"Collusion" sets up a false choice
Comments
-
That's a good Kunt. Just ignore all the evidence that was provided showing that you're dead wrong and double down on your bullshit.ApostleofGrief said:Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or. He posted the word countlessly.
Trump didn't start the use of "Collusion." The Rats did. The fact that Trump then denied any "Collusion" doesn't mean that he started it's use or that it was never part of the left's rhetoric.
Take your loss like a man and don't be like Hondo. -
Collusion was being used by the Rats and the Media, same thing, in July of 2016.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/clinton-campaign-chief-russians-trump-pro-russian-platform/story?id=40824946
To claim that Trump started it's use is pure crap. -
And to claim Trump had no knowledge Russians had DNC and Hillary emails is pure crap.SFGbob said:Collusion was being used by the Rats and the Media, same thing, in July of 2016.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/clinton-campaign-chief-russians-trump-pro-russian-platform/story?id=40824946
To claim that Trump started it's use is pure crap. -
I read all this shit and I came to the collusion, I mean conclusion, that if it was a stolen blow job Trump should be impeached
-
No this is pure crap:2001400ex said:
And to claim Trump had no knowledge Russians had DNC and Hillary emails is pure crap.SFGbob said:Collusion was being used by the Rats and the Media, same thing, in July of 2016.
https://abcnews.go.com/ThisWeek/clinton-campaign-chief-russians-trump-pro-russian-platform/story?id=40824946
To claim that Trump started it's use is pure crap.
And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.
If you have evidence that Trump knew the Russians had the DNC and Hillary emails lets see it Hondo because the word of pathological liar isn't worth much. I've not claimed that Trump had no knowledge because unlike you I'm not a liar and I have no evidence one way or the other. All I know is that I've not seen any evidence to support the claim that "Trump knew." -
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?
-
And if the argument was over how many times Trump said "no collusion" or if Trump has ever used the word "collusion" you'd be kicking ass right now AoG.ApostleofGrief said:
But unfortunately for you the points of contention are these claims by you:
Collusion has always been the GOP rhetoric not the lefts
Trump started the use of "collusion" as a means of setting up an either-or.
And those claims are pure garbage. But keep fucking that chicken.
Collusion hasn't "always" been part of the GOP's rhetoric. It was started by the Rats and their pals in the press. I posted a link that showed you where ABC News was using the word in July of 2016. Trump denying what he was being accused of doing isn't him "start[ing]" anything.
-
They will. There is a process.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Then the House is within rights to bring impeachment charges. Why haven't they?ApostleofGrief said:
He can't charge a sitting president, if that is what you meanSFGbob said:Why didn't Mueller charge anyone with this crime?




