Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Science update
RaceBannon
Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,573
in Tug Tavern
https://thebrooklyninstitute.com/items/courses/science-race-colonialism/
At first glance, the work of science seems to provide empirically-grounded, universal explanations of natural and cultural phenomena. Yet as historians, anthropologists, and philosophers of science contend, such an understanding is at odds with the actual history of science, a history littered with racialized others serving as foils for the development of white, Euro-American subjects and societies. Moreover the “science” of racialized thinking–from eugenics to modern forms of racism and anti-Semitism–often emerged in the colonial “laboratory,” wherein science was explicitly deployed to rationalize particular forms of exclusion and exploitation. How can we grapple with science as a historically racialized enterprise on one hand, and an essential–and potentially emancipatory–part of contemporary human life on the other?
In the class, we will address this question through an exploration of the history of race in science and the role of science in colonialism. In particular, how has knowledge about races and scientific standards been co-produced with European colonial expansion? What are the means and moments through which the idea of “race” became stabilized and accepted as scientifically sound? And what other cultural and scientific logics do ideas about race underwrite? Students will begin by examining historical texts by Charles Darwin, Lewis Henry Morgan, and Friedrich Engels – three 19th century thinkers who were critical to forming, popularizing, and applying ideas about race to scientific ideas about nature and culture. From there, we will consider how “whiteness” was constructed as a valorized norm through the activities of British colonists
At first glance, the work of science seems to provide empirically-grounded, universal explanations of natural and cultural phenomena. Yet as historians, anthropologists, and philosophers of science contend, such an understanding is at odds with the actual history of science, a history littered with racialized others serving as foils for the development of white, Euro-American subjects and societies. Moreover the “science” of racialized thinking–from eugenics to modern forms of racism and anti-Semitism–often emerged in the colonial “laboratory,” wherein science was explicitly deployed to rationalize particular forms of exclusion and exploitation. How can we grapple with science as a historically racialized enterprise on one hand, and an essential–and potentially emancipatory–part of contemporary human life on the other?
In the class, we will address this question through an exploration of the history of race in science and the role of science in colonialism. In particular, how has knowledge about races and scientific standards been co-produced with European colonial expansion? What are the means and moments through which the idea of “race” became stabilized and accepted as scientifically sound? And what other cultural and scientific logics do ideas about race underwrite? Students will begin by examining historical texts by Charles Darwin, Lewis Henry Morgan, and Friedrich Engels – three 19th century thinkers who were critical to forming, popularizing, and applying ideas about race to scientific ideas about nature and culture. From there, we will consider how “whiteness” was constructed as a valorized norm through the activities of British colonists
Comments
-
Sounds like RACE has done it again!
-
So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
Either way it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
I’m hearing margarine is a lot better for you than butter. Staff?PurpleThrobber said:
Either way it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
Who cares. It’s a goddamned delicious combo.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
Coffee is good for your heart and causes cancerMikeDamone said:
I’m hearing margarine is a lot better for you than butter. Staff?PurpleThrobber said:
Either way it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
Has that been peer reviewed?RaceBannon said:
Coffee is good for your heart and causes cancerMikeDamone said:
I’m hearing margarine is a lot better for you than butter. Staff?PurpleThrobber said:
Either way it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
Not the kind of abundance one is looking for.RaceBannon said:
Coffee is good for your heart and causes cancerMikeDamone said:
I’m hearing margarine is a lot better for you than butter. Staff?PurpleThrobber said:
Either way it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?
-
The science is settled.MikeDamone said:
Has that been peer reviewed?RaceBannon said:
Coffee is good for your heart and causes cancerMikeDamone said:
I’m hearing margarine is a lot better for you than butter. Staff?PurpleThrobber said:
Either way it will be interesting.MikeDamone said:So is wine and chocolate good for me or not?




