Real Unemployment 37.2%, Real Misery Index 14, 20% on Food Stamps...
People in Middlebury, Vermont are clueless to what's going on.
washingtonexaminer.com/wall-street-advisor-actual-unemployment-is-37.2-misery-index-worst-in-40-years/article/2542604
cnsnews.com/news/article/ali-meyer/record-20-households-food-stamps-2013
Comments
-
This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
-
Have you looked at the stock market lately!!!oregonblitzkrieg said:This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
-
No one gives a fuck about the poor.
Hope this helps. -
The world has gone mad, again. Reality will catch up eventually and we'll be seeing fat Goldman Sachs bastards jumping out of NY skyscraper windows with plungers stuck deep up their asses.MikeDamone said:
Have you looked at the stock market lately!!!oregonblitzkrieg said:This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
-
"lol"
-
I believe Damone whooshed you but your sentiments are correct. The rigged stock market is not a good indicator of overall welfare. Then unemployment rates the gubermint gives are about 15-20 points off.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The world has gone mad, again. Reality will catch up eventually and we'll be seeing fat Goldman Sachs bastards jumping out of NY skyscraper windows with plungers stuck deep up their asses.MikeDamone said:
Have you looked at the stock market lately!!!oregonblitzkrieg said:This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
-
I gave him an up vote for his whoosh attempt.DugtheDoog said:
I believe Damone whooshed youoregonblitzkrieg said:
The world has gone mad, again. Reality will catch up eventually and we'll be seeing fat Goldman Sachs bastards jumping out of NY skyscraper windows with plungers stuck deep up their asses.MikeDamone said:
Have you looked at the stock market lately!!!oregonblitzkrieg said:This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
-
Printing money does wonderful things for inflation and stock prices.MikeDamone said:
Have you looked at the stock market lately!!!oregonblitzkrieg said:This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
"Finance is my wheelhouse." I heard that somewhere.
-
how can finance be in your wheelhouse? thought you went to public school ... because of the Whitman thing.death2ducks said:
Printing money does wonderful things for inflation and stock prices.MikeDamone said:
Have you looked at the stock market lately!!!oregonblitzkrieg said:This is a far more believable figure than the propaganda those fucks in government are trying to spoon feed us. They actually think we believe their shit that we're in a recovery and not in the great depression part 2.
"Finance is my wheelhouse." I heard that somewhere. -
-
Fuck are we in another wave of the red scare?
If we don't vote for Tea Party bigots we're gonna fall into communism!!!!11!1!1 -
The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
-
-
Well we know who is in charge of the Jesus_Christ handle.
-
Hi Harv!CuntWaffle said:Well we know who is in charge of the Jesus_Christ handle.
-
The devil made me do itCuntWaffle said:Well we know who is in charge of the Jesus_Christ handle.
-
You think you know, but you don't.TierbsHsotBoobs said: -
Fremont
The tea party is racist. Everyone says so -
First part wrong.DeepPurple said:The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
The rest wrong. 1980? You obviously weren't there. Reagan took over with interest rates at 23.5% PRIME RATE. But now 30 years later, revisionists blame that recession on Reagan?
-
Prove the first part wrong. When has unemployment NOT been reported that way in the US? Ever take a course in Econ?death2ducks said:
First part wrong.DeepPurple said:The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
The rest wrong. 1980? You obviously weren't there. Reagan took over with interest rates at 23.5% PRIME RATE. But now 30 years later, revisionists blame that recession on Reagan?
/>
Oh... so it was the fault of the guy before Reagan? Thought blaming the previous guy wasn't allowed?
-
Reagan fixed the mess he was left. Obama exacerbated the mess he was leftDeepPurple said:
Prove the first part wrong. When has unemployment NOT been reported that way in the US? Ever take a course in Econ?death2ducks said:
First part wrong.DeepPurple said:The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
The rest wrong. 1980? You obviously weren't there. Reagan took over with interest rates at 23.5% PRIME RATE. But now 30 years later, revisionists blame that recession on Reagan?
/>
Oh... so it was the fault of the guy before Reagan? Thought blaming the previous guy wasn't allowed?
Some of you need to learn the difference -
Disagree. Obama hasn't fixed things as well as Reagan did, but things are clearly better now than they were five years ago.RaceBannon said:
Reagan fixed the mess he was left. Obama exacerbated the mess he was leftDeepPurple said:
Prove the first part wrong. When has unemployment NOT been reported that way in the US? Ever take a course in Econ?death2ducks said:
First part wrong.DeepPurple said:The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
The rest wrong. 1980? You obviously weren't there. Reagan took over with interest rates at 23.5% PRIME RATE. But now 30 years later, revisionists blame that recession on Reagan?
/>
Oh... so it was the fault of the guy before Reagan? Thought blaming the previous guy wasn't allowed?
Some of you need to learn the difference -
Sark was better than ty more than things are better now. Obama hasn't fixed anything and obamacare is a time bombTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree. Obama hasn't fixed things as well as Reagan did, but things are clearly better now than they were five years ago.RaceBannon said:
Reagan fixed the mess he was left. Obama exacerbated the mess he was leftDeepPurple said:
Prove the first part wrong. When has unemployment NOT been reported that way in the US? Ever take a course in Econ?death2ducks said:
First part wrong.DeepPurple said:The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
The rest wrong. 1980? You obviously weren't there. Reagan took over with interest rates at 23.5% PRIME RATE. But now 30 years later, revisionists blame that recession on Reagan?
/>
Oh... so it was the fault of the guy before Reagan? Thought blaming the previous guy wasn't allowed?
Some of you need to learn the difference -
W left a much bigger and more complex mess than C. Some of you need to understand scale a magnitude.RaceBannon said:
Reagan fixed the mess he was left. Obama exacerbated the mess he was left
Some of you need to learn the difference -
Some of you need to have been alive in the late 70s. That is a ridiculous statement
-
-
My investment portfolio and I shared a good laugh together after reading this post.RaceBannon said:
Sark was better than ty more than things are better now. Obama hasn't fixed anything and obamacare is a time bombTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Disagree. Obama hasn't fixed things as well as Reagan did, but things are clearly better now than they were five years ago.RaceBannon said:
Reagan fixed the mess he was left. Obama exacerbated the mess he was leftDeepPurple said:
Prove the first part wrong. When has unemployment NOT been reported that way in the US? Ever take a course in Econ?death2ducks said:
First part wrong.DeepPurple said:The US has always measured unemployment in terms of unemployment claims rather than in terms of those out of work -- it is the same gimmick that was used in the early 80s to make unemployment during the Reagan recession look lower than it really was... both parties play this trick because at the end of the day, they are both just shills for the land holding corporate aristocracy that wants the common man to think that things here aren't as bad as they are in France or Italy.
The rest wrong. 1980? You obviously weren't there. Reagan took over with interest rates at 23.5% PRIME RATE. But now 30 years later, revisionists blame that recession on Reagan?
/>
Oh... so it was the fault of the guy before Reagan? Thought blaming the previous guy wasn't allowed?
Some of you need to learn the difference -
Stocks were high under Bush as well. And they will be low under Obama before he is done. That is not the economy
-
I should have included my paycheck as well. THIS economy only sucks if you have no skills. It's a Republican dream.RaceBannon said:Stocks were high under Bush as well. And they will be low under Obama before he is done. That is not the economy
-
I'm sure all the folks that Obama is fucking are happy for you
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
