Welp they are taking the bait
Comments
-
It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
-
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
-
I believe he meant to say they think their base is dumb because they areHHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
-
Playing right into Donald’s 2020 Straight Flush
-
I’m sure that’s what he meant now that you clarified his words for him. Grundle can attest.RaceBannon said:
I believe he meant to say they think their base is dumb because they areHHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
It’s been a difficult 48 hours for trumptards. -
Mullertard said what?CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure that’s what he meant now that you clarified his words for him. Grundle can attest.RaceBannon said:
I believe he meant to say they think their base is dumb because they areHHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
It’s been a difficult 48 hours for trumptards.
Collusion
Obstruction
Impeachment
All on the table?????? -
Calm down, turbo.RaceBannon said:
Mullertard said what?CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure that’s what he meant now that you clarified his words for him. Grundle can attest.RaceBannon said:
I believe he meant to say they think their base is dumb because they areHHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
It’s been a difficult 48 hours for trumptards.
Collusion
Obstruction
Impeachment
All on the table??????
Lipo. -
If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
-
CirrhosisDawg said:
Calm down, turbo.RaceBannon said:
Mullertard said what?CirrhosisDawg said:
I’m sure that’s what he meant now that you clarified his words for him. Grundle can attest.RaceBannon said:
I believe he meant to say they think their base is dumb because they areHHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
It’s been a difficult 48 hours for trumptards.
Collusion
Obstruction
Impeachment
All on the table??????
Lipo.
-
Well the public is dumb. Really dumb.HHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
-
Yeeup.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
-
Cost the House in 98 I thinkYellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
-
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
-
HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop
-
How bad is Mueller that after 2 years and a full report stuff still needs to come out? When will Schiff release his PROOF?
-
Why so agitated? You think the report is good for Daddy, right?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop -
HHusky said:
Why so agitated?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop
-
I will not stand idly by and let you criticize Bill Barr’s redactions!RaceBannon said:How bad is Mueller that after 2 years and a full report stuff still needs to come out? When will Schiff release his PROOF?
-
Weren't you just in another thread saying there wasn't a meeting at Trump tower with the Russians?RaceBannon said:
I believe he meant to say they think their base is dumb because they areHHusky said:
I get how seeking impeachment may be a dumb strategy by the Democrats, but how does this impeachment movement show the Democrats think the public is dumb?pawz said:It never ceases to amaze how the Democrats think the general public are dumb as a pile of rocks. Like we? need their salvation.....
-
You think its bad right? You just can't explain how.HHusky said:
Why so agitated? You think the report is good for Daddy, right?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop
-
Or you could just read it and let your heart swell with pride at how our noble king has conducted himself.RaceBannon said:
You think its bad right? You just can't explain how.HHusky said:
Why so agitated? You think the report is good for Daddy, right?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop -
Now you like polls.RaceBannon said:
You think its bad right? You just can't explain how.HHusky said:
Why so agitated? You think the report is good for Daddy, right?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop -
Yeah I know but I need the secret decoder ring to see where Muelller said there was collusion because no one thinks he did say that other than Team Hondo
I think Trump did fine considering the array of bullshit that was brought against him. He's a contractor and we tend to blow off steam and say shit when attacked. Good think thoughts aren't a crime yet.
Trump fired Comey. If its obstruction then fucking indict him
Who turned Mueller to the dark side? -
The meltdown is spectacular.RaceBannon said:Yeah I know but I need the secret decoder ring to see where Muelller said there was collusion because no one thinks he did say that other than Team Hondo
I think Trump did fine considering the array of bullshit that was brought against him. He's a contractor and we tend to blow off steam and say shit when attacked. Good think thoughts aren't a crime yet.
Trump fired Comey. If its obstruction then fucking indict him
Who turned Mueller to the dark side? -
Link?2001400ex said:
Now you like polls.RaceBannon said:
You think its bad right? You just can't explain how.HHusky said:
Why so agitated? You think the report is good for Daddy, right?RaceBannon said:HHusky said:
Absolutely. Politically it would be much smarter just to roll the cards out one by one. It seems unlikely that new information, as it comes out, is going to make Daddy look better.YellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
Yes keep it coming. Trump is getting shredded by this stuff. Don't stop -
Not being indicted is the new test for admirable behavior. What standards?RaceBannon said:Yeah I know but I need the secret decoder ring to see where Muelller said there was collusion because no one thinks he did say that other than Team Hondo
I think Trump did fine considering the array of bullshit that was brought against him. He's a contractor and we tend to blow off steam and say shit when attacked. Good think thoughts aren't a crime yet.
Trump fired Comey. If its obstruction then fucking indict him
Who turned Mueller to the dark side? -
(AllPolitics, December 20) -- In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.
That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had.
At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP.
Despite concerns that public calls for Clinton's resignation would rise after his impeachment, the number of Americans who want Clinton to resign has remained statistically unchanged. Only 30 percent want Clinton to resign; only 29 percent want the Senate to convict Clinton and remove him from office.
The poll, released Sunday, also shows that 35 percent approve of the House's decision to impeach the president.
Interviews with 852 adult Americans were conducted December 19-20, after the House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton. -
Its actually a test and an old one for the ability to accuse someone of committing a crimeHHusky said:
Not being indicted is the new test for admirable behavior. What standards?RaceBannon said:Yeah I know but I need the secret decoder ring to see where Muelller said there was collusion because no one thinks he did say that other than Team Hondo
I think Trump did fine considering the array of bullshit that was brought against him. He's a contractor and we tend to blow off steam and say shit when attacked. Good think thoughts aren't a crime yet.
Trump fired Comey. If its obstruction then fucking indict him
Who turned Mueller to the dark side?
I pity your clients -
GOP maintained control of the house after 1998. But they had a lackluster showing and lost 4 seats.RaceBannon said:
Cost the House in 98 I thinkYellowSnow said:If history teaches us anything on the subject, it's that it's a waste of time to impeach if you don't have the votes in the Senate. When Barry went to see Nixon in Aug '74 he new a Senate conviction was likely. As much as I rooted for BJ conviction in 1998 it probably wasn't a wise move politically.
-
I think you’re preaching to choir.RaceBannon said:(AllPolitics, December 20) -- In the wake of the House of Representatives' approval of two articles of impeachment, Bill Clinton's approval rating has jumped 10 points to 73 percent, the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll shows.
That's not only an all-time high for Clinton, it also beats the highest approval rating President Ronald Reagan ever had.
At the same time, the number of Americans with an unfavorable view of the Republican Party has jumped 10 points; less than a third of the country now has a favorable view of the GOP.
Despite concerns that public calls for Clinton's resignation would rise after his impeachment, the number of Americans who want Clinton to resign has remained statistically unchanged. Only 30 percent want Clinton to resign; only 29 percent want the Senate to convict Clinton and remove him from office.
The poll, released Sunday, also shows that 35 percent approve of the House's decision to impeach the president.
Interviews with 852 adult Americans were conducted December 19-20, after the House of Representatives voted to impeach Clinton.
