Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Yella's got big balls, Pumpeii - do you?

Options
2456

Comments

  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,147 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    salemcoog said:

    Doogles said:

    Fuck me for riding with old yella but if Eason is who we think he is this team is going to be better.

    Not sold on safety play, but Cam Williams killing it in spring and Irvin/Asa participating in Fall plus a soft opening schedule eases the worry.

    DL will be dominant. Edge play will be more explosive.

    Feel the same about ILB as safety, enough talent and time to not completely drop off from the AA BBK era.

    OL will be the best in Pete era to give Salvon bigger holes to explode through. I like Pleasant and Mcgrew as hard running pace changers.

    BTE and WTE have at least 3 guys that will be in the NFL and they aren't freshman anymore.

    WR is hugely upgraded with the talent finally showing out. Even the JAGs will be better with another year and a real QB.


    I'm shocked how little preseason hype this team is getting. National pundits have Oregon as the runaway favorite, but I'm not seeing it.

    UW wins it going away.



    They can be as big as a Mack truck.



    Ahmed will still head towards the sidelines.
    I hate you for probably being right. We find out for sure this year

    We do have a Colombian drug lord that runs hard in the trenches though. If we have a great O line someone will run it through the holes
    Amazing what a deep ball threat will do to open up some running lanes.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    Any loss this season will be inexplicable. I know it's probably going to happen, but predicting which is a total crap shoot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    RUN THE FUCKING FOOTBALL!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • backthepack
    backthepack Member Posts: 19,937
    And we’ll be fine
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,691 Swaye's Wigwam
    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    10-2.

    I think they'll take SC seriously this time, but this leaves them susceptible to letdown in a tough game on the road at Stanford in front of a pro-UW crowd.
    I think Pete takes racismgate personally and rams the plunger deep into Oregon. At least three scores. Maybe they get caught looking forward to that one, though and fuck off against Arizona.
    They get a bye before the mighty Ute, but that game is still a tossup.

    The teams they'll play that actually have some talent are USC, Stanford, Utah, and Oregon. They'll lose to one of them. Only Stanford on the road, so I'll go with that.
    They'll inexplicably drop one game to some shit team, and we'll all be buying new TVs after throwing something through our current ones. Good options here are Arizona and Colorado.

    I believe every season will be the same until it isn't.

    This is why it's good I have a projector.
    Great, now you get to patch drywall!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UW_Doog_Bot
    UW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 17,812 Swaye's Wigwam
    1to392831weretaken said:

    UW_Doog_Bot said:

    1to392831weretaken said:

    10-2.

    I think they'll take SC seriously this time, but this leaves them susceptible to letdown in a tough game on the road at Stanford in front of a pro-UW crowd.
    I think Pete takes racismgate personally and rams the plunger deep into Oregon. At least three scores. Maybe they get caught looking forward to that one, though and fuck off against Arizona.
    They get a bye before the mighty Ute, but that game is still a tossup.

    The teams they'll play that actually have some talent are USC, Stanford, Utah, and Oregon. They'll lose to one of them. Only Stanford on the road, so I'll go with that.
    They'll inexplicably drop one game to some shit team, and we'll all be buying new TVs after throwing something through our current ones. Good options here are Arizona and Colorado.

    I believe every season will be the same until it isn't.

    This is why it's good I have a projector.
    Great, now you get to patch drywall!
    Cheap and easy compared to an LED screen.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,691 Swaye's Wigwam
    Or you just leave it and call it a "speed hole."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chuck
    chuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,626 Swaye's Wigwam
    Gladstone said:

    chuck said:

    Any loss this season will be inexplicable. I know it's probably going to happen, but predicting which is a total crap shoot.

    It won't be inexplicable. We've gone through the P12 undefeated twice since 1916. 1960 and 1991.

    Sounds like you're expecting a national championship.

    Also suck it boobs, we won the natty in 1984 too. Where is your flagged post god now? gg
    You misread me gladly. I expect neither 12-0 or a natty. I expect a loss or two, but each of them will be inexplicable, as I said, because this UW team will have the tools to handle every team on the schedule rather easily.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member Posts: 7,284
    YellowSnow said:

    I also forgot to dedicate this poast to my Dwag and the best steelheader this side of Maltby @dflea

    I appreciate the props, and also like to see you charging to maximum doog. I, too, think that Eason is going to step in and take control of the offense like he's swinging a huge dick, and he'll have the arm to throw deep, and will keep defenders off the line. That right there should make us a better team on offense. Losing Gaskin is big hole to fill, but someone is going to do it.

    I haven't yet charged to maximum doog, but I could see it happening. I usually need a crisp fall morning to get charged up to that level. I admire your big sack in making the call already.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eason is good we will go 11-1. If he’s not, 9-3.

    15-0*
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member Posts: 8,780 Standard Supporter
    lot of doogin' going on here. blame Pete, all I know is I will get stinking drunk during 4 games, ranting and raving at my TV (not DDY angry) twice being justifiable and twice being amazed that we pulled out a win. Then being totally dejected as we lose another NY6 bowel game
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,613
    Do u think u guys can beat oregon
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 1to392831weretaken
    1to392831weretaken Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,691 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited May 2019
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

    Or you just leave it and call it a "glory hole."

    This is an inexcusable miss by me...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Gladstone said:

    chuck said:

    Any loss this season will be inexplicable. I know it's probably going to happen, but predicting which is a total crap shoot.

    It won't be inexplicable. We've gone through the P12 undefeated twice since 1916. 1960 and 1991.

    Sounds like you're expecting a national championship.

    Also suck it boobs, we won the natty in 1984 too. Where is your flagged post god now? gg
    I enjoy that Sven ribkick more than I should
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter