Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The real collusion

24567

Comments

  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    edited April 2019
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Amgreatness is the new tin foil hat website now. Zero hedge and Brietbart aren’t far enough out there for you.

    What was the news source you used for this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump

    You've got no fucking business giving anyone else shit about tin foil hat websites you pathological lying piece of shit.

    Fox news.
    Fox News never made that claim pathological liar. "Dirt on Hillary" doesn't = a "documented fact" that the Russians offered Trump stolen and hacked materials. But you're a fucking liar and you claim it does. That's what pathological liars do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Amgreatness is the new tin foil hat website now. Zero hedge and Brietbart aren’t far enough out there for you.

    What was the news source you used for this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump

    You've got no fucking business giving anyone else shit about tin foil hat websites you pathological lying piece of shit.

    Fox news.
    Fox News never made that claim pathological liar. "Dirt on Hillary" doesn't = a "documented fact" that the Russians offered Trump stolen and hacked materials. But you're a fucking liar and you claim it does. That's what pathological liars do.
    Bob still isn't smart enough to put 2 and 2 together. Yet rails on DNC emails showing Hillary colluded with the DNC.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,188
    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Amgreatness is the new tin foil hat website now. Zero hedge and Brietbart aren’t far enough out there for you.

    What was the news source you used for this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump

    You've got no fucking business giving anyone else shit about tin foil hat websites you pathological lying piece of shit.

    Fox news.
    Fox News never made that claim pathological liar. "Dirt on Hillary" doesn't = a "documented fact" that the Russians offered Trump stolen and hacked materials. But you're a fucking liar and you claim it does. That's what pathological liars do.
    Bob still isn't smart enough to put 2 and 2 together. Yet rails on DNC emails showing Hillary colluded with the DNC.
    I've never claimed that the DNC's emails show Hillary colluded with the DNC you pathological lying piece of shit. And why should anyone have to put something together in order to come to the same conclusion you did Hondo when you claimed that it was already a "documented fact" that the Russians were offering Trump hacked DNC and Hillary emails? Why was no one ever charged with this crime you lying worthless piece of shit?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    SFGbob said:

    2001400ex said:

    Amgreatness is the new tin foil hat website now. Zero hedge and Brietbart aren’t far enough out there for you.

    What was the news source you used for this Hondo?

    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump

    You've got no fucking business giving anyone else shit about tin foil hat websites you pathological lying piece of shit.

    Fox news.
    Fox News never made that claim pathological liar. "Dirt on Hillary" doesn't = a "documented fact" that the Russians offered Trump stolen and hacked materials. But you're a fucking liar and you claim it does. That's what pathological liars do.
    Bob still isn't smart enough to put 2 and 2 together. Yet rails on DNC emails showing Hillary colluded with the DNC.
    I've never claimed that the DNC's emails show Hillary colluded with the DNC you pathological lying piece of shit. And why should anyone have to put something together in order to come to the same conclusion you did Hondo when you claimed that it was already a "documented fact" that the Russians were offering Trump hacked DNC and Hillary emails? Why was no one ever charged with this crime you lying worthless piece of shit?
    Like trump said multiple times today, we have to look at the oranges of this calamity. Who would disagree?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,684
    Legal or not we've gotta go after the Dems. Indefinite detention sounds about right. If you dig deep enough you'll find something that sticks. And if it doesn't, make it up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    edited April 2019
    This is an unresolved matter unless and until the House receives the complete unredacted report being blocked by Trumps AG
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,653 Founders Club
    ApostleofGrief said:

    This is an unresolved matter unless and until the House receives the complete unredacted report being blocked by Trumps AG

    No hope
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    ApostleofGrief said:

    This is an unresolved matter unless and until the House receives the complete unredacted report being blocked by Trumps AG

    Nadler in 1998: Of course you can’t release grand-jury testimony in prosecutor’s report

    Nothing is more consistent about partisan warfare in the Beltway than inconsistency. Today’s case in point comes from 1998 (and from Jeff Dunetz), when House Judiciary Committee member Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) objected to the idea that everything found by an independent prosecutor should get published for all to see. Nadler told Charlie Rose that Ken Starr’s report might contain “all kinds of material that it would be unfair to release,” including “statements which may or may not be true by various witnesses.” Besides, Nadler argued at the time, releasing grand-jury material violated federal law.


    Yes, I know you were talking about the House receiving it. But still.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    RaceBannon said:

    ApostleofGrief said:

    This is an unresolved matter unless and until the House receives the complete unredacted report being blocked by Trumps AG

    No hope
    Did we give up when the Germans invaded Pearl Harbor?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter