Christians do this shit all the time.
Comments
-
Why is it that the only places that execute gays are all Muslim countries since that actions according to you, has nothing to do with Islam. Wouldn't you think there'd be at least one non-Muslim country on the list.HHusky said:
Take it easy, Tiger. That straw man can’t take much more.SFGbob said:
The people living in SA would say it's an act of Islam. They certainly believe that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable to Islam. And for some reason, all the other places that execute gays are also Islamic countries, but according to you, it doesn't have anything to do with Islam, because you know a Muslim guy that would never do this.HHusky said:Quoted you directly. You specifically called what SA does an act of Islam.
What’s your first language? -
Funny how you are against Muslims executing gay people. But for Christians persecuting gay people. Here's a hint Bob. Both are wrong.SFGbob said:
Why is it that the only places that execute gays are all Muslim countries since that actions according to you, has nothing to do with Islam. Wouldn't you think there'd be at least one non-Muslim country on the list.HHusky said:
Take it easy, Tiger. That straw man can’t take much more.SFGbob said:
The people living in SA would say it's an act of Islam. They certainly believe that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable to Islam. And for some reason, all the other places that execute gays are also Islamic countries, but according to you, it doesn't have anything to do with Islam, because you know a Muslim guy that would never do this.HHusky said:Quoted you directly. You specifically called what SA does an act of Islam.
What’s your first language? -
Jesus2001400ex said:
Funny how you are against Muslims executing gay people. But for Christians persecuting gay people. Here's a hint Bob. Both are wrong.SFGbob said:
Why is it that the only places that execute gays are all Muslim countries since that actions according to you, has nothing to do with Islam. Wouldn't you think there'd be at least one non-Muslim country on the list.HHusky said:
Take it easy, Tiger. That straw man can’t take much more.SFGbob said:
The people living in SA would say it's an act of Islam. They certainly believe that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable to Islam. And for some reason, all the other places that execute gays are also Islamic countries, but according to you, it doesn't have anything to do with Islam, because you know a Muslim guy that would never do this.HHusky said:Quoted you directly. You specifically called what SA does an act of Islam.
What’s your first language?
Can you be anymore lame? -
Define white nationalist succinctly please.2001400ex said:
Hi there! Lol lyin Bob.SFGbob said:
I do. Why are you pathological liar?2001400ex said:
Why don't you condemn the actions of white nationalists Bob?SFGbob said:
Good thing you said nothing to condemn the actions of Islam. Why do I suspect that if theses were Christians carrying out these executions in the name of their religion you wouldn't be so silent.HardlyClothed said:Good thing our President isn’t clearly accepting bribes from the Saudi Royal Family and vetoing legislation ending US support for their war in Yemen and giving priority to whatever they want done in the Middle East (2nd only to Israel of course)
https://hardcorehusky.com/discussion/58676/very-fine-people-on-both-sides#latest -
I believe he can and I believe he has.RaceBannon said:
Jesus2001400ex said:
Funny how you are against Muslims executing gay people. But for Christians persecuting gay people. Here's a hint Bob. Both are wrong.SFGbob said:
Why is it that the only places that execute gays are all Muslim countries since that actions according to you, has nothing to do with Islam. Wouldn't you think there'd be at least one non-Muslim country on the list.HHusky said:
Take it easy, Tiger. That straw man can’t take much more.SFGbob said:
The people living in SA would say it's an act of Islam. They certainly believe that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable to Islam. And for some reason, all the other places that execute gays are also Islamic countries, but according to you, it doesn't have anything to do with Islam, because you know a Muslim guy that would never do this.HHusky said:Quoted you directly. You specifically called what SA does an act of Islam.
What’s your first language?
Can you be anymore lame? -
There is no God. They’re all stupid. And therefore dangerous. I wish there was a God and he would rapture all of them off the planet right now.
-
Want to see a pathological lying Kunt dance?2001400ex said:
Funny how you are against Muslims executing gay people. But for Christians persecuting gay people. Here's a hint Bob. Both are wrong.SFGbob said:
Why is it that the only places that execute gays are all Muslim countries since that actions according to you, has nothing to do with Islam. Wouldn't you think there'd be at least one non-Muslim country on the list.HHusky said:
Take it easy, Tiger. That straw man can’t take much more.SFGbob said:
The people living in SA would say it's an act of Islam. They certainly believe that what they are doing is perfectly acceptable to Islam. And for some reason, all the other places that execute gays are also Islamic countries, but according to you, it doesn't have anything to do with Islam, because you know a Muslim guy that would never do this.HHusky said:Quoted you directly. You specifically called what SA does an act of Islam.
What’s your first language?
Cite for me the instances where I've supported Christians persecuting gay people Hondo. Cue the Kunt act. -
Wanting to end our support for a military intervention is actually an intervention? Pretzel logic.RaceBannon said:
I'm rooting for IranHardlyClothed said:
I like telling my own country’s military not to refuel the Saudi warplanes dropping barrel bombs on Yemeni schoolchildren. Apparently you don’t.RaceBannon said:
I thought you were against intervention and telling countries what to do?HardlyClothed said:Good thing our President isn’t clearly accepting bribes from the Saudi Royal Family and vetoing legislation ending US support for their war in Yemen and giving priority to whatever they want done in the Middle East (2nd only to Israel of course)
When did you become an interventionist? -
SFGbob said:
Good thing you said nothing to condemn the actions of Islam. Why do I suspect that if theses were Christians carrying out these executions in the name of their religion you wouldn't be so silent.HardlyClothed said:Good thing our President isn’t clearly accepting bribes from the Saudi Royal Family and vetoing legislation ending US support for their war in Yemen and giving priority to whatever they want done in the Middle East (2nd only to Israel of course)
Look at this fucking loser demanding condemnation from people on a message board. Hey idiot I’m against the death penalty writ large. The longstanding US alliance with Saudi Arabia has been a net negative for our country. The Cold War strategy of promoting Islamic political revivalism as a counter to pan-arab nationalism, arab socialism, and ba’athism with the Saudis running point has backfired spectacularly and no American interest group has contributed more to that than the GOP.
However I would support them if they gave you a haircut in chop chop square. -
I must have missed where I demanded anything from you Kunt. You don't give a fuck if Muslims kill gays. You only cry when Christians oppose gay marriage.HardlyClothed said:SFGbob said:
Good thing you said nothing to condemn the actions of Islam. Why do I suspect that if theses were Christians carrying out these executions in the name of their religion you wouldn't be so silent.HardlyClothed said:Good thing our President isn’t clearly accepting bribes from the Saudi Royal Family and vetoing legislation ending US support for their war in Yemen and giving priority to whatever they want done in the Middle East (2nd only to Israel of course)
Look at this fucking loser demanding condemnation from people on a message board. Hey idiot I’m against the death penalty writ large. The longstanding US alliance with Saudi Arabia has been a net negative for our country. The Cold War strategy of promoting Islamic political revivalism as a counter to pan-arab nationalism, arab socialism, and ba’athism with the Saudis running point has backfired spectacularly and no American interest group has contributed more to that than the GOP.
However I would support them if they gave you a haircut in chop chop square. -
Sure, worm. Muslims killing gays is bad. The population oppressing gays in the United States, the country we all live in and participate in its political system, has been conservative christians.SFGbob said:
I must have missed where I demanded anything from you Kunt. You don't give a fuck if Muslims kill gays. You only cry when Christians oppose gay marriage.HardlyClothed said:SFGbob said:
Good thing you said nothing to condemn the actions of Islam. Why do I suspect that if theses were Christians carrying out these executions in the name of their religion you wouldn't be so silent.HardlyClothed said:Good thing our President isn’t clearly accepting bribes from the Saudi Royal Family and vetoing legislation ending US support for their war in Yemen and giving priority to whatever they want done in the Middle East (2nd only to Israel of course)
Look at this fucking loser demanding condemnation from people on a message board. Hey idiot I’m against the death penalty writ large. The longstanding US alliance with Saudi Arabia has been a net negative for our country. The Cold War strategy of promoting Islamic political revivalism as a counter to pan-arab nationalism, arab socialism, and ba’athism with the Saudis running point has backfired spectacularly and no American interest group has contributed more to that than the GOP.
However I would support them if they gave you a haircut in chop chop square.
But thank you for your transparent concern trolling about the treatment of gays abroad. -
Yes, yes gays are horribly oppressed here in the US. If only they lived in Iran where the worst that could happen to them was being tossed off a building as opposed to the brutal "oppression" they face here.
-
And there it is, it would be convenient for your political team if the focus was shifted off conservative christian bigotry wouldn’t it.SFGbob said:Yes, yes gays are horribly oppressed here in the US. If only they lived in Iran where the worst that could happen to them was being tossed off a building as opposed to the brutal "oppression" they face here.
“You shouldn’t get mad about Pat Buchanan trying to incite an anti-gay pogrom at the ‘92 RNC, look how bad they treat gays in Iran!” -
1992? I don't recall how many gays were killed on account of that "pogrom" got a link?HardlyClothed said:
And there it is, it would be convenient for your political team if the focus was shifted off conservative christian bigotry wouldn’t it.SFGbob said:Yes, yes gays are horribly oppressed here in the US. If only they lived in Iran where the worst that could happen to them was being tossed off a building as opposed to the brutal "oppression" they face here.
“You shouldn’t get mad about Pat Buchanan trying to incite an anti-gay pogrom at the ‘92 RNC, look how bad they treat gays in Iran!” -
That playbook gets older by the day
-
I don't give two shits about gays. They're disgusting but that's what they do. The only thing the religious right wants is to keep the term marriage for traditional marriage. It is a biblical term with only one definition. Their problem is the left co-opting this into the destruction of that term specifically to harm the religious groups and sow discord. They can have all the rights of married people I don't give two shits about that, just call it something else!HardlyClothed said:
And there it is, it would be convenient for your political team if the focus was shifted off conservative christian bigotry wouldn’t it.SFGbob said:Yes, yes gays are horribly oppressed here in the US. If only they lived in Iran where the worst that could happen to them was being tossed off a building as opposed to the brutal "oppression" they face here.
