San Diego Union Tribune hasn't endorsed a democrat for president in 148 years, until today
Comments
-
@CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg said:
Polls show trump with decent chance of winning, lol. He's behind, fighting to fend off landslide numbers at this point. And he's fallen even farther behind in the two weeks since these endorsements started coming out. There you go again (every post) with that poorly educated white trash schtick.greenblood said:
The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.OZONE said:
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.greenblood said:Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
Didn't take very long. -
This thread shows me that Hondo is the same lying piece of crap now as he was then.
-
Care to point to the lie?SFGbob said:This thread shows me that Hondo is the same lying piece of crap now as he was then.
-
Can I point at it with a gun?
-
That didn’t age wellOZONE said:
Unless some major revelation comes out between now and election day, I don't see it happening. I think Clinton's team knows which states she needs to win, to take the electoral college, and she will win all of those, and a few more.PurpleThrobber said:
I won't disagree with your breakdown - it's a fairly accurate if not hurtful generalization.OZONE said:
I'd say it breaks down roughly like this (the % below are of the Trump voting block):Tequilla said:
That's obvious ...OZONE said:
It says that Trump is such a fucktard, these organizations are willing to endorse a (D) to prevent him from getting close to the White House.Tequilla said:So let me see if I have this right ...
There are a boatload of companies, media, agencies, etc. that RARELY endorse a Presidential candidate but are in this election ...
The person that seemingly all of these people are endorsing is in a tight race with this person that is considered by so many to be unqualified for the job ...
What does that say about the other person in the race?
Great question.
But what I'm getting at is that if Trump was THAT bad why are 40-45% of the voting population dead set on voting for him?
Have you considered that to a large percentage of our population Hillary is viewed just as unfavorably and dangerous as Trump is by the other half of the population?
25% will never vote (D) no matter what
25% will never vote for a woman, no matter what
25% hate blacks and view her as the husband of our first black prez, and SoS of our 2nd black prez
25% live in mobile homes and read the National Enquirer and watched The Apprentice on their "console TV sets" and are voting Trump because he is the only politician whose name they can remember
But do the maff - Trump only has to snag a couple more percentage points out of the remainder who don't fall into that generalization and he's living in the White House.
Trump will go back to hosting a TV show loved by the National Enquirer crowd. -
MICHAEL BUMP CITY BUMPUSCirrhosisDawg said:
Polls show trump with decent chance of winning, lol. He's behind, fighting to fend off landslide numbers at this point. And he's fallen even farther behind in the two weeks since these endorsements started coming out. There you go again (every post) with that poorly educated white trash schtick.greenblood said:
The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.OZONE said:
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.greenblood said:Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda. -
And CD has always been a mouthy dumfuck
-
@CirrhosisDawg is mouthy but not a dumb fuck.SFGbob said:And CD has always been a mouthy dumfuck
-
FixedTierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's a lot of poor white trash in HillsboroTequilla said:
That's obvious ...OZONE said:
It says that Trump is such a fucktard, these organizations are willing to endorse a (D) to prevent him from getting close to the White House.Tequilla said:So let me see if I have this right ...
There are a boatload of companies, media, agencies, etc. that RARELY endorse a Presidential candidate but are in this election ...
The person that seemingly all of these people are endorsing is in a tight race with this person that is considered by so many to be unqualified for the job ...
What does that say about the other person in the race?
Great question.
But what I'm getting at is that if Trump was THAT bad why are 40-45% of the voting population dead set on voting for him?
Have you considered that to a large percentage of our population Hillary is viewed just as unfavorably and dangerous as Trump is by the other half of the population?America.
Hope this helps.
-
How'd that endorsement work out?
-
Anyone who claims Banks can foreclose on people even when they're current on their mortgages is a dumbfuck.YellowSnow said: -
I'd need to see the quote and the context.SFGbob said:
Anyone who claims Banks can foreclose on people even when they're current on their mortgages is a dumbfuck.YellowSnow said: -
Bob doesn't believe in context. He was just arguing with you that low income people don't pay any federal income tax. And ignored your comments that they do pay payroll taxes (and fuel tax, cigarette and alcohol taxes).YellowSnow said:
I'd need to see the quote and the context.SFGbob said:
Anyone who claims Banks can foreclose on people even when they're current on their mortgages is a dumbfuck.YellowSnow said: -
Hondo likes to lie out his ass. How did I ignore it Hondo? Do you think I'm unaware that low income people pay sales taxes dumbfuck?2001400ex said:
Bob doesn't believe in context. He was just arguing with you that low income people don't pay any federal income tax. And ignored your comments that they do pay payroll taxes (and fuel tax, cigarette and alcohol taxes).YellowSnow said:
I'd need to see the quote and the context.SFGbob said:
Anyone who claims Banks can foreclose on people even when they're current on their mortgages is a dumbfuck.YellowSnow said:
Hondo I realize that you're a fucking moron who doesn't even know that Medicare adds to the national debt but you shouldn't assume everyone else is a dumbfuck like you. -
HUH???????MikeDamone said:
There's a lot of poor white trash in Hillsboro.
Hope this helps.
-
Fixed it for ya.SFGbob said:And CD has always been a mouthy dum cuck.
-
Whoever brought this thread back up I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart. It is a classic!OZONE said:
Don't know if you've heard, but Clinton just took the lead in Arizona.greenblood said:
The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.OZONE said:
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.greenblood said:Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
Maybe you are only looking at the polls that Trump tweets out at 3am?
"Trump is Hugo Chavez", "Clinton just took the lead in Arizona".........priceless. -
I dunno. The Throbber is fresh as a daisy.MikeDamone said:
That didn’t age wellOZONE said:
Unless some major revelation comes out between now and election day, I don't see it happening. I think Clinton's team knows which states she needs to win, to take the electoral college, and she will win all of those, and a few more.PurpleThrobber said:
I won't disagree with your breakdown - it's a fairly accurate if not hurtful generalization.OZONE said:
I'd say it breaks down roughly like this (the % below are of the Trump voting block):Tequilla said:
That's obvious ...OZONE said:
It says that Trump is such a fucktard, these organizations are willing to endorse a (D) to prevent him from getting close to the White House.Tequilla said:So let me see if I have this right ...
There are a boatload of companies, media, agencies, etc. that RARELY endorse a Presidential candidate but are in this election ...
The person that seemingly all of these people are endorsing is in a tight race with this person that is considered by so many to be unqualified for the job ...
What does that say about the other person in the race?
Great question.
But what I'm getting at is that if Trump was THAT bad why are 40-45% of the voting population dead set on voting for him?
Have you considered that to a large percentage of our population Hillary is viewed just as unfavorably and dangerous as Trump is by the other half of the population?
25% will never vote (D) no matter what
25% will never vote for a woman, no matter what
25% hate blacks and view her as the husband of our first black prez, and SoS of our 2nd black prez
25% live in mobile homes and read the National Enquirer and watched The Apprentice on their "console TV sets" and are voting Trump because he is the only politician whose name they can remember
But do the maff - Trump only has to snag a couple more percentage points out of the remainder who don't fall into that generalization and he's living in the White House.
Trump will go back to hosting a TV show loved by the National Enquirer crowd. -
OZONE said:
You mad bros?
OZONE said:
Huh? You are suggesting the editors of the vast majority of the nations news papers are paid to deceive?Fenderbender123 said:So people who get paid to deceive and manipulate don't want Trump to be president. Got it.
Sounds like a conspiracy theory.
Good think we have the National Enquirer to save us...OZONE said:
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.greenblood said:Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.OZONE said:
Don't know if you've heard, but Clinton just took the lead in Arizona.greenblood said:
The reason for these endorsements OZONE is that most of these publications were never with Trump, they just never thought he had a chance. But since polls show Trump actually has a decent chance of winning, they are in panic mode and grasping at straws to change the public's mind.OZONE said:
I don't think it will affect voting. I think it is a good predictor of the mood of the nation. And the mood is that Trump is such a huge dumbfuck that everybody who is anybody is against him.greenblood said:Does Ozone realize that the more the media endorses Clinton, the more it helps Trump right?
This would be great news for Ozone, if this campaign followed traditional rules. People trust the media less than they trust either of these candidates. During this campaign, a media endorsement of Hillary Clinton is worth nothing.
The media hasn't represented to voice of the people for years. They are just like any other business. There are a couple of influential bodies that push their agenda.
Maybe you are only looking at the polls that Trump tweets out at 3am?