ESPN offered, PAC 12 "No thanks"
Comments
-
LebamDawg said:
Not ACC - AAC, here is the membershipdirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott
</blockquote
That's conference looks tougher than ours on the gridirion. Don't believe me just ask Mississippi Mustache -
Yikes... readings tough. aac aside, can we still fire Larry?LebamDawg said:
Not ACC - AAC, here is the membershipdirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott -
dirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott
