Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Developing story

2

Comments

  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,690
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Exonerated by Mueller of collusion charges.
    No charges by Mueller regarding obstruction, left to the AG.
    AG determines evidence of obstruction is insufficient. No charges by AG of obstruction. Obstruction charge is cleared. Some call that exoneration. Other don't. Irregardless, no charges of obstruction.

    What am I missing?

    Uh....that the real report says the exact opposite, recommends trump be indicted, and McConnell is covering it up.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Pitchfork51 said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Exonerated by Mueller of collusion charges.
    No charges by Mueller regarding obstruction, left to the AG.
    AG determines evidence of obstruction is insufficient. No charges by AG of obstruction. Obstruction charge is cleared. Some call that exoneration. Other don't. Irregardless, no charges of obstruction.

    What am I missing?

    Uh....that the real report says the exact opposite, recommends trump be indicted, and McConnell is covering it up.

    Is that what Fox News is telling you?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    Does the analysis really have to descend to this level of stupidity? Apparently so. Barr’s summary of Mueller’s report on obstruction:

    “While this report does not conclude the presidential committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,802 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Does the analysis really have to descend to this level of stupidity? Apparently so. Barr’s summary of Mueller’s report on obstruction:

    “While this report does not conclude the presidential committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”


    That's part of the story and has been addressed

    If you want to make your stand on it go ahead

    What a great day to be a white trash Trumpanzee Trumptard unable to compete in America man
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Does the analysis really have to descend to this level of stupidity? Apparently so. Barr’s summary of Mueller’s report on obstruction:

    “While this report does not conclude the presidential committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”


    That's part of the story and has been addressed

    If you want to make your stand on it go ahead

    What a great day to be a white trash Trumpanzee Trumptard unable to compete in America man
    Or read a report. Don forget that. All of which is apparently true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    Exonerated by Mueller of collusion charges.
    No charges by Mueller regarding obstruction, left to the AG.
    AG determines evidence of obstruction is insufficient. No charges by AG of obstruction. Obstruction charge is cleared. Some call that exoneration. Other don't. Irregardless, no charges of obstruction.

    What am I missing?

    GrundleStiltzkin doesn’t really care about this. Either way. Potd!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Does the analysis really have to descend to this level of stupidity? Apparently so. Barr’s summary of Mueller’s report on obstruction:

    “While this report does not conclude the presidential committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”


    Yes? You keep at this like there's a real controversy. There is a difference between exoneration by Mueller and no conclusion, certainly. Without subsequent charges by the AG, I think it's a difference without distinction. Trump isn't being charged by either, and there it ends.

    Quite honestly, Mitch, I'm surprised they couldn't get an obstruction charge on Trump. That's seems to be the fallback charge in any federal investigation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,718 Standard Supporter


    Too much legal mumbo jumbo.

    And you wonder why I just post #marriedintojoobs pics?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,802 Founders Club
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    Does the analysis really have to descend to this level of stupidity? Apparently so. Barr’s summary of Mueller’s report on obstruction:

    “While this report does not conclude the presidential committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”


    Yes? You keep at this like there's a real controversy. There is a difference between exoneration by Mueller and no conclusion, certainly. Without subsequent charges by the AG, I think it's a difference without distinction. Trump isn't being charged by either, and there it ends.

    Quite honestly, Mitch, I'm surprised they couldn't get an obstruction charge on Trump. That's seems to be the fallback charge in any federal investigation.
    Pretty sure that once Mueller saw what a steaming pile he was handed that was his only hope

    But tweeting that your innocent and baiting Mueller isn't obstruction

    The only hope was that Trump would fire Mueller. While you can argue whether that is obstruction it would give Yellow the issue he is looking for

    Trump didn't bite
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter