Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Did you guys know

124

Comments

  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    edited April 2019
    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    The debate wasn’t over whether 40 years ago you we fucking fat Eskimos O’Keefed. I’ll gladly concede that you were.

    The debate was over whether 40 years ago European standards of beauty were predominant.

    I’ll happily concede you were willing to fuck anything that would have you, but even after all your “low IQ” skirt chasing you still married a white woman.

    You’re all over the road, Lady. Have you been drinking? If yes, maybe you should stop. If no, maybe you should start.
    Go back and read what I said. 40 year ago European standards of beauty weren’t predominant.

    You thought that the fact you were fucking fat Eskimos 40 years ago refuted that statement

    You’re head is up your ass O’Keefed
    Here's what you said, blob: "Why the dodge Kunt? You’re older than me and I grew up in Seattle. Your women of color were all either injuns or Eskimos.

    Black population was tiny and you didn’t live anywhere near where they lived."

    You are weirdly bigoted toward and fixated on Eskimos. Some traumatic personal experience?

    And didn't you leave Seattle before you even went to middle school?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    HHusky said:

    SFGbob said:

    The debate wasn’t over whether 40 years ago you we fucking fat Eskimos O’Keefed. I’ll gladly concede that you were.

    The debate was over whether 40 years ago European standards of beauty were predominant.

    I’ll happily concede you were willing to fuck anything that would have you, but even after all your “low IQ” skirt chasing you still married a white woman.

    You’re all over the road, Lady. Have you been drinking? If yes, maybe you should stop. If no, maybe you should start.
    Go back and read what I said. 40 year ago European standards of beauty weren’t predominant.

    You thought that the fact you were fucking fat Eskimos 40 years ago refuted that statement

    You’re head is up your ass O’Keefed
    Here's what you said, blob: "Why the dodge Kunt? You’re older than me and I grew up in Seattle. Your women of color were all either injuns or Eskimos.

    Black population was tiny and you didn’t live anywhere near where they lived."

    You are weirdly bigoted toward and fixated on Eskimos. Some traumatic personal experience?

    And didn't you leave Seattle before you even went to middle school?
    Yet in 1970, the black population was 7% and tht Indian population was under 1%. Lil lyin Bob.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited April 2019
    There are hot women in all variety of skin colors. While what's on the shirts might have been true 40 years ago it's no longer true today and those women's problem isn't because they don't look European.


    O'Keefed - It wasn’t true 40 years ago either.

    SF - If you looked at US fashion mags like Vogue and Hollywood beauty queens it was.

    O'Keefed - Well, 40 years ago I was dating both white and non-white women. So there’s that.


    Your "evidence" that European standards of beauty weren't predominate 40 years ago was the fact that you were fucking fat Eskimos back in the day.

    The number of blacks living in Seattle doesn't refute my statement about standards of beauty 40 years ago. We were just establishing the kind of low IQ "non-white women" you were slumming with.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    There are hot women in all variety of skin colors. While what's on the shirts might have been true 40 years ago it's no longer true today and those women's problem isn't because they don't look European.


    O'Keefed - It wasn’t true 40 years ago either.

    SF - If you looked at US fashion mags like Vogue and Hollywood beauty queens it was.

    O'Keefed - Well, 40 years ago I was dating both white and non-white women. So there’s that.


    Your "evidence" that European standards of beauty weren't predominate 40 years ago was the fact that you were fucking fat Eskimos back in the day.

    The number of blacks living in Seattle doesn't refute my statement about standards of beauty 40 years ago. We were just establishing the kind of low IQ "non-white women" you were slumming with.

    So do you admit to lying about the black and Indian population in Seattle Bob?
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    So you admit you're a not very bright pathological liar who has difficulty following a conversation?


  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    So you admit you're a not very bright pathological liar who has difficulty following a conversation?


    Lil lyin Bob.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    Hmmm, you are a pathological liar and you do appear to have great difficulty following the conversation. Statements of fact.


  • HHusky
    HHusky Member Posts: 24,363
    The most interesting aspect of this discussion is blob’s apparent animus toward Indians and Eskimos. Weird.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Terrible thread. Just the worst.
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    HHusky said:

    The most interesting aspect of this discussion is blob’s apparent animus toward Indians and Eskimos. Weird.

    Animus? No. As I said:

    just establishing the kind of low IQ "non-white women" you were slumming with.

    Now how does the fact that you were fucking fat natives refute the fact that 40 years ago European standards of beauty were predominate?

    Cue the jackass dance.