Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Imagine

2001400ex
2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
"Imagine if the Starr report had been provided only to President Clinton's attorney general, Janet Reno, who then read it privately and published a 4 page letter based on her private reading stating that her conclusion was that president Clinton committed no crimes."
«13

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,876 Founders Club
    Great talking point from Monica

    Even Starr ultimately agreed the old law should go. So did Janet Reno, Clinton’s Attorney General at the time. During Congressional hearings about the rules in the spring of 1999, Reno called big final reports a “problem.”

    “We believe that information obtained during a criminal investigation should, in most all cases, be made public only if there is an indictment and prosecution, not in lengthy and detailed reports filed after a decision has been made not to prosecute,” Reno told Congress at the time. “The final report provides a forum for unfairly airing a target’s dirty laundry…. We have come to believe that the price of the final report is often too high.”
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Great talking point from Monica

    Even Starr ultimately agreed the old law should go. So did Janet Reno, Clinton’s Attorney General at the time. During Congressional hearings about the rules in the spring of 1999, Reno called big final reports a “problem.”

    “We believe that information obtained during a criminal investigation should, in most all cases, be made public only if there is an indictment and prosecution, not in lengthy and detailed reports filed after a decision has been made not to prosecute,” Reno told Congress at the time. “The final report provides a forum for unfairly airing a target’s dirty laundry…. We have come to believe that the price of the final report is often too high.”

    Race got his talking points memo today.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    LebamDawg said:

    now I see why @Swaye has two threads just on you

    Triggered
  • SFGbob
    SFGbob Member Posts: 33,204
    edited March 2019
    2001400ex said:

    "Imagine if the Starr report had been provided only to President Clinton's attorney general, Janet Reno, who then read it privately and published a 4 page letter based on her private reading stating that her conclusion was that president Clinton committed no crimes."

    The report will be released Hondo. It's not as if the facts in the case will stop you from lying about it anyway.


    And it's a documented fact that Trump's team met with a Russian team to discuss giving DNC emails and Hillary emails to Trump.



  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,876 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Great talking point from Monica

    Even Starr ultimately agreed the old law should go. So did Janet Reno, Clinton’s Attorney General at the time. During Congressional hearings about the rules in the spring of 1999, Reno called big final reports a “problem.”

    “We believe that information obtained during a criminal investigation should, in most all cases, be made public only if there is an indictment and prosecution, not in lengthy and detailed reports filed after a decision has been made not to prosecute,” Reno told Congress at the time. “The final report provides a forum for unfairly airing a target’s dirty laundry…. We have come to believe that the price of the final report is often too high.”

    Race got his talking points memo today.
    You posted a talking point that was all over Google thanks to Monica saying it

    I replied with Janet Reno explaining why the law changed and the report isn't just dumped.

    You're a pathological liar

    And if you insult Janet Reno you're gone. No warning just gone
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited March 2019
    2001400ex said:

    "Imagine if the Starr report had been provided only to President Clinton's attorney general, Janet Reno, who then read it privately and published a 4 page letter based on her private reading stating that her conclusion was that president Clinton committed no crimes."

    But but but..

    And if Reno would have done that, she would have been right.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Great talking point from Monica

    Even Starr ultimately agreed the old law should go. So did Janet Reno, Clinton’s Attorney General at the time. During Congressional hearings about the rules in the spring of 1999, Reno called big final reports a “problem.”

    “We believe that information obtained during a criminal investigation should, in most all cases, be made public only if there is an indictment and prosecution, not in lengthy and detailed reports filed after a decision has been made not to prosecute,” Reno told Congress at the time. “The final report provides a forum for unfairly airing a target’s dirty laundry…. We have come to believe that the price of the final report is often too high.”

    Race got his talking points memo today.
    You posted a talking point that was all over Google thanks to Monica saying it

    I replied with Janet Reno explaining why the law changed and the report isn't just dumped.

    You're a pathological liar

    And if you insult Janet Reno you're gone. No warning just gone
    You sound angry. And Monica didn't say that. HTH

    I do appreciate your fast, well thought out, independent rebuttal tho.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,876 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    Great talking point from Monica

    Even Starr ultimately agreed the old law should go. So did Janet Reno, Clinton’s Attorney General at the time. During Congressional hearings about the rules in the spring of 1999, Reno called big final reports a “problem.”

    “We believe that information obtained during a criminal investigation should, in most all cases, be made public only if there is an indictment and prosecution, not in lengthy and detailed reports filed after a decision has been made not to prosecute,” Reno told Congress at the time. “The final report provides a forum for unfairly airing a target’s dirty laundry…. We have come to believe that the price of the final report is often too high.”

    Race got his talking points memo today.
    You posted a talking point that was all over Google thanks to Monica saying it

    I replied with Janet Reno explaining why the law changed and the report isn't just dumped.

    You're a pathological liar

    And if you insult Janet Reno you're gone. No warning just gone
    You sound angry. And Monica didn't say that. HTH

    I do appreciate your fast, well thought out, independent rebuttal tho.
    Pathological liar

    The law was changed after the Star report


  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,876 Founders Club
    Imagine living life as a lying piece of shit like hondo