5-star QB this offense needed. That pretty much wipes out our weakness against Utah(and every loss we had).UW_Doog_Bot said:
Actually I'm curious to see if we beat Utah in a Pac12 CG again(If they win the South). I think we beat them at home this year but I could see an upset at years end with how close the last one was.Doogles said:
I stand/Doog with Yella. 12-1 and UW wins the North/P12. Pending what happens around the country we make the playoff.YellowSnow said:
What's UW's record going to be? I'm going on record here in May saying Oregon ain't winning the North. It's UW at 11-1. I don't need to wait to August.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Yella..Pup was 1st to make a prediction...i took Oregon to win north/pac in January dumbass, and again a few weeks ago.
Pups north/south and all power 5 picks come in August (the only to do so every year).
Yellow, youve NEVER done that. Lets see who has BALLS when it matters. I think Race was the only other on HH to make picks (although plagiarized) last year. Step up when it counts there tough gyy..lofl
Oregon is NOT winning the North. Take all the screenshots you need. Smoke that shit to the finger tips.
Adjusting for the inevitable wtf loss 99% of college teams have, if we go 11-1 we're winning the P12CG.
If Skinny isn't what he's billed, we still win the North at 10-2. We're not losing to Oregon or the Coug.
Instead UW had 4 losses, pups 1st pick;). Yet some worthless Pup-envy twister here keeps hanging on to pups 'unlikely' Phantom 6-6 finish. Such a putz you are. UCLA AND ASU all had legit chances to beat UW. UW should have buried all 2 by 17+pts. Colorado pushed us around for 4 quarters for fuck sake. Closer than should have been.
ASU had Pete beat if he got an OT. Herm dominated UW on LOS. But why bring up the fa0cts, film? Herm had Pete beat. Just ran out of time. Youd have to actually watch that game to understand. -
The deadline was August 31, all conferences. 2 here made picks. Race and Pup. Now go deuche and come back with a fresh post;) let me reiterate... 2, Pup and Race;) Race plagiarized but at least he made an effort.whatshouldicareabout said:
106 people made picks last year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Yella..Pup was 1st to make a prediction...i took Oregon to win north/pac in January dumbass, and again a few weeks ago.
Pups north/south and all power 5 picks come in August (the only to do so every year).
Yellow, youve NEVER done that. Lets see who has BALLS when it matters. I think Race was the only other on HH to make picks (although plagiarized) last year. Step up when it counts there tough gyy..lofl
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/49627/time-to-embarrass-yourself-again-predict-uws-2018-team-record/p1
Hopefully a few more of you cuntwards will step up to the plate this year. -
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
-
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
-
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4 -
10-4. Huh. Notice loss column. Pup spot on of course. Race 13-1 (only other to make a prediction and not close) forget Vegas...just call Pupper's 1-800 line to make a buck. Pup covers all 5 conferences, every week. Or call Race.Pitchfork51 said:
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4
Baze, Base, Slice, careabout...who you guys like in pac12? Yella stepped up -
If we go 8-4 with all this talent and this soft as shit on charmin schedule I'm not saying I'll be on the #firepete wagon but I'll definitely be considering how much a seat costs.Pitchfork51 said:
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4 -
What's wrong with my polls? Been doing it for 4 years, over 400 picks. People seem to like it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
The deadline was August 31, all conferences. 2 here made picks. Race and Pup. Now go deuche and come back with a fresh post;) let me reiterate... 2, Pup and Race;) Race plagiarized but at least he made an effort.whatshouldicareabout said:
106 people made picks last year.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Yella..Pup was 1st to make a prediction...i took Oregon to win north/pac in January dumbass, and again a few weeks ago.
Pups north/south and all power 5 picks come in August (the only to do so every year).
Yellow, youve NEVER done that. Lets see who has BALLS when it matters. I think Race was the only other on HH to make picks (although plagiarized) last year. Step up when it counts there tough gyy..lofl
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/49627/time-to-embarrass-yourself-again-predict-uws-2018-team-record/p1
Hopefully a few more of you cuntwards will step up to the plate this year.