“You shouldn’t get mad about Pat Buchanan trying to incite an anti-gay pogrom at the ‘92 RNC, look how bad they treat gays in Iran!” -
Bobsled “doesn’t give two shits” potd!Sledog said:
I don't give two shits about gays. They're disgusting but that's what they do. The only thing the religious right wants is to keep the term marriage for traditional marriage. It is a biblical term with only one definition. Their problem is the left co-opting this into the destruction of that term specifically to harm the religious groups and sow discord. They can have all the rights of married people I don't give two shits about that, just call it something else!HardlyClothed said:
And there it is, it would be convenient for your political team if the focus was shifted off conservative christian bigotry wouldn’t it.SFGbob said:Yes, yes gays are horribly oppressed here in the US. If only they lived in Iran where the worst that could happen to them was being tossed off a building as opposed to the brutal "oppression" they face here.
“You shouldn’t get mad about Pat Buchanan trying to incite an anti-gay pogrom at the ‘92 RNC, look how bad they treat gays in Iran!”
Bobsled supports a deep state and bloated (like trump — rofl!) government definition of “marriage.”
-
We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative -
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right?
-
If marriage is solely a biblical thing, why is the government involved? Freedom of religion kind of thing. Not to mention that you can get married by a justice of the peace. But other than that, spot on. There hasn't been any issues about baking cakes or anything else.Sledog said:
I don't give two shits about gays. They're disgusting but that's what they do. The only thing the religious right wants is to keep the term marriage for traditional marriage. It is a biblical term with only one definition. Their problem is the left co-opting this into the destruction of that term specifically to harm the religious groups and sow discord. They can have all the rights of married people I don't give two shits about that, just call it something else!HardlyClothed said:
And there it is, it would be convenient for your political team if the focus was shifted off conservative christian bigotry wouldn’t it.SFGbob said:Yes, yes gays are horribly oppressed here in the US. If only they lived in Iran where the worst that could happen to them was being tossed off a building as opposed to the brutal "oppression" they face here.
“You shouldn’t get mad about Pat Buchanan trying to incite an anti-gay pogrom at the ‘92 RNC, look how bad they treat gays in Iran!” -
Hondo, you going to back up that worthless twat of a mouth of yours?
Where have I supported Christians persecuting gay people Hondo?
-
What was fake?CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right? -
The bible defined it. It's for Adam and Eve not Bruce and Steve!CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right? -
Non-Christians marry all the time. Marriage didn’t come from the Bible.Sledog said:
The bible defined it. It's for Adam and Eve not Bruce and Steve!CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right? -
Really? Link?HHusky said:
Non-Christians marry all the time. Marriage didn’t come from the Bible.Sledog said:
The bible defined it. It's for Adam and Eve not Bruce and Steve!CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right? -
Marriage pre-dates Christianity by thousands of years. The Aboriginal people of Australia have a strong marriage tradition, a society that dates back at least 30,000 years. In China, the tradition of weddings goes back to about the third century B.C.Sledog said:
Really? Link?HHusky said:
Non-Christians marry all the time. Marriage didn’t come from the Bible.Sledog said:
The bible defined it. It's for Adam and Eve not Bruce and Steve!CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right? -
Yeah but did they sanction ghey marriage?BennyBeaver said:
Marriage pre-dates Christianity by thousands of years. The Aboriginal people of Australia have a strong marriage tradition, a society that dates back at least 30,000 years. In China, the tradition of weddings goes back to about the third century B.C.Sledog said:
Really? Link?HHusky said:
Non-Christians marry all the time. Marriage didn’t come from the Bible.Sledog said:
The bible defined it. It's for Adam and Eve not Bruce and Steve!CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right? -
Killing gays goes back just as far pre dating Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed
Why does this matter? -
Yes, but they only faced real oppression here in America from the Christian right.RaceBannon said:Killing gays goes back just as far pre dating Moses, Jesus, and Mohammed
Why does this matter? -
Stop with the wiki. We aren't aborigines and they didn't marry 2 dudes or 2 chicks either!BennyBeaver said:
Marriage pre-dates Christianity by thousands of years. The Aboriginal people of Australia have a strong marriage tradition, a society that dates back at least 30,000 years. In China, the tradition of weddings goes back to about the third century B.C.Sledog said:
Really? Link?HHusky said:
Non-Christians marry all the time. Marriage didn’t come from the Bible.Sledog said:
The bible defined it. It's for Adam and Eve not Bruce and Steve!CirrhosisDawg said:
Speaking of fake narratives...RaceBannon said:We're going to pretend that the Democrats like Clinton and Obama didn't run against gay marriage
Hurts the fake narrative
So government has no business defining marriage at all? Right?
The lefty bullshit knows no bounds!
