ESPN offered, PAC 12 "No thanks"
my links have not been working
Comments
-
Curious what the timeline is on this. If they said no in 2011 then it's old news. If this took place last fall, someone needs to burn the P12 headquarters.
-
lest we forget Aaron Levine is not shying away from trying to take down Larry Scott.LebamDawg said:Aaron Levine tweeted this
my links have not been working
-
The article was from March 25thUWhuskytskeet said:Curious what the timeline is on this. If they said no in 2011 then it's old news. If this took place last fall, someone needs to burn the P12 headquarters.
https://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2019/03/25/Colleges/Pac12.aspx -
The Pac 12 said no = Champagne Larry said no
FTG. -
I'm hearing he said no because the kickoff times were too early.
-
You mean 12:30pm Pacific? On a Saturday?joeEDangerously said:I'm hearing he said no because the kickoff times were too early.
-
youuuu love himDoog_de_Jour said:The Pac 12 said no = Champagne Larry said no
FTG. -
What a fucking asshole.
FTG with plunger lined with razor blades. -
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott -
Not ACC - AAC, here is the membershipdirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott
-
LebamDawg said:
Not ACC - AAC, here is the membershipdirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott
</blockquote
That's conference looks tougher than ours on the gridirion. Don't believe me just ask Mississippi Mustache -
Yikes... readings tough. aac aside, can we still fire Larry?LebamDawg said:
Not ACC - AAC, here is the membershipdirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott -
dirtysouwfdawg said:
So this is the ACC’s deal. Pac-12’s deal would have been 3 billion over 12yrs.
What the fuck am I so naive and green about that I’m missing what’s going on?
We’re absolute shit compared to the ACC sports wise (consider b-ball as well) yet we had an offer for 3x there deal?
WTF... why is no one over turning Larry, Can’t the AD’s step in and stop this madness.
My bi-polar can’t handle the ups and downs of contract negotiations.
#firelarryscott