We also have Pick 'Em. What's wrong with that? FMB runs it. Bowl one was fun too https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/55758/2018-19-bowl-pickem-standings
You should step out of your comfort zone one of these days and try something fun. -
BOT, i got a read on you as kind of a dipshit. I like you so i have hope, but you sometimes make really ignorant statements. You have to be objective. Any jackwagon can host a podcast, mostly its a partison subjective hack who does...be different. Id destroy u on your podcast in 3 minutes on this years team, 'charmin' schedule.. Care to entertain the offer?UW_Doog_Bot said:
If we go 8-4 with all this talent and this soft as shit on charmin schedule I'm not saying I'll be on the #firepete wagon but I'll definitely be considering how much a seat costs.Pitchfork51 said:
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4 -
If you’re gonna pod though, Pup, we need more fishing talk and tales of good poundings. Less football takes.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
BOT, i got a read on you as kind of a dipshit. I like you so i have hope, but you sometimes make really ignorant statements. You have to be objective. Any jackwagon can host a podcast, mostly its a partison subjective hack who does...be different. Id destroy u on your podcast in 3 minutes on this years team, 'charmin' schedule.. Care to entertain the offer?UW_Doog_Bot said:
If we go 8-4 with all this talent and this soft as shit on charmin schedule I'm not saying I'll be on the #firepete wagon but I'll definitely be considering how much a seat costs.Pitchfork51 said:
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4 -
Thats fine, but im at HH to talk husky football. The other stuff is personal...i just share bits and pieces...not why im here. You dig? Ill dab in it but I want to talk dawgs yellow. Ill talk fly fishing for 4 hours but nobody would listen. Pussy? All day long. But its a HH FOOTBALL forum for fucks sakeYellowSnow said:
If you’re gonna pod though, Pup, we need more fishing talk and tales of good poundings. Less football takes.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
BOT, i got a read on you as kind of a dipshit. I like you so i have hope, but you sometimes make really ignorant statements. You have to be objective. Any jackwagon can host a podcast, mostly its a partison subjective hack who does...be different. Id destroy u on your podcast in 3 minutes on this years team, 'charmin' schedule.. Care to entertain the offer?UW_Doog_Bot said:
If we go 8-4 with all this talent and this soft as shit on charmin schedule I'm not saying I'll be on the #firepete wagon but I'll definitely be considering how much a seat costs.Pitchfork51 said:
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4 -
Straight football talk is boring usually. It always needs a little color.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Thats fine, but im at HH to talk husky football. The other stuff is personal...i just share bits and pieces...not why im here. You dig? Ill dab in it but I want to talk dawgs yellow. Ill talk fly fishing for 4 hours but nobody would listen. Pussy? All day long. But its a HH FOOTBALL forum for fucks sakeYellowSnow said:
If you’re gonna pod though, Pup, we need more fishing talk and tales of good poundings. Less football takes.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
BOT, i got a read on you as kind of a dipshit. I like you so i have hope, but you sometimes make really ignorant statements. You have to be objective. Any jackwagon can host a podcast, mostly its a partison subjective hack who does...be different. Id destroy u on your podcast in 3 minutes on this years team, 'charmin' schedule.. Care to entertain the offer?UW_Doog_Bot said:
If we go 8-4 with all this talent and this soft as shit on charmin schedule I'm not saying I'll be on the #firepete wagon but I'll definitely be considering how much a seat costs.Pitchfork51 said:
8-4puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Good post Bot. That's about where I'd put UW post spring. 9-3, 10-2 with luck. 11-1 is fucking pipe pipe dream...but Yella is used to pipes and dreaming.. But I like him, and give him credit for going out on a limb. Nobody else here does.UW_Doog_Bot said:
The initial run of the proprietary UW Doog Bot Season Wins Calculator® came up with an expected value of 9.76. Even if I adjust some of the values for optimism's sake(like Eason being healthy or Stanford finally collapsing for examples) I think the closest rounded value will still come out to 10-2. I'd expect the over/under to be lower than your 10.5 but higher than my 9.76. 10-2YellowSnow said:
The over/under I keep hearing is 10.5UW_Doog_Bot said:For the record my prediction will be between 10-2 and 12-0. I will ascribe % likelihoods as I start up the calculator later in the off season. 11-1 and 10-2 are probably most likely outcomes. Not sure which one will be more likely after the methodology is applied. If we lose, it will be a conference game, and could easily be something stupid like losing @Arizona even though we are favored. Even if you "should" win every game over the course of enough games in a season statistically you'll drop one.
8-4
8-4
Tell you what - if you pod with @UW_Doog_Bot again I’ll jump on.
